T/F: Hillarys numbers can only go down; Trump's can only go up

bucs90

Gold Member
Feb 25, 2010
26,545
6,027
280
My opinion......we've known Hillary for 25 years now. Trump? New to politics.

My opinion now is.....

If you don't like Hillary by now....you NEVER will.
If you don't HATE Trump by now....you NEVER will.

So....Hillarys numbers can only stay even or go down.
And....Trump's numbers can only stay even or go up.

As time goes...some who lean Hillary may begin to change their minds. And some who dislike Trump...may change their mind.

But I just don't see how anyone who doesn't already like Hillary all of a sudden sees her and likes her. We've seen and heard it all. So.....all she can do is lose voters.

And I don't see how someone who doesn't already hate Trump...begins hating him. If you don't by now....you wont. So...he's lost what he'll lose already. All he can do is gain voters.


Thoughts?? I think this thing is slowly but surely gonna drift to a deadlock in November. I believe this could be the closest election maybe in US history.
 
Back in reality, Hillary's numbers tend to go up with more exposure. That is, when people see actually see and hear her, they start to realize that the stories the right tells about her are all fraudulent.

Trump, the reverse. The more people see him speak, the crazier and nastier he looks, and the more unpopular he gets.

That's speaking of how normal people react, of course, as opposed to Trump-cultists.
 
My opinion......we've known Hillary for 25 years now. Trump? New to politics.

You actually think Donald The Rump is an unknown?
shakehead.gif


Kind of... ah.... makes those votes hard to explain, donut?

Actually, once his political babblings are (finally) held up to scrutiny in the public square, that goes a long way to explain how he could lose a ton of votes put there by superficial shit like "I know that guy, I've seen him on WWE".
 
Back in reality, Hillary's numbers tend to go up with more exposure. That is, when people see actually see and hear her, they start to realize that the stories the right tells about her are all fraudulent.

Trump, the reverse. The more people see him speak, the crazier and nastier he looks, and the more unpopular he gets.

That's speaking of how normal people react, of course, as opposed to Trump-cultists.
If you truly think this then Van Jones' prediction will indeed come true.

You are in total denial.
 
Back in reality, Hillary's numbers tend to go up with more exposure. That is, when people see actually see and hear her, they start to realize that the stories the right tells about her are all fraudulent.

Trump, the reverse. The more people see him speak, the crazier and nastier he looks, and the more unpopular he gets.

That's speaking of how normal people react, of course, as opposed to Trump-cultists.
LOL (literally). Hillary gets more popular with more exposure? How'd that work out in West Virginia?
 
Back in reality, Hillary's numbers tend to go up with more exposure. That is, when people see actually see and hear her, they start to realize that the stories the right tells about her are all fraudulent.

Trump, the reverse. The more people see him speak, the crazier and nastier he looks, and the more unpopular he gets.

That's speaking of how normal people react, of course, as opposed to Trump-cultists.

If her numbers go up when exposed,now there's a nasty brain image...why does she always hide from the press?
 
The more “policy announcements” Drumpf makes, the better it is for HRC. The “foreign policy” announcement sounded as if it were written by Seth Myers and few would look at his health care announcement as being better than the ACA since if you have PECs, you’re screwed, if you have a serious, lengthy illness requiring long-term care, you’re screwed. Mr. “wages are too high” wants you to sock away some of your “too high” paycheck into Health Savings Accounts so when you get ill…you’ll have some money to pay for the illness…about the first 13 minutes of your hospital visit more than likely.

It has the added benefit of framing Drumpf. The framing does him damage because the more he talks like a politician, the less his knob polishers like him. Also the more confusing they become because he usually flip flops on these announcements.

A non-vote for Trump (stay at home, vote for anyone else) is a vote for HRC. The more people know about Drumpf, the more they like Hillary.
 
Back in reality, Hillary's numbers tend to go up with more exposure. That is, when people see actually see and hear her, they start to realize that the stories the right tells about her are all fraudulent.

Trump, the reverse. The more people see him speak, the crazier and nastier he looks, and the more unpopular he gets.

That's speaking of how normal people react, of course, as opposed to Trump-cultists.

Oh freaking bite me! He is now on the edge of the being the primary candidate with the most votes in R history in 30 years.

:lol:
 
The more “policy announcements” Drumpf makes, the better it is for HRC. The “foreign policy” announcement sounded as if it were written by Seth Myers and few would look at his health care announcement as being better than the ACA since if you have PECs, you’re screwed, if you have a serious, lengthy illness requiring long-term care, you’re screwed. Mr. “wages are too high” wants you to sock away some of your “too high” paycheck into Health Savings Accounts so when you get ill…you’ll have some money to pay for the illness…about the first 13 minutes of your hospital visit more than likely.

It has the added benefit of framing Drumpf. The framing does him damage because the more he talks like a politician, the less his knob polishers like him. Also the more confusing they become because he usually flip flops on these announcements.

