velvtacheeze
Gold Member
- Mar 10, 2013
- 1,959
- 299
- 130
In an attempt to amalgamate this issue, I will list off some key similarities and differences between the proposed use of military force against Syria, and President George W. Bush's invasion of Iraq in 2003. Feel free to debate them as you see fit.
First, a timeline leading up to the second invasion of Iraq:
February 28, 1991: A ceasefire between The UN Coalition (including the United States) and Iraq was negotiated, thus ending the first Gulf War.
October 1998: It became clear to the Clinton Administration that Saddam Hussein had to be removed from power. It thus passed the Iraq Liberation Act as a response to the expulsion of UN Weapons Inspectors in August of the preceding year.
December 16, 1998: The United States and Great Britain launch a joint bombardment campaign against Iraq, known as Operation Desert Fox; in hopes of weakening Saddam Hussein's grip on power or removing him altogether.
November 7, 2000: President George W. Bush was elected as the 43rd President of The United States. During the campaign, Republicans pushed for a more aggressive stance on Iraq, citing the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 as a starting point to removing Hussein completely from power.
September 11, 2001: Terrorists hijack four airliners, flying two of them into the two World Trade Center Towers causing them to collapse, resulting in the deaths of over 3,000 people. Another was flown into the Pentagon, and another intended for the White House was brought down in Shanksville, Pennsylvania by a brave contingent of passengers.
September 20, 2001: After months of inaction regarding Saddam Hussein and Iraq, President Bush addresses a joint session of Congress in a world simulcast, unveiling a new strategy to combat terrorism, known as the "War on Terror." Accompanying it, was a military action of pre-emptive doctrine known as the "Bush Doctrine."
September 12, 2002: President Bush calls for a UN Security Resolution on Iraq.
October 16, 2002: Congress passes the Iraq Resolution.
November 8, 2002: The UN Security Council adopts Resolution 1441 which authorized the resumption of weapons inspections in Iraq and promised "serious consequences" for non-compliance.
January 28, 2003: President Bush remarks in his State of The Union address that "we know that Iraq, in the late 1990s, had several mobile biological weapons labs"
February 5, 2003: US Secretary of State Colin Powell addresses the United Nations General Assembly, continuing U.S. efforts to gain UN authorization for an invasion, citing what later turned out to be allegedly faulty intelligence by an Iraqi immigrant describing a "mobile biological weapons laboratory."
March 17, 2003: President Bush issues a 48-hour deadline for Saddam Hussein and his two sons Uday and Qusay Hussein to leave the country immediately.
March 18, 2003: A day before the deadline was due to expire, the bombing of Iraq by the United States, the United Kingdom, Spain, Italy, Poland, Australia, and Denmark began. (Note here that the US was backed by a coalition of countries in order to accomplish a clear goal)
March 19-20, 2003: The US led coalition of approximately 148,000 soldiers from the United States, 45,000 British soldiers, 2,000 Australian soldiers and 194 Polish soldiers from the special forces unit GROM, initiated the invasion of Iraq. The invasion force was also supported by Iraqi Kurdish militia troops, estimated to number upwards of 70,000. This was known as Operation Iraqi Freedom.
May 1, 2003: After 21 days, the invasion officially ends, with Saddam Hussein and his Baathist government being deposed from power.
December 13, 2003: Saddam is captured in ad-Dawr, Iraq, near his hometown of Tikrit, after spending the majority of the year on the run after being ousted from power. He is later hung for crimes against the people of Iraq, three years later on December 30, 2006.
And now, a timeline leading up to the attempts by President Obama to launch military action against Syria for supposedly using chemical weapons on its people:
March 16, 2011: An uprising is born in the city of Daraa, Syria.
April 25, 2011: Syrian troops and tanks are deployed to Daraa, Homs and other cities in Syria in an effort to quell the uprising which by then had consumed the entire country. This newborn uprising was met with all deliberate force from the Assad regime for the years succeeding the beginning of this uprising. A total of an estimated 110,875 people have been killed in an attempt to crush the rebellion (as of 2013). What was a protest turned into an armed rebellion, with troops defecting from the Syrian Army to fight for rebel forces.
August 20, 2012: President Obama in an interview with NBC's Chuck Todd draws a "red line" for the Assad regime and threatens military action if it were to be discovered that it has used chemical weapons against it's own people. "We have been very clear to the Assad regime, but also to other players on the ground, that a red line for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilized," the president said. "That would change my calculus. That would change my equation."
March 19, 2013: Rebels in the Syrian Civil War accuse President Bashar al-Assad of launching a chemical attack against them in the city of Aleppo, the attack killed 24 people.
April 22, 2013: The terrorist group Hezbollah enters the war in support of the Assad regime.
June 13, 2013:President Obama approves arming the Syrian Rebels against the Assad regime.
Thursday, August 21, 2013: A Sarin gas attack is unleashed in the region known as the Gouta, near the Syrian capital of Damascus. The attack was responsible for the deaths of at least 1,400 people. Once again, rebels accuse Bashar al-Assad of launching the attack. This leads to the Obama Administration calling for strikes against the Assad regime, calling on Britain and France to join them in the effort.
Thursday, August 29, 2013: British Parliament rejects military action against Syria, leaving the US and possibly France to organize a limited strike. (Note here, that British rejected Obama's proposal, and unlike the Iraq invasion, there is no coalition of nations coming to the aid of the United States)
Saturday, August 31, 2013: President Barack Obama continues moving for strikes against Syria, after citing "undeniable" evidence that the Assad regime was responsible for the chemical attacks in Aleppo and the Gouta.
Tuesday, September 3, 2013: House Speaker John Boehner throws his support behind Obama's proposed strikes against Syria.
Wednesday, September 4, 2013: Reports surface saying that Arab countries are offering to pay America to launch a full scale invasion of Syria. Secretary of Defense John Kerry did not deny or reject the offer: 'With respect to Arab countries offering to bear costs and to assist, the answer is profoundly yes,' Kerry said. 'They have. That offer is on the table.' Also, later that night, the Senate Relations Committee votes 10-7 authorizing Obama to use limited strikes on Syria.
Monday, September 9, 2013: The Senate returns to Capitol Hill to consider giving Obama the power to strike Syria.
Note that in one instance, a president skilfully pulls together a coalition to accomplish one goal. In the other, a president incompetently tries to organize a coalition to accomplish an unknown goal. He is rejected immediately by the international community, leaving him to possibly take on this task alone. He risks alienating our allies and angering our enemies even further.
This is filled with inaccuracies and omissions.
Good work.
The GOP Ministry of Propaganda thanks you.
The most glaring omission would be the rest of the Iraq War from 2003 onwards. It was a GOP-led fiasco, wasting billions of dollars, taking innocent Iraqi lives, causing misery for US troops and their families, and eventually putting in a pro-Iran regime in Iraq.
Way to go, GOP. No wonder the sigh of relief from the rest of the world when McCain & Mittypoo lost could be heard from sea to shining sea.