Supreme court rules in favor of Trump's genocide of in person voting during a world wide pandemic that helps Republicans

[OldLady]

Voting during a pandemic: Wisconsin's election 'boggles the mind' Why not absentee ballots? No good reason of course. It just means less democrat votes. Which is the whole point. The supreme court of the five yes votes, were voting for Trump, and voting to endanger those whose absentee ballots never got to the voters in time. and we all know why that was. The five Trump judges, along with Trump, have blood on their hands.

The article said the decision helps Republicans. In what way?

How many Democrats are going to do in person voting while there is a pandemic?

How many Republicans are? Do you really think the people defending the President here are anything but talk?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Voting during a pandemic: Wisconsin's election 'boggles the mind' Why not absentee ballots? No good reason of course. It just means less democrat votes. Which is the whole point. The supreme court of the five yes votes, were voting for Trump, and voting to endanger those whose absentee ballots never got to the voters in time. and we all know why that was. The five Trump judges, along with Trump, have blood on their hands.

The article said the decision helps Republicans. In what way?

In person voting marginally reduces the ability to commit fraud.

 

[BWK]

Why is this benefitting Republicans?

It's a primary that reflects the optics against the Democrat candidates running in November.

 

[BWK]

Voting during a pandemic: Wisconsin's election 'boggles the mind' Why not absentee ballots? No good reason of course. It just means less democrat votes. Which is the whole point. The supreme court of the five yes votes, were voting for Trump, and voting to endanger those whose absentee ballots never got to the voters in time. and we all know why that was. The five Trump judges, along with Trump, have blood on their hands.

The article said the decision helps Republicans. In what way?

In person voting marginally reduces the ability to commit fraud.

Negative! In person voting decided the election when 868 polls were closed in the south in minority areas. Along with the voter purge that stole over a million votes illegally, when those people couldn't cast a vote.

 

[DGS49]

So in summary, there is no conceivable way that this benefits the Republicans; the Governor has no authority to make the change he tried to make (as confirmed by the top courts in Wisconsin and the United States); there is no indication that the perceived dangers will affect any particular party or demographic more or less than any other.

So what is the problem?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

It just means less democrat votes.

"fewer".

It doesn't matter. This is a primary election. If there are fewer democrat votes it means fewer voters will be deciding between Bernie and Joe. Trump is running unopposed. The turnout doesn't affect him at all.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

We already have a thread on this