M14 Shooter
The Light of Truth
She'd rather engage in partisan trolling.Instead of bitching on the internet, how about you call your congresscritters and tell them to fix the damn law.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She'd rather engage in partisan trolling.Instead of bitching on the internet, how about you call your congresscritters and tell them to fix the damn law.
STILL
Not one single Republican has found this to be problematic.
Vets don't mean shit to you people.
"Thank you for your service" is "virtue signaling
I’m talking about Republicans on this site doofus.How about you prove that any republican, in a position of power, was aware of this case. I'm sure you wasn't until you ran across the article.
.
haha the link is in your OP…read the opinion you dumb duckLink
I’m talking about Republicans on this site doofus.
But good point. None in Congress seem to give a shot either
wow you are such an idiot...like you started this thread...abvout this case...and you clearly didn't read it...https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-432_f2bh.pdfQuote that from the OP liar. It ain’t there
That’s the date of the fucking CLAIM you moron. Not the legislation.wow you are such an idiot...like you started this thread...abvout this case...and you clearly didn't read it...https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-432_f2bh.pdf
You lost what little credibility you had:
"
This case concerns the effective date of an award of disability compensation to a veteran of the United States military. Approximately 30 years
after Adolfo Arellano’s honorable discharge from the Navy, Arellano
applied to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for disability compensation based on his psychiatric disorders. A VA regional office
granted Arellano service-connected disability benefits after finding
that his disorders resulted from trauma that he suffered while serving
on an aircraft carrier. Applying the default rule in 38 U. S. C.
§5110(a)(1), the VA assigned an effective date of June 3, 2011 —the day that the agency received his claim—"
Who's Admin was running the VA in 2011?
and which admin rejected it again?That’s the date of the fucking CLAIM you moron. Not the legislation.
Jesus what a dope
When a meathead decides to join they should implement a " You're on your own" like docs do with the anesthesia use permission slip.
This Court is a disaster. Barrett was the driving force behind this decision but all three "liberal" Justices joined in it
Then why the fuck do they post anything?
The issue in the case is the EFFECTIVE DATE, which was set by the Obama admin. Why is this so hard for you to simply read the opinion?That’s the date of the fucking CLAIM you moron. Not the legislation.
Jesus what a dope
Slate is what you people call news?Good article by Mark Joseph Stern for Slate Magazine. He is right.
Well, when they have a good article, with good analysis, they are.Slate is what you people call news?
When you have an opinion I agree with you will be the first to know.Well, when they have a good article, with good analysis, they are.
The Obama Admin did not insert itself into particular cases jack ass. That date was set by the VAThe issue in the case is the EFFECTIVE DATE, which was set by the Obama admin. Why is this so hard for you to simply read the opinion?
This case concerns the effective date of an award of disability compensation to a veteran of the United States military
the VA assigned an effective date of June 3, 2011
holy fuck…who ran the VA in 2011? who set the effective date? The Obama admin ran the VA in 2011 you idiotThe Obama Admin did not insert itself into particular cases jack ass. That date was set by the VA
So now you claim that every single decision made by the VA for eight years came from the White House?holy fuck…who ran the VA in 2011? who set the effective date? The Obama admin ran the VA in 2011 you idiot