Synthetic mRNA Covid vaccines: A Risk-Benefit Analysis

[phoenyx]

The following quote is from an article published in February, but I think it brings up issues that are still quite relevant today...
**
Sadaf Gilani
Feb 22, 2021

With a “vaccine” based on untested technology, and safety trials still ongoing, is it safe to take the shot? And does it even work? And does a disease with an IFR of 0.2% even justify that risk?

[snip]

Covid is the umbrella label for PCR “positive” people regardless of clinical presentation. Most are “asymptomatic,”some have generic cold/flu symptoms, and a few present with moderate or severe respiratory distress. Unfortunately, the PCR assays being used for diagnosis, are not fit for purpose. Most PCR assays are constructed based on the German Drosten et al. protocol.

On November 27th 2020, 22 scientists submitted a request for retraction of this protocol which was published in the journal Eurosurveillance, citing a number of fatal design flaws.

It is also important to note, despite SarsCov2 virus and the syndrome labelled as Covid being used interchangeably, causation has not been proven as per Koch’s postulates.

The first metric which every medical doctor must convey to a person is how deadly Covid actually is. This is context for the legal and ethical practice of informed consent.

Incidentally, all Covid death stats are inflated: under direction of the WHO, deaths ‘from” and incidentally “with” Covid are not distinguished. Death coding has changed compared to Influenza/Pneumonia. According to one published analysis, this has resulted in over 16 times inflation of death stats, as supported by CDC data.

**

Full article here:

Synthetic mRNA Covid vaccines: A Risk-Benefit Analysis

With a “vaccine” based on untested technology, and safety trials still ongoing, is it safe to take the shot? And does it even work? And does a disease with an IFR of 0.2% even justify that risk?…

off-guardian.org

 

[Whodatsaywhodat.]

The following quote is from an article published in February, but I think it brings up issues that are still quite relevant today...
**
Sadaf Gilani
Feb 22, 2021

With a “vaccine” based on untested technology, and safety trials still ongoing, is it safe to take the shot? And does it even work? And does a disease with an IFR of 0.2% even justify that risk?

[snip]

Covid is the umbrella label for PCR “positive” people regardless of clinical presentation. Most are “asymptomatic,”some have generic cold/flu symptoms, and a few present with moderate or severe respiratory distress. Unfortunately, the PCR assays being used for diagnosis, are not fit for purpose. Most PCR assays are constructed based on the German Drosten et al. protocol.

On November 27th 2020, 22 scientists submitted a request for retraction of this protocol which was published in the journal Eurosurveillance, citing a number of fatal design flaws.

It is also important to note, despite SarsCov2 virus and the syndrome labelled as Covid being used interchangeably, causation has not been proven as per Koch’s postulates.

The first metric which every medical doctor must convey to a person is how deadly Covid actually is. This is context for the legal and ethical practice of informed consent.

Incidentally, all Covid death stats are inflated: under direction of the WHO, deaths ‘from” and incidentally “with” Covid are not distinguished. Death coding has changed compared to Influenza/Pneumonia. According to one published analysis, this has resulted in over 16 times inflation of death stats, as supported by CDC data.

View attachment 476013
**

Full article here:

Synthetic mRNA Covid vaccines: A Risk-Benefit Analysis

With a “vaccine” based on untested technology, and safety trials still ongoing, is it safe to take the shot? And does it even work? And does a disease with an IFR of 0.2% even justify that risk?…

off-guardian.org

 

[phoenyx]

The following quote is from an article published in February, but I think it brings up issues that are still quite relevant today...
**
Sadaf Gilani
Feb 22, 2021

With a “vaccine” based on untested technology, and safety trials still ongoing, is it safe to take the shot? And does it even work? And does a disease with an IFR of 0.2% even justify that risk?

