Supreme Court: Coach Can Pray on the Sidelines. Ruling 6-3

Status
Not open for further replies.
FIrst amendment. Have you ever read it? "no law respecting an establishment of religion".

Don't feel bad. Six justices didn't read it either.
That's not what you claimed. Nor is allowing prayer of any kind the establishment of anything, much less an entire state religion. Try again.
 
FIrst amendment. Have you ever read it? "no law respecting an establishment of religion".

Don't feel bad. Six justices didn't read it either.
And the justices who made the correct decision did read it. Unlike you, they understood it, too! 😎
 
Apparently 3 hypocrite Justices dissented. What were they thinking? Congress can say a freaking prayer but a football coach can't.
Congress allow opening statements from anyone, even non-religious people.

The coach doesn't. It's evangelical Christianity or nothing.

Honest people admit to the stark difference, that one of those things is not like the others.
 
Well yes. 99% of them will freak out totally. After all, they always have in the past. The surest way to get a conservative to halt public prayer is to allow it from any religion.
Pointing to the stereotypes you keep in your head to fuel your irrational hatred is proof of nothing but you're irrational.
 
Congress allow opening statements from anyone, even non-religious people.

The coach doesn't. It's evangelical Christianity or nothing.

Honest people admit to the stark difference, that one of those things is not like the others.

How do you know what the coach does or doesn't?

I'm Christian and have absolutely no problem with people of other faith praying
 
You’re a babbling fool.
Anything else?
From you? No. Don’t believe I asked anything of you in the first place. I do understand your desperation to talk with me though. It is an honor and a privilege so I hope you enjoyed yourself
 
So they're not saying states can ban abortion?

So no state will ban abortion now that this ruling has been passed?
Nice try but that isn't what your statement said, is it? You plainly stated the ruling bans abortion. I'm sure it was just a little slip, huh?
 

"US Supreme Court: Should this coach have been punished for praying?"

The Supreme Court is going all in for right wing policies right now.

Allowing abortion to be banned, being pro-gun, being pro-religion anywhere and everywhere. What next?

And what are the inevitable consequences?
Civil War? A change in the way the government is set up?
Lie. Abortion isn't a Constitutional issue. States will either legalize Abortion or make abortion illegal in their state.
Praying is a Constitutional right, freedom of religion.
If those two decisions provoke a civil war, then so be it. Both decisions are Constitutional.
 
15th post
Congress allow opening statements from anyone, even non-religious people.

The coach doesn't. It's evangelical Christianity or nothing.

Honest people admit to the stark difference, that one of those things is not like the others.
How do you know the coach doesn't?

Oh, right, your stereotypes again. Y'know, when you let them do your thinking for you, no actual thinking gets done.
 
Speaking the word "god" in a public place is not establishing a religion.
No one ever said it was. That's just one of your dishonest deflections.

Now, a government agent pressuring a captive crowd clearly is establishing a religion.

I hope you won't embarrass yourself by denying that, but I'm sure you will.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom