2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 111,973
- 52,245
- 2,290
Yep.....9-0 decision against the democrats......so now we are going to hear calls for packing the court again..right...even with a 9-0 decision...
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Supreme Court 9-0 tells liz warren and illegal immigration supporters to get lost.....democrats think 30 more justices needed to make this right.
- Thread starter 2aguy
- Start date
Bootney Lee Farnsworth
Diamond Member
Kagan’s conclusion is blunt: U.S. law “generally requires a lawful admission before a person can obtain LPR status. Sanchez was not lawfully admitted, and his TPS does not alter that fact. He therefore cannot become a permanent resident of this country.”
This decision will come as a blow to many Democrats. Sens. Mazi Hirono (D-Hawaii), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) joined Reps. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.), Adriano Espaillat (D-N.Y.), Darren Soto (D-Fla.), and Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) in supporting Sanchez’s claim. Democrat attorneys general for Washington, D.C., Massachusetts, California, and 17 other states also backed the illegal immigration loophole.
Kagan’s opinion represents a blunt refutation of this sleight-of-hand attempt to undermine immigration law.
Man, that's giving those commie fucks the middle finger in unison.
This decision will come as a blow to many Democrats. Sens. Mazi Hirono (D-Hawaii), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) joined Reps. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.), Adriano Espaillat (D-N.Y.), Darren Soto (D-Fla.), and Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) in supporting Sanchez’s claim. Democrat attorneys general for Washington, D.C., Massachusetts, California, and 17 other states also backed the illegal immigration loophole.
Kagan’s opinion represents a blunt refutation of this sleight-of-hand attempt to undermine immigration law.
Man, that's giving those commie fucks the middle finger in unison.
You clearly don’t understand the case. That said, there is nothing important that has been newly decided where the trumpkin appointees don’t destroy the decision making process of the court. Trumpkins wouldn’t understand stare decisis if it bit them.Yep.....9-0 decision against the democrats......so now we are going to hear calls for packing the court again..right...even with a 9-0 decision...
there is no constitutional provision setting the number of justices. Maybe if you don’t like it, your christofascist scum shouldn’t have stolen two judgeships
Bootney Lee Farnsworth
Diamond Member
What?You clearly don’t understand the case. That said, there is nothing important that has been newly decided where the trumpkin appointees don’t destroy the decision making process of the court. Trumpkins wouldn’t understand stare decisis if it bit them.Yep.....9-0 decision against the democrats......so now we are going to hear calls for packing the court again..right...even with a 9-0 decision...
there is no constitutional provision setting the number of justices. Maybe if you don’t like it, your christofascist scum shouldn’t have stolen two judgeships
That was a rant from hell on everything BUT the topic.
AMart
Diamond Member
- Dec 29, 2020
- 12,030
- 12,450
- 2,288
Unfortunately these people on temp status are never ordered to go home. SCOTUS basically told Trump yeah you have the authority to order these people back home but you were kinda mean about it and didn't give them enough time to plan. If Trump was in office it would have not been 9-0.
- Banned
- #6
Point of Order..
The words "democrat" and "think" should never be used in the same sentence.
.
The words "democrat" and "think" should never be used in the same sentence.
.
No, you are merely misquoting the article statement...Yep.....9-0 decision against the democrats......so now we are going to hear calls for packing the court again..right...even with a 9-0 decision...
Kagan’s opinion represents a blunt refutation of this sleight-of-hand attempt to undermine immigration law. Jonathan Turley has suggested that the Court’s recent string of unanimous decisions like this one may be a subtle message to Democrats, warning them against packing the Supreme Court. While Turley has a point, the Supreme Court often hands down unanimous decisions — yet these decisions do not often gain the same coverage as 5-4 rulings on controversial issues.
Of which, stacking the court is not an issue since it was not approved for consideration by the Democratic Party leadership that controls Congress.
- May 20, 2009
- 144,425
- 66,819
- 2,330
You clearly don’t understand the case. That said, there is nothing important that has been newly decided where the trumpkin appointees don’t destroy the decision making process of the court. Trumpkins wouldn’t understand stare decisis if it bit them.Yep.....9-0 decision against the democrats......so now we are going to hear calls for packing the court again..right...even with a 9-0 decision...
there is no constitutional provision setting the number of justices. Maybe if you don’t like it, your christofascist scum shouldn’t have stolen two judgeships
So Trump could have appointed 10 new Justices? Really?
