Teenager Who Has Been Dating Her Father For Two Years Reveals The Pair Are Planning To Get Married..

[PaintMyHouse]

I can't believe this sick f*ckin' thread is still going.

Nothing sick about it. It's a perfectly valid issue when any two adults can marry, or damn near.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

The defenders of homo marriage said it couldn't happen, yet here it is:

bripat the homophobe vomits his hate on USMB...

When you make your pilgrimage to Mecca, make sure you announce that you're gay so your religion can tolerate you properly. I'm sure they won't kill you on the spot, as shedding blood in Mecca is prohibited. No, they will drag you outside of the city and "tolerate" you to pieces. You do have such a tolerant religion and it totally makes sense that a gay person would choose to be Mooooslim.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The defenders of homo marriage said it couldn't happen, yet here it is:

bripat the homophobe vomits his hate on USMB...

When you make your pilgrimage to Mecca, make sure you announce that you're gay so your religion can tolerate you properly. I'm sure they won't kill you on the spot, as shedding blood in Mecca is prohibited. No, they will drag you outside of the city and "tolerate" you to pieces. You do have such a tolerant religion and it totally makes sense that a gay person would choose to be Mooooslim.

The penalty in Islam for being gay is no different than that of Christianity.

Leviticus 20:13

"'If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.

 

[Antares]

The defenders of homo marriage said it couldn't happen, yet here it is:

bripat the homophobe vomits his hate on USMB...

When you make your pilgrimage to Mecca, make sure you announce that you're gay so your religion can tolerate you properly. I'm sure they won't kill you on the spot, as shedding blood in Mecca is prohibited. No, they will drag you outside of the city and "tolerate" you to pieces. You do have such a tolerant religion and it totally makes sense that a gay person would choose to be Mooooslim.

The penalty in Islam for being gay is no different than that of Christianity.

Point to where one Homosexual has been killed this Century by a Christian.

.

 

[ChrisL]

The defenders of homo marriage said it couldn't happen, yet here it is:

bripat the homophobe vomits his hate on USMB...

When you make your pilgrimage to Mecca, make sure you announce that you're gay so your religion can tolerate you properly. I'm sure they won't kill you on the spot, as shedding blood in Mecca is prohibited. No, they will drag you outside of the city and "tolerate" you to pieces. You do have such a tolerant religion and it totally makes sense that a gay person would choose to be Mooooslim.

The penalty in Islam for being gay is no different than that of Christianity.

Leviticus 20:13

"'If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.

Lol. Okay, that might be true to an extent, but to be fair that doesn't happen with Christians in the modern world very often, where as in places like Iran, yes, it is a capital punishment offense. They hang them from cranes in the city squares.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The defenders of homo marriage said it couldn't happen, yet here it is:

bripat the homophobe vomits his hate on USMB...

When you make your pilgrimage to Mecca, make sure you announce that you're gay so your religion can tolerate you properly. I'm sure they won't kill you on the spot, as shedding blood in Mecca is prohibited. No, they will drag you outside of the city and "tolerate" you to pieces. You do have such a tolerant religion and it totally makes sense that a gay person would choose to be Mooooslim.

The penalty in Islam for being gay is no different than that of Christianity.

Point to where one Homosexual has been killed this Century by a Christian.

.

Start with Uganda.

And I can't help it if you ignore the teachings of your Holy Book. When they start to act like you do, being faithful in name only, then being a faggot won't be an issue for them either.

 

[Antares]

The defenders of homo marriage said it couldn't happen, yet here it is:

bripat the homophobe vomits his hate on USMB...

When you make your pilgrimage to Mecca, make sure you announce that you're gay so your religion can tolerate you properly. I'm sure they won't kill you on the spot, as shedding blood in Mecca is prohibited. No, they will drag you outside of the city and "tolerate" you to pieces. You do have such a tolerant religion and it totally makes sense that a gay person would choose to be Mooooslim.

The penalty in Islam for being gay is no different than that of Christianity.

Leviticus 20:13

"'If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.

Lol. Okay, that might be true to an extent, but to be fair that doesn't happen with Christians in the modern world very often, where as in places like Iran, yes, it is a capital punishment offense. They hang them from cranes in the city squares.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Mod Edit: Antares Knock it off

 

[Silhouette]

Now will the mods enter and tell St. Mike to knock it off too? Or do they like theater and role-players?

 

[danielpalos]

Since when can the several citizens in the several States, not be entitled to the privileges and immunities of the citizens in the several States?

It is disingenuous to believe that our Founding Fathers did not enumerate and express their Wisdom to their Posterity, regarding this "mission statement":

We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Surely, even some on the right can muster enough Constitutional fortitude to jump on Jefferson's bandwagon regarding his, recommendations:

Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.

I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it.
Thomas Jefferson

 

[SwimExpert]

Since when can the several citizens in the several States, not be entitled to the privileges and immunities of the citizens in the several States?

Do you suffer from brain damage?

