Take a Knee

Good. Looters, savages, rioters, pillagers, thieves aren't peaceful protesters.

Those who murder blacks with badges aren't police. They're thugs.
What about the ones that murder whites?
Why are you sheeple so stuck on this being a race thing? Because of the media?

Cops proportionately kill more unarmed blacks than whites, but the cops skin color doesn't seem to matter much. They are all blue, and will cover for their own
Do you have a link for that claim?
I assume now
Just throwing up what gets shoved down your throat.

Something shoved down your throat seems to be something you worry about a lot.
 
Good. Looters, savages, rioters, pillagers, thieves aren't peaceful protesters.

Those who murder blacks with badges aren't police. They're thugs.
What about the ones that murder whites?
Why are you sheeple so stuck on this being a race thing? Because of the media?

Cops proportionately kill more unarmed blacks than whites, but the cops skin color doesn't seem to matter much. They are all blue, and will cover for their own
Do you have a link for that claim?
View attachment 343818
Explain this

 
That officer will be identified and he will lose his job and pension.

Marc,

I see this different. The officer should have a definite talking to and maybe a demotion.

It is clear in a quite quick actions he did wrong, his partner corrected him and there was no damage done.

There seems to be a problem in training, properly trained people would never get themselves in this position. This is possibly with cuts Police are spending more days on the beat and not enough in training. My wife is a nurse and she can walk into a hospital and spot it in nursing practices.

This also covers evaluations and discipline. Again for single officer police cars, two would make it a lot safer for the Police and thus for citizens...

The big takeaway Europe has with these types of events.

A US Cop is 99 times more likely to kill a US Citizen(armed or unarmed) than a UK Cop.
That rate is 240 times if black.
That rate 71 times if white.
That rate is 20 times if unarmed.

So US Cops are killing Unarmed Citizens at 20 times the rate that UK cops are killing (armed and unarmed) citizens... Let's explain that?

The only reason the other cop did that was because that tactic was the cause of all the protests. I doubt he would have stopped him otherwise. Nobody stopped him from putting his knee on another person's neck just a couple minutes before then.
 
Good. Looters, savages, rioters, pillagers, thieves aren't peaceful protesters.

Those who murder blacks with badges aren't police. They're thugs.
What about the ones that murder whites?
Why are you sheeple so stuck on this being a race thing? Because of the media?

Cops proportionately kill more unarmed blacks than whites, but the cops skin color doesn't seem to matter much. They are all blue, and will cover for their own
Do you have a link for that claim?
View attachment 343818
Explain this


You're still trying to claim all the protesters were looters. Nope.
 
Good. Looters, savages, rioters, pillagers, thieves aren't peaceful protesters.

Those who murder blacks with badges aren't police. They're thugs.
What about the ones that murder whites?
Why are you sheeple so stuck on this being a race thing? Because of the media?

Cops proportionately kill more unarmed blacks than whites, but the cops skin color doesn't seem to matter much. They are all blue, and will cover for their own
Do you have a link for that claim?
View attachment 343818
Explain this


You're still trying to claim all the protesters were looters. Nope.
When did I say "all"?
 
Good. Looters, savages, rioters, pillagers, thieves aren't peaceful protesters.

Those who murder blacks with badges aren't police. They're thugs.
What about the ones that murder whites?
Why are you sheeple so stuck on this being a race thing? Because of the media?

Cops proportionately kill more unarmed blacks than whites, but the cops skin color doesn't seem to matter much. They are all blue, and will cover for their own
Do you have a link for that claim?
View attachment 343818
Your link doesnt support your assertion.
 
...You're still trying to claim all the protesters were looters.
Now you're just flat-out lying. There is only one reason you'd feel the need to do that.

That's the implication I got from your posts. Please correct me. What percentage do you think were protesters as opposed to anarchists that only wanted destruction?
 
Good. Looters, savages, rioters, pillagers, thieves aren't peaceful protesters.

Those who murder blacks with badges aren't police. They're thugs.
What about the ones that murder whites?
Why are you sheeple so stuck on this being a race thing? Because of the media?

