Really..... 
How about we look at facts, over opinion? How about that?
Uh, your graph proves my point. Only about 10% are there for Rape and Murder.. Simple assault, meh, don't really care that much. White people get probation, black people get jail to feed the Prison Industrial Complex.
913,000 violent criminals. In order to get down to your made up 200,000 number, we would have to release into the population 700,000 violent criminals. And this doesn't surprise me, since this is the pure idiotic stupidity that the left-wing fools have been pushing for decades now. You are just the latest parrot of the incompetence.
Right. Just lock up the rapists (the real rapists, not some bullshit "Statutory rape" charge because little Sally is a slut) and the murderers, and you get down to maybe about 200,000 who should be in prison.
I could cite dozens of your posts I'm sure, but this one will do. From December 2018 Quote:
Wow, did you actually waste your time going through all my posts for the last two years trying to find something you could take out of context. Because it kind of proves my point. Some rich guy collapses the whole ******* economic system, ruins people's economic livelihoods, and they don't go to jail, but some kid who holds up the local liquor store for $50.00 needs to go to prison for years to feed the Prison Industrial Complex.
Uh, your graph proves my point. Only about 10% are there for Rape and Murder.. Simple assault, meh, don't really care that much. White people get probation, black people get jail to feed the Prison Industrial Complex.
Uh, you said there would only be 200,000. With rape and murder alone, that's 300,000.
Proves your point, only if you can't do basic math, like a public school student.
Second, I posted a link of a man directly assaulting a woman. You claimed that you were not talking about violent people. Here again, you are suggesting that only rapists and murderers should be sent to prison.
SO..... based on your comments, you are saying that man in the video I linked that was directly attacking a woman.... should be released? What should happen to him? He likely has no money, so it's not like you can fine him.
Either criminals should be in prison, or they should not. Which is it? Because if you claim only rapists and murderers should be in prison, then you are saying nothing should happen to that guy that attacked that woman.
Third, there is zero evidence that white people get probation, and black people go to jail to feed the prison industrial complex.
No evidence that two people with identical criminal histories, and identical situations, end up with entirely different sentences. None. Provide your evidence that identical criminals get different results based purely on skin.
Right. Just lock up the rapists (the real rapists, not some bullshit "Statutory rape" charge because little Sally is a slut) and the murderers, and you get down to maybe about 200,000 who should be in prison.
I am in fact, somewhat sympathetic to view that what is defined as rape needs to be evaluated more carefully.
Better though, would be to not have girls hanging out with guys, that they are not married to. It's baffling how many women end up getting raped in their own home, or in the guys home, as if going someone with a guy alone, by yourself, and acting shocked by what happens.
Except that they have been taught this by left-wing stupidity... with idiotic fools who don't believe there should be any standards for moral conduct, and then complain there are not standards for moral conduct.
That said, most people who do not commit violent rape, are put on probation or paroled. That numbers that I've seen suggest there are 2 people on probation or prole for every one that is in prison.
Seems reasonable to me.
Wow, did you actually waste your time going through all my posts for the last two years trying to find something you could take out of context. Because it kind of proves my point. Some rich guy collapses the whole ******* economic system, ruins people's economic livelihoods, and they don't go to jail, but some kid who holds up the local liquor store for $50.00 needs to go to prison for years to feed the Prison Industrial Complex.
Sure, of course I did. And there was nothing taken out of context. You actually just validated my entire point with this post here.
You are claiming that a kid who shoves a gun in someones face, and could kill a person, should not go to prison... but a banker who harmed no one anywhere.... should.
You just blew up your own position that only rapists and murders should be in prison.
You really think if I threatened your life, or the life of your family, and could have killed your wife or daughter, or yourself.....
You would say nothing should happen to me? After all, I didn't rape, nor did I murder.... yeah I came close, yeah I could have killed the people you love most in life, in front of you... yeah I could have ruined your entire life violently.... but but I didn't.... so you can't touch me?
But a banker.... who harmed no one... that guy should go to prison? For nothing?
Or are you suggesting that the loss of your personal money is considered violence? And therefore the banker should go to prison? Because if you take money from my store... then that's violence, and that kid wanting $50 should go to prison too.
You can't logically make a point. You are contradicting your own position in every post.
abc7news.com
www.usmessageboard.com
www.vox.com
