Supreme Court 9-0 tells liz warren and illegal immigration supporters to get lost.....democrats think 30 more justices needed to make this right.

[2aguy]

Yep.....9-0 decision against the democrats......so now we are going to hear calls for packing the court again..right...even with a 9-0 decision...

KAGAN Writes 9-0 Supreme Court Opinion Rejecting Liz Warren's Subversion of Immigration Law

On Monday, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected an illegal immigrant’s attempt to twist immi

pjmedia.com

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Kagan’s conclusion is blunt: U.S. law “generally requires a lawful admission before a person can obtain LPR status. Sanchez was not lawfully admitted, and his TPS does not alter that fact. He therefore cannot become a permanent resident of this country.”

This decision will come as a blow to many Democrats. Sens. Mazi Hirono (D-Hawaii), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) joined Reps. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.), Adriano Espaillat (D-N.Y.), Darren Soto (D-Fla.), and Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) in supporting Sanchez’s claim. Democrat attorneys general for Washington, D.C., Massachusetts, California, and 17 other states also backed the illegal immigration loophole.

Kagan’s opinion represents a blunt refutation of this sleight-of-hand attempt to undermine immigration law.

Man, that's giving those commie ***** the middle finger in unison.

 

[jillian]

Yep.....9-0 decision against the democrats......so now we are going to hear calls for packing the court again..right...even with a 9-0 decision...

KAGAN Writes 9-0 Supreme Court Opinion Rejecting Liz Warren's Subversion of Immigration Law

On Monday, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected an illegal immigrant’s attempt to twist immi

pjmedia.com

You clearly don’t understand the case. That said, there is nothing important that has been newly decided where the trumpkin appointees don’t destroy the decision making process of the court. Trumpkins wouldn’t understand stare decisis if it bit them.

there is no constitutional provision setting the number of justices. Maybe if you don’t like it, your christofascist scum shouldn’t have stolen two judgeships

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Yep.....9-0 decision against the democrats......so now we are going to hear calls for packing the court again..right...even with a 9-0 decision...

KAGAN Writes 9-0 Supreme Court Opinion Rejecting Liz Warren's Subversion of Immigration Law

On Monday, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected an illegal immigrant’s attempt to twist immi

pjmedia.com

You clearly don’t understand the case. That said, there is nothing important that has been newly decided where the trumpkin appointees don’t destroy the decision making process of the court. Trumpkins wouldn’t understand stare decisis if it bit them.

there is no constitutional provision setting the number of justices. Maybe if you don’t like it, your christofascist scum shouldn’t have stolen two judgeships

What?


That was a rant from hell on everything BUT the topic.

 

[AMart]

Unfortunately these people on temp status are never ordered to go home. SCOTUS basically told Trump yeah you have the authority to order these people back home but you were kinda mean about it and didn't give them enough time to plan. If Trump was in office it would have not been 9-0.

 

[Pete7469]

Point of Order..

The words "democrat" and "think" should never be used in the same sentence.


.

 

[Moonglow]

Yep.....9-0 decision against the democrats......so now we are going to hear calls for packing the court again..right...even with a 9-0 decision...

KAGAN Writes 9-0 Supreme Court Opinion Rejecting Liz Warren's Subversion of Immigration Law

On Monday, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected an illegal immigrant’s attempt to twist immi

pjmedia.com

No, you are merely misquoting the article statement...

Kagan’s opinion represents a blunt refutation of this sleight-of-hand attempt to undermine immigration law. Jonathan Turley has suggested that the Court’s recent string of unanimous decisions like this one may be a subtle message to Democrats, warning them against packing the Supreme Court. While Turley has a point, the Supreme Court often hands down unanimous decisions — yet these decisions do not often gain the same coverage as 5-4 rulings on controversial issues.

Of which, stacking the court is not an issue since it was not approved for consideration by the Democratic Party leadership that controls Congress.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Yep.....9-0 decision against the democrats......so now we are going to hear calls for packing the court again..right...even with a 9-0 decision...

KAGAN Writes 9-0 Supreme Court Opinion Rejecting Liz Warren's Subversion of Immigration Law

On Monday, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected an illegal immigrant’s attempt to twist immi

pjmedia.com

You clearly don’t understand the case. That said, there is nothing important that has been newly decided where the trumpkin appointees don’t destroy the decision making process of the court. Trumpkins wouldn’t understand stare decisis if it bit them.

there is no constitutional provision setting the number of justices. Maybe if you don’t like it, your christofascist scum shouldn’t have stolen two judgeships

So Trump could have appointed 10 new Justices? Really?

Ask you imaginary lawyer friend jillian

 

[2aguy]

Yep.....9-0 decision against the democrats......so now we are going to hear calls for packing the court again..right...even with a 9-0 decision...

KAGAN Writes 9-0 Supreme Court Opinion Rejecting Liz Warren's Subversion of Immigration Law

On Monday, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected an illegal immigrant’s attempt to twist immi

pjmedia.com

You clearly don’t understand the case. That said, there is nothing important that has been newly decided where the trumpkin appointees don’t destroy the decision making process of the court. Trumpkins wouldn’t understand stare decisis if it bit them.

there is no constitutional provision setting the number of justices. Maybe if you don’t like it, your christofascist scum shouldn’t have stolen two judgeships

What part of 9-0 do you not understand....that means the fascist Justices also agreed this was a dumb case....you twit...

 

[Darkwind]

What really needs to happen is the removal of the clause that says someone entering this country illegally is provided a temporary protected status.

Entering the country illegally should be a disqualifier for any protected status and be an absolute ban to permanent citizenship.

 

[2aguy]

Point of Order..

The words "democrat" and "think" should never be used in the same sentence.


.

Or decency, or moral, or law abiding, or intelligent....

 

[Jimmy_Chitwood]

Yep.....9-0 decision against the democrats......so now we are going to hear calls for packing the court again..right...even with a 9-0 decision...

KAGAN Writes 9-0 Supreme Court Opinion Rejecting Liz Warren's Subversion of Immigration Law

On Monday, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected an illegal immigrant’s attempt to twist immi

pjmedia.com

You clearly don’t understand the case. That said, there is nothing important that has been newly decided where the trumpkin appointees don’t destroy the decision making process of the court. Trumpkins wouldn’t understand stare decisis if it bit them.

there is no constitutional provision setting the number of justices. Maybe if you don’t like it, your christofascist scum shouldn’t have stolen two judgeships

Can you post a version for english speakers?

Or repost when not drunk?

Please?

TIA.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

"Kagan’s conclusion is blunt: U.S. law “generally requires a lawful admission before a person can obtain LPR status. Sanchez was not lawfully admitted, and his TPS does not alter that fact. He therefore cannot become a permanent resident of this country.”


Suck on it Dimocrats!

 

[JusticeHammer]

Yep.....9-0 decision against the democrats......so now we are going to hear calls for packing the court again..right...even with a 9-0 decision...

KAGAN Writes 9-0 Supreme Court Opinion Rejecting Liz Warren's Subversion of Immigration Law

On Monday, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected an illegal immigrant’s attempt to twist immi

pjmedia.com

You clearly don’t understand the case. That said, there is nothing important that has been newly decided where the trumpkin appointees don’t destroy the decision making process of the court. Trumpkins wouldn’t understand stare decisis if it bit them.

there is no constitutional provision setting the number of justices. Maybe if you don’t like it, your christofascist scum shouldn’t have stolen two judgeships

You like all Dems are stupid mf's.

 

[WEATHER53]

Libbies need to start impeachment hearings against the judges for not allowing what libbies feel is right.

 

[Jimmy_Chitwood]

Yep.....9-0 decision against the democrats......so now we are going to hear calls for packing the court again..right...even with a 9-0 decision...

KAGAN Writes 9-0 Supreme Court Opinion Rejecting Liz Warren's Subversion of Immigration Law

On Monday, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected an illegal immigrant’s attempt to twist immi

pjmedia.com

Warren

 

[Concerned American]

Yep.....9-0 decision against the democrats......so now we are going to hear calls for packing the court again..right...even with a 9-0 decision...

KAGAN Writes 9-0 Supreme Court Opinion Rejecting Liz Warren's Subversion of Immigration Law

On Monday, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected an illegal immigrant’s attempt to twist immi

pjmedia.com

You clearly don’t understand the case. That said, there is nothing important that has been newly decided where the trumpkin appointees don’t destroy the decision making process of the court. Trumpkins wouldn’t understand stare decisis if it bit them.

there is no constitutional provision setting the number of justices. Maybe if you don’t like it, your christofascist scum shouldn’t have stolen two judgeships

So it is OK with you to for a fraud to inhabit the WH, but legally appointed justices are not. Get the **** outta here commie.

 

[Votto]

Yep.....9-0 decision against the democrats......so now we are going to hear calls for packing the court again..right...even with a 9-0 decision...

KAGAN Writes 9-0 Supreme Court Opinion Rejecting Liz Warren's Subversion of Immigration Law

On Monday, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected an illegal immigrant’s attempt to twist immi

pjmedia.com

Na. All they have to do is justice Alito them all as they are all found in bed with a pillow over their collective faces.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Yep.....9-0 decision against the democrats......so now we are going to hear calls for packing the court again..right...even with a 9-0 decision...

KAGAN Writes 9-0 Supreme Court Opinion Rejecting Liz Warren's Subversion of Immigration Law

On Monday, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected an illegal immigrant’s attempt to twist immi

pjmedia.com

You clearly don’t understand the case. That said, there is nothing important that has been newly decided where the trumpkin appointees don’t destroy the decision making process of the court. Trumpkins wouldn’t understand stare decisis if it bit them.

there is no constitutional provision setting the number of justices. Maybe if you don’t like it, your christofascist scum shouldn’t have stolen two judgeships

You don't understand why the supreme court has been ruling 9 to 0 recently

 

[struth]

folks this is not a “blow to dems”. they know for well illegals can’t get legal status

they want it

they want them to remain second tier “citizens”

This is no different then what they wanted for african- americans for decades