A non-vote for Trump (stay at home, vote for anyone else) is a vote for HRC. The more people know about Drumpf, the more they like Hillary.

The polls don't show that. You have three battleground states that are now in a statistical dead heat between them.
 
The more “policy announcements” Drumpf makes, the better it is for HRC. The “foreign policy” announcement sounded as if it were written by Seth Myers and few would look at his health care announcement as being better than the ACA since if you have PECs, you’re screwed, if you have a serious, lengthy illness requiring long-term care, you’re screwed. Mr. “wages are too high” wants you to sock away some of your “too high” paycheck into Health Savings Accounts so when you get ill…you’ll have some money to pay for the illness…about the first 13 minutes of your hospital visit more than likely.

It has the added benefit of framing Drumpf. The framing does him damage because the more he talks like a politician, the less his knob polishers like him. Also the more confusing they become because he usually flip flops on these announcements.

A non-vote for Trump (stay at home, vote for anyone else) is a vote for HRC. The more people know about Drumpf, the more they like Hillary.

The polls don't show that. You have three battleground states that are now in a statistical dead heat between them.

The longer it goes on, if HRC can avoid stepping in it, the more she will increase her lead.
 
More than GW who didn't face a challenger vs 16 opponents.

Trump passes Romney’s popular vote total, likely to break GOP record
By Kyle Cheney

04/26/16 11:42 PM EDT

Updated 04/27/16 12:06 AM EDT

With his five blowout wins Tuesday night, Donald Trump has passed Mitt Romney’s popular vote total from four years ago and is on a trajectory that could land him more Republican votes than any presidential candidate in modern history – by a lot.

Trump surged to more than 10 million votes, according to totals that include Tuesday’s preliminary results across the Northeast. That’s already about 250,000 more than Romney earned in the entire 2012 primary season and 153,000 more than John McCain earned in 2008.

More significantly, Trump is positioned to easily pass the modern record-holder, George W. Bush, who collected 10.8 million votes in 2000.

That presents an uncomfortable reality for anti-Trump forces: they’re attempting to thwart the candidate who is likely to win more Republican primary votes than any GOP contender in at least the last 36 years, and maybe ever.

Trump passes Romney’s popular vote total, likely to break GOP record
 
If her numbers go up when exposed,now there's a nasty brain image...why does she always hide from the press?

Simple. She doesn't.

Thanks for providing an example of the big ol' lies the right tells about her.

Could some other HDS kooks please provide more examples that demonstrate my point?
 
More than GW who didn't face a challenger vs 16 opponents.

Trump passes Romney’s popular vote total, likely to break GOP record
By Kyle Cheney

04/26/16 11:42 PM EDT

Updated 04/27/16 12:06 AM EDT

With his five blowout wins Tuesday night, Donald Trump has passed Mitt Romney’s popular vote total from four years ago and is on a trajectory that could land him more Republican votes than any presidential candidate in modern history – by a lot.

Trump surged to more than 10 million votes, according to totals that include Tuesday’s preliminary results across the Northeast. That’s already about 250,000 more than Romney earned in the entire 2012 primary season and 153,000 more than John McCain earned in 2008.

More significantly, Trump is positioned to easily pass the modern record-holder, George W. Bush, who collected 10.8 million votes in 2000.

That presents an uncomfortable reality for anti-Trump forces: they’re attempting to thwart the candidate who is likely to win more Republican primary votes than any GOP contender in at least the last 36 years, and maybe ever.

Trump passes Romney’s popular vote total, likely to break GOP record

He’s a celebrity….he is supposed to be popular. I bet if Tom Hanks or Dwayne Johnson ran, they would do even better.
 
Hillary is a terrible candidate. She sounds like every guy's ex and has the people skills of a block of stone. People like the idea of Hillary, but the more they see of her, the less they like the reality.
 
Hillary is a terrible candidate. She sounds like every guy's ex and has the people skills of a block of stone. People like the idea of Hillary, but the more they see of her, the less they like the reality.

You don't need one iota of "people skills" when the alternative is Donald Rump.
Think about it.
 
Hillary is a terrible candidate. She sounds like every guy's ex and has the people skills of a block of stone. People like the idea of Hillary, but the more they see of her, the less they like the reality.

You don't need one iota of "people skills" when the alternative is Donald Rump.
Think about it.
Actually, you do. We know that negative politics works, and the Trumpster is the king of negative, perhaps on par with the Clinton slime machine. Bill would be immune, Hillary not so much.
 
Hillary is a terrible candidate. She sounds like every guy's ex and has the people skills of a block of stone. People like the idea of Hillary, but the more they see of her, the less they like the reality.
Yep, Hillary IS a terrible candidate (not to mention a fucking scumbag of a person) and yet at this point it looks like she's going to win the general election, which (if she does indeed win) is like getting the shit kicked out of you by a 2 year old Hobbit....

Way to go Republicans! just when one thought you couldn't embarrass yourselves any more than you already have you manage to surprise to the downside.:rolleyes:
 

Forum List

Back
Top