Cops proportionately kill more unarmed blacks than whites, but the cops skin color doesn't seem to matter much. They are all blue, and will cover for their own
Do you have a link for that claim?
View attachment 343818
Your link doesnt support your assertion.

If that doesn't please you, there are many more links, but real life calls for now. I'll show more next time.
 
Good. Looters, savages, rioters, pillagers, thieves aren't peaceful protesters.

Those who murder blacks with badges aren't police. They're thugs.
What about the ones that murder whites?
Why are you sheeple so stuck on this being a race thing? Because of the media?

Cops proportionately kill more unarmed blacks than whites, but the cops skin color doesn't seem to matter much. They are all blue, and will cover for their own
Do you have a link for that claim?
View attachment 343818
Your link doesnt support your assertion.

If that doesn't please you, there are many more links, but real life calls for now. I'll show more next time.
You mean you will show one, not more.
As you havent posted one proving your assertion.
 

There's a problem here
"The version of the Minneapolis Police Department's policy manual that is available on-line, however, does permit the use of neck restraints that can render suspects unconscious, and the protocol for their use appears not to have been updated for more than eight years."

"The on-line version of the policy manual says, "The unconscious neck restraint shall only be applied … 1. On a subject who is exhibiting active aggression, or; 2. For life saving purposes, or; 3. On a subject who is exhibiting active resistance in order to gain control of the subject; and if lesser attempts at control have been or would likely be ineffective."


So it would appear the cop did nothing wrong in placing his knee of Floyd's neck, and since the autopsy shows Floyd's death was not the result of police actions, the only problem we have here is that far left politicians are planning to lynch a police officer who did nothing wrong to exploit this unfortunate incident for their own political gain.
 

There's a problem here
"The version of the Minneapolis Police Department's policy manual that is available on-line, however, does permit the use of neck restraints that can render suspects unconscious, and the protocol for their use appears not to have been updated for more than eight years."

"The on-line version of the policy manual says, "The unconscious neck restraint shall only be applied … 1. On a subject who is exhibiting active aggression, or; 2. For life saving purposes, or; 3. On a subject who is exhibiting active resistance in order to gain control of the subject; and if lesser attempts at control have been or would likely be ineffective."


So it would appear the cop did nothing wrong in placing his knee of Floyd's neck, and since the autopsy shows Floyd's death was not the result of police actions, the only problem we have here is that far left politicians are planning to lynch a police officer who did nothing wrong to exploit this unfortunate incident for their own political gain.
Most likely he committed murder. As your post notes, the neck kneeling thing is only the last resort to subduing a suspect who is a mortal threat to the cops or citizens. That guy was not only neither, he was outnumbered 4-1
 
...You're still trying to claim all the protesters were looters.
Now you're just flat-out lying. There is only one reason you'd feel the need to do that.

That's the implication I got from your posts. Please correct me. What percentage do you think were protesters as opposed to anarchists that only wanted destruction?

Implication? Good lord.
Percentage of looters? Who cares, ONE is too many
 

There's a problem here
"The version of the Minneapolis Police Department's policy manual that is available on-line, however, does permit the use of neck restraints that can render suspects unconscious, and the protocol for their use appears not to have been updated for more than eight years."

"The on-line version of the policy manual says, "The unconscious neck restraint shall only be applied … 1. On a subject who is exhibiting active aggression, or; 2. For life saving purposes, or; 3. On a subject who is exhibiting active resistance in order to gain control of the subject; and if lesser attempts at control have been or would likely be ineffective."


So it would appear the cop did nothing wrong in placing his knee of Floyd's neck, and since the autopsy shows Floyd's death was not the result of police actions, the only problem we have here is that far left politicians are planning to lynch a police officer who did nothing wrong to exploit this unfortunate incident for their own political gain.
Most likely he committed murder. As your post notes, the neck kneeling thing is only the last resort to subduing a suspect who is a mortal threat to the cops or citizens. That guy was not only neither, he was outnumbered 4-1
That is not what the manual says. The knee on the neck is allowed if the subject resists arrest, which Floyd did, and other methods of restraining him have failed. Floyd repeatedly refused to comply with lawful orders from the police and it took four police officers to restrain him. There is no rational basis for calling this murder.
 