[snip]

Covid is the umbrella label for PCR “positive” people regardless of clinical presentation. Most are “asymptomatic,”some have generic cold/flu symptoms, and a few present with moderate or severe respiratory distress. Unfortunately, the PCR assays being used for diagnosis, are not fit for purpose. Most PCR assays are constructed based on the German Drosten et al. protocol.

On November 27th 2020, 22 scientists submitted a request for retraction of this protocol which was published in the journal Eurosurveillance, citing a number of fatal design flaws.

It is also important to note, despite SarsCov2 virus and the syndrome labelled as Covid being used interchangeably, causation has not been proven as per Koch’s postulates.

The first metric which every medical doctor must convey to a person is how deadly Covid actually is. This is context for the legal and ethical practice of informed consent.

Incidentally, all Covid death stats are inflated: under direction of the WHO, deaths ‘from” and incidentally “with” Covid are not distinguished. Death coding has changed compared to Influenza/Pneumonia. According to one published analysis, this has resulted in over 16 times inflation of death stats, as supported by CDC data.

View attachment 476013
**

Full article here:

Synthetic mRNA Covid vaccines: A Risk-Benefit Analysis

With a “vaccine” based on untested technology, and safety trials still ongoing, is it safe to take the shot? And does it even work? And does a disease with an IFR of 0.2% even justify that risk?…

off-guardian.org

He makes some good points to be sure.

 

[theHawk]

The following quote is from an article published in February, but I think it brings up issues that are still quite relevant today...
**
Sadaf Gilani
Feb 22, 2021

With a “vaccine” based on untested technology, and safety trials still ongoing, is it safe to take the shot? And does it even work? And does a disease with an IFR of 0.2% even justify that risk?

[snip]

Covid is the umbrella label for PCR “positive” people regardless of clinical presentation. Most are “asymptomatic,”some have generic cold/flu symptoms, and a few present with moderate or severe respiratory distress. Unfortunately, the PCR assays being used for diagnosis, are not fit for purpose. Most PCR assays are constructed based on the German Drosten et al. protocol.

On November 27th 2020, 22 scientists submitted a request for retraction of this protocol which was published in the journal Eurosurveillance, citing a number of fatal design flaws.

It is also important to note, despite SarsCov2 virus and the syndrome labelled as Covid being used interchangeably, causation has not been proven as per Koch’s postulates.

The first metric which every medical doctor must convey to a person is how deadly Covid actually is. This is context for the legal and ethical practice of informed consent.

Incidentally, all Covid death stats are inflated: under direction of the WHO, deaths ‘from” and incidentally “with” Covid are not distinguished. Death coding has changed compared to Influenza/Pneumonia. According to one published analysis, this has resulted in over 16 times inflation of death stats, as supported by CDC data.

View attachment 476013
**

Full article here:

Synthetic mRNA Covid vaccines: A Risk-Benefit Analysis

With a “vaccine” based on untested technology, and safety trials still ongoing, is it safe to take the shot? And does it even work? And does a disease with an IFR of 0.2% even justify that risk?…

off-guardian.org

It can also cause Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP).

A friend of mine developed it after getting the Moderna vaccine shot. He would had died if he waited another day or so before going to the emergency room and getting his blood tested.


Here’s a story of a 22 year old getting ITP:

Error - Cookies Turned Off

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

Of course the media claims it only happens to 1 out of 100,000 vaccines. The media claims these deaths are not related, which is a flat out lie. ITP has happened with other vaccines before, so it is a fairly common thing to happen and is a known reaction to viruses as well as vaccines. Facebook recently took down a group that was 70k strong that was made for people who experience these issues.

 

[Snouter]

Starting around 20:00 Dr. Ryan Cole indicates 6, 9, 12 months down the road various diseases can occur, particularly autoimmune diseases (the body attacks itself) which are among the worst diseases. That is if you survive the first day or so which is not always the case unfortunately. It is funny the well know remedy, Ivermectin, is still "being studied" while totally unproven RNA tweaking "jabs" are demanded. D3 and Zinc is a much safer approach to protecting your health than fucking with your immune system with the Dr. Fraudi, RNA tweaking crap. And of course, Congress passed laws so nobody can sue "vaccine' companies for adverse effects. Therefore, why doesn't the government make things like Ivermectin over the counter? It sounds as powerful as something like Narcan in terms of reversing a bad situation quickly.