Ask you imaginary lawyer friend jillian
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 111,973
- 52,245
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #9
You clearly don’t understand the case. That said, there is nothing important that has been newly decided where the trumpkin appointees don’t destroy the decision making process of the court. Trumpkins wouldn’t understand stare decisis if it bit them.Yep.....9-0 decision against the democrats......so now we are going to hear calls for packing the court again..right...even with a 9-0 decision...
there is no constitutional provision setting the number of justices. Maybe if you don’t like it, your christofascist scum shouldn’t have stolen two judgeships
What part of 9-0 do you not understand....that means the fascist Justices also agreed this was a dumb case....you twit...
- Jun 18, 2009
- 34,338
- 18,631
- 1,915
What really needs to happen is the removal of the clause that says someone entering this country illegally is provided a temporary protected status.
Entering the country illegally should be a disqualifier for any protected status and be an absolute ban to permanent citizenship.
Entering the country illegally should be a disqualifier for any protected status and be an absolute ban to permanent citizenship.
Jimmy_Chitwood
Platinum Member
You clearly don’t understand the case. That said, there is nothing important that has been newly decided where the trumpkin appointees don’t destroy the decision making process of the court. Trumpkins wouldn’t understand stare decisis if it bit them.Yep.....9-0 decision against the democrats......so now we are going to hear calls for packing the court again..right...even with a 9-0 decision...
there is no constitutional provision setting the number of justices. Maybe if you don’t like it, your christofascist scum shouldn’t have stolen two judgeships
Can you post a version for english speakers?
Or repost when not drunk?
Please?
TIA.
"Kagan’s conclusion is blunt: U.S. law “generally requires a lawful admission before a person can obtain LPR status. Sanchez was not lawfully admitted, and his TPS does not alter that fact. He therefore cannot become a permanent resident of this country.”
Suck on it Dimocrats!
Suck on it Dimocrats!
JusticeHammer
Platinum Member
- Apr 20, 2017
- 6,901
- 4,106
- 940
You like all Dems are stupid mf's.You clearly don’t understand the case. That said, there is nothing important that has been newly decided where the trumpkin appointees don’t destroy the decision making process of the court. Trumpkins wouldn’t understand stare decisis if it bit them.Yep.....9-0 decision against the democrats......so now we are going to hear calls for packing the court again..right...even with a 9-0 decision...
there is no constitutional provision setting the number of justices. Maybe if you don’t like it, your christofascist scum shouldn’t have stolen two judgeships
Jimmy_Chitwood
Platinum Member
Yep.....9-0 decision against the democrats......so now we are going to hear calls for packing the court again..right...even with a 9-0 decision...
Warren
Concerned American
Diamond Member
So it is OK with you to for a fraud to inhabit the WH, but legally appointed justices are not. Get the fuck outta here commie.You clearly don’t understand the case. That said, there is nothing important that has been newly decided where the trumpkin appointees don’t destroy the decision making process of the court. Trumpkins wouldn’t understand stare decisis if it bit them.Yep.....9-0 decision against the democrats......so now we are going to hear calls for packing the court again..right...even with a 9-0 decision...
there is no constitutional provision setting the number of justices. Maybe if you don’t like it, your christofascist scum shouldn’t have stolen two judgeships
- Oct 31, 2012
- 54,052
- 53,067
- 3,605
Na. All they have to do is justice Alito them all as they are all found in bed with a pillow over their collective faces.Yep.....9-0 decision against the democrats......so now we are going to hear calls for packing the court again..right...even with a 9-0 decision...
Wyatt earp
Diamond Member
- Apr 21, 2012
- 69,975
- 16,383
- 2,180
You don't understand why the supreme court has been ruling 9 to 0 recentlyYou clearly don’t understand the case. That said, there is nothing important that has been newly decided where the trumpkin appointees don’t destroy the decision making process of the court. Trumpkins wouldn’t understand stare decisis if it bit them.Yep.....9-0 decision against the democrats......so now we are going to hear calls for packing the court again..right...even with a 9-0 decision...
there is no constitutional provision setting the number of justices. Maybe if you don’t like it, your christofascist scum shouldn’t have stolen two judgeships
Similar threads
- Replies
- 254
- Views
- 6K
- Replies
- 126
- Views
- 3K
- Replies
- 150
- Views
- 4K
- Replies
- 65
- Views
- 1K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 776
- Views
- 5K
- Replies
- 9
- Views
- 231
- Replies
- 82
- Views
- 1K
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8075
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 471
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-