This is part of the training in non lethal submission. Not everyone has a bad heart.
Sounds like you're making excuses. Any first-responder with adequate basic training knows that handcuffing a big guy behind his back and pinning him to the pavement like that could kill him.
Big guys with bad hearts have an obligation not to be criminals. The dying is entirely voluntary.
Have you seen any sort of evidence that Floyd actually committed the crime that he was accused of. Passing a counterfeit $20 bill?

That scam is well known. The mark goes into a store to buy something and pays for the merchandise with genuine dollars, then the clerk pulls a sleight of hand switcharoo trick under the counter and vehemently claims that the mark gave them counterfeit money.

Usually the amount of money is so small as to be insignificant to the mark going into a convenience store for a quick cup of coffee, sandwich, squishy or 6-pack. So they don't even question it and give the clerk the benefit of the doubt, and give them another real $20 dollar bill.

If the clerk gets away with this 10 times a day, that will pay for his $200/day heroin habit. His regular minimum wage salary certainly isn't going to be enough to fund that kind of drug habit.
 
Last edited:
At worst in the Floyd case, it looks like an accidental killing.
Not to anyone who saw the video of his murder.
I'm not sure if it was his intention to kill Floyd, but it did seem he did not care how much pain he was inflicting or about Floyd's general health.


'Things have got to change'?

God already thought about that one:

'Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.'

If everyone acted with that in mind we would have such problems......


Just sayin'....

It was the attitude you see from far too many police officers. No one was going to tell him what to do. He remained there for almost 9 minutes because no one was going to tell him to get off the man.
 
It was the attitude you see from far too many police officers. No one was going to tell him what to do. He remained there for almost 9 minutes because no one was going to tell him to get off the man.

Which ended up equating to a crime for 3 other officers who saw it and did nothing.

Again, 'Do Unto Others' - God already had this taken care of, but it is obvious not everyone listened.

This concept God came up with applies to
- The cop who killed Floyd

- The cops watching it happening

- Looters destroying a stores and stripping them of everything ('Thou Shalt Not Steal' applies also)

- Thugs beating innocent people, pulling motorists out of cars, beating them, and torching their cars

- Arsonists burning stores / homes / buildings, etc....

- Criminals who have killed police and incent people (Thou Shalt Not Kill)

Violence begats violence. MLK knew this, which is why he advocated for PEACEFUL protests. He also knew that when thugs/criminals/terrorists begin disproportionately causing violence and destruction the message is lost and results in hostility towards those who hijack the peaceful protest / attempt to bring about change.

Instead of 'MLK Jr's, today we have professional agitators and terrorists who seek to incite violence and division instead of bringing about real change.
 
It was the attitude you see from far too many police officers. No one was going to tell him what to do. He remained there for almost 9 minutes because no one was going to tell him to get off the man.

Which ended up equating to a crime for 3 other officers who saw it and did nothing.

Again, 'Do Unto Others' - God already had this taken care of, but it is obvious not everyone listened.

This concept God came up with applies to
- The cop who killed Floyd

- The cops watching it happening

- Looters destroying a stores and stripping them of everything ('Thou Shalt Not Steal' applies also)

- Thugs beating innocent people, pulling motorists out of cars, beating them, and torching their cars

- Arsonists burning stores / homes / buildings, etc....

- Criminals who have killed police and incent people (Thou Shalt Not Kill)

Violence begats violence. MLK knew this, which is why he advocated for PEACEFUL protests. He also knew that when thugs/criminals/terrorists begin disproportionately causing violence and destruction the message is lost and results in hostility towards those who hijack the peaceful protest / attempt to bring about change.

Instead of 'MLK Jr's, today we have professional agitators and terrorists who seek to incite violence and division instead of bringing about real change.

People tried peaceful protest. The president called for them to be fired and the vice president walked out on them.

How much different might it be today if instead the president had invited them to the White House to address their concerns?
 

Forum List

Back
Top