 

[danielpalos]

Since when can the several citizens in the several States, not be entitled to the privileges and immunities of the citizens in the several States?

Do you suffer from brain damage?

Do you suffer from not having a clue or a Cause, and having Only fallacies as a result?

Since when can the several citizens in the several States, not be entitled to the privileges and immunities of the citizens in the several States?

 

[SwimExpert]

Since when can the several citizens in the several States, not be entitled to the privileges and immunities of the citizens in the several States?

Do you suffer from brain damage?

Do you suffer from not having a clue or a Cause, and having Only fallacies as a result?

Since when can the several citizens in the several States, not be entitled to the privileges and immunities of the citizens in the several States?

You are not even making a complete thought.

 

[danielpalos]

Since when can the several citizens in the several States, not be entitled to the privileges and immunities of the citizens in the several States?

Do you suffer from brain damage?

Do you suffer from not having a clue or a Cause, and having Only fallacies as a result?

Since when can the several citizens in the several States, not be entitled to the privileges and immunities of the citizens in the several States?

You are not even making a complete thought.

If you don't understand the statement, how well can you understand the concept?

 

[Silhouette]

Do you suffer from not having a clue or a Cause, and having Only fallacies as a result?

Since when can the several citizens in the several States, not be entitled to the privileges and immunities of the citizens in the several States?

Since now, since you are not considering all parties with a vested interest to the marriage contract and license:

In walk the rights of children to marriage....

And that changes the whole ball game. It's like you're discussing a contract with five parties and only hearing arguments from two of them; while the other three have the most vested interest in the contract of all five.

Children thrive best with a role model of their same gender in the home. There is no arguing this and further, the Prince's Trust study proves this. In this next Hearing, the Supreme Court will be forced to look at the welfare not just of some kids caught up in a lacking situation by the adults or adult in their lives, but also the 100s of millions of kids yet to be born in this lab experiment.

Since "parenting" kids with no role model of their gender present half the time is highly experimental (and statistically doomed to failure of the children's best interest and esteem), an absolute rock-bottom MUST is allowing the discreet communities this radical change will affect into time unforeseeable, the RIGHT to vote on whether or not this base structural change to marriage should or should not be allowed.

Anything less is a macabre tyranny, a forced perversion into the heart of American society without its expressed consent. And that violates the core structure of our country, on top of marriage.. Violating the core of things seems to be an ongoing theme with the aggressive group lobbying for these collosal changes without the permission of the governed for them.

 

[danielpalos]

Doesn't matter since Only the right is asking for that form of "affirmative action" while complaining about it in affirmative action threads.

 

[SwimExpert]

Since when can the several citizens in the several States, not be entitled to the privileges and immunities of the citizens in the several States?

Do you suffer from brain damage?

Do you suffer from not having a clue or a Cause, and having Only fallacies as a result?

Since when can the several citizens in the several States, not be entitled to the privileges and immunities of the citizens in the several States?

You are not even making a complete thought.

If you don't understand the statement, how well can you understand the concept?

There is no statement. All you posted was an incomplete sentence.

 

[danielpalos]

Since when can the several citizens in the several States, not be entitled to the privileges and immunities of the citizens in the several States?

Do you suffer from brain damage?

Do you suffer from not having a clue or a Cause, and having Only fallacies as a result?

Since when can the several citizens in the several States, not be entitled to the privileges and immunities of the citizens in the several States?

You are not even making a complete thought.

If you don't understand the statement, how well can you understand the concept?

There is no statement. All you posted was an incomplete sentence.

It is only your understanding that is incomplete. You either understand the concept or "gist" of it, or you don't. Shills usually don't have a clue or a not for profit Cause.

Did you know that diversion is also usually considered a fallacy?

 

[SwimExpert]

[QUOTE="danielpalos, post: 10663089, member: 53092"
It is only your understanding that is incomplete.[/QUOTE]

No, you posted an incomplete sentence. Go back to school, take a few more grammar classes, and come back when you have learned English.

 

[danielpalos]

[QUOTE="danielpalos, post: 10663089, member: 53092"It is only your understanding that is incomplete.

No, you posted an incomplete sentence. Go back to school, take a few more grammar classes, and come back when you have learned English.

It is a complete sentence; you are merely resorting to a fallacy of diversion, simply because you don't have a clue or a Cause, nor even a valid argument.

 

[SwimExpert]

Thanks to Law and Order SVU I was tipped off to something of interest here.

Genetic sexual attraction (GSA) is sexual attraction between close relatives, such as siblings or half-siblings, a parent and offspring, or first and second cousins, who first meet as adults.[1]

The term was coined in the US in the late 1980s by Barbara Gonyo, the founder of Truth Seekers In Adoption, a Chicago-based support group for adoptees and their new-found relatives.[2]

Genetic sexual attraction - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Genetic Sexual Attraction husband and wife discover they are brother and sister - Americas - World - The Independent

Home Page The Genetic Sexual Attraction Forum