Wowsa, back in the day Ivermectim, created in Japan, was a "wonder drug." Now it is "unproven" according to the "World Health Organization," the FDA, and fake pharma controlled fake governments.

Ivermectin, ‘Wonder drug’ from Japan: the human use perspective

Discovered in the late-1970s, the pioneering drug ivermectin, a dihydro derivative of avermectin—originating solely from a single microorganism isolated at the Kitasato Intitute, Tokyo, Japan from Japanese soil—has had an immeasurably ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[Thoth001]

vaccine Russian roulette

vaccine russian roulette

⁣To those who got injected with this substance: GOOD LUCK, you gonna need it

ourtube.co.uk

 

[Thoth001]

Starting around 20:00 Dr. Ryan Cole indicates 6, 9, 12 months down the road various diseases can occur, particularly autoimmune diseases (the body attacks itself) which are among the worst diseases. That is if you survive the first day or so which is not always the case unfortunately. It is funny the well know remedy, Ivermectin, is still "being studied" while totally unproven RNA tweaking "jabs" are demanded. D3 and Zinc is a much safer approach to protecting your health than fucking with your immune system with the Dr. Fraudi, RNA tweaking crap. And of course, Congress passed laws so nobody can sue "vaccine' companies for adverse effects. Therefore, why doesn't the government make things like Ivermectin over the counter? It sounds as powerful as something like Narcan in terms of reversing a bad situation quickly.

Wowsa, back in the day Ivermectim, created in Japan, was a "wonder drug." Now it is "unproven" according to the "World Health Organization," the FDA, and fake pharma controlled fake governments.

Ivermectin, ‘Wonder drug’ from Japan: the human use perspective

Discovered in the late-1970s, the pioneering drug ivermectin, a dihydro derivative of avermectin—originating solely from a single microorganism isolated at the Kitasato Intitute, Tokyo, Japan from Japanese soil—has had an immeasurably ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Great points!! And all one has to do is look back at the history on how this Pharma cartel was created. It all stems back to the early 1900's.

The History of the Pharma Cartel - Dr. Rath Health Foundation

1911, May 15 The Supreme Court of the U.S. finds John Rockefeller and his Trust guilty of corruption, illegal business practices and racketeering. As a result […]

www.dr-rath-foundation.org

And Bill Gates is the latest psychopath and snake oil salesmen which I am sure is connected to the Rockefellers in many ways.

 

[Whodatsaywhodat.]

Starting around 20:00 Dr. Ryan Cole indicates 6, 9, 12 months down the road various diseases can occur, particularly autoimmune diseases (the body attacks itself) which are among the worst diseases. That is if you survive the first day or so which is not always the case unfortunately. It is funny the well know remedy, Ivermectin, is still "being studied" while totally unproven RNA tweaking "jabs" are demanded. D3 and Zinc is a much safer approach to protecting your health than fucking with your immune system with the Dr. Fraudi, RNA tweaking crap. And of course, Congress passed laws so nobody can sue "vaccine' companies for adverse effects. Therefore, why doesn't the government make things like Ivermectin over the counter? It sounds as powerful as something like Narcan in terms of reversing a bad situation quickly.

Wowsa, back in the day Ivermectim, created in Japan, was a "wonder drug." Now it is "unproven" according to the "World Health Organization," the FDA, and fake pharma controlled fake governments.

Ivermectin, ‘Wonder drug’ from Japan: the human use perspective

Discovered in the late-1970s, the pioneering drug ivermectin, a dihydro derivative of avermectin—originating solely from a single microorganism isolated at the Kitasato Intitute, Tokyo, Japan from Japanese soil—has had an immeasurably ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov