‘Blatantly Illegal’- Supreme Court Delivers a Bombshell 9-0 Ruling

Doc7505

Diamond Member
Feb 16, 2016
15,711
27,660
2,430

‘Blatantly Illegal’- Supreme Court Delivers a Bombshell 9-0 Ruling

21 Jun 2022 ~!~ By Kari Donovan

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that Democrat Joe Biden’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) violated drug reimbursement rules for low-income patients in a blistering decision that the media is largely ignoring.
President Donald J. Trump was in an epic battle with the HHS for his entire administration, wanting the massive and overblown agency to make better choices to serve the American people, and the left absolutely freaked out at the notion that a Government institution was not just a jobs program for them and their cronies- but was actually meant to serve the American people- effectively.
~Snip~
In the ruling, the court said the HHS, led by former California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, illegally cut prescription drug reimbursements to hospitals by $1.6 billion per year in connection with a program that was established to help poorer patients.
POLITICO called Becerra, ‘Trump’s health nemesis’ in a 2020 article detailing how Becerra was put in place to reverse Trump’s health policy, making this smack down especially fun to watch for supporters of Trump’s America First policies.
“Becerra, a former House lawmaker, would enter Biden’s HHS without traditional health or management experience – but with immense power to undo Trump’s actions,” Politico reported.
~Snip~
SCOTUS overturned a lower court’s 2020 decision that the U.S. HHS had the authority to reduce by $1.6 billion the yearly Medicare payments for outpatient drugs that had helped subsidize the operations of hospitals catering to the poor and disabled.
“At issue in the case was how HHS set Medicare reimbursement rates for certain prescription drugs in its so-called 340B drug program. The hospital industry group challenged a Trump-era rule that reduced the rates,” CNN reported.
The unanimous opinion was written by Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
“Supreme Court steps into international custody dispute, giving lower courts more discretion The court said HHS acted unlawfully in how it went about varying the rates,” Jon Daughtery wrote for Conservative Brief on Tuesday, explaining the court’s decision.​
“In short, the statute allows HHS to set reimbursement rates based on average price and affords the agency discretion to ‘adjust’ the price up or down. But unless HHS conducts a survey of hospitals’ acquisition costs, HHS may not vary the reimbursement rates by hospital group,” Kavanaugh wrote.​


Commentary:
Unanimous means a few of the justices who aren’t even qualified in a real sense to be on the court still made a mistake and got it right.
Oh the horrors.
You won't see the Quisling MSM printing much about this because it makes Joe Biden and his handpicked Maoist buddies look bad. Especially Xavier Becerra. Here is HHS directly harming the very people they claim to help or care about. Obamacare hurt Americans by taking 20% of their take home pay, it is just so expensive.
Becerra and HHS did not interpret the statute. Becerra willfully directed and disregarded the law in order to promote their Progressive agenda.
 
And my friends is what happens when you rely on biased news sources to tell you what to think.

If one were actually read the brief from the SCOTUS you would find the truth...

chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1114_09m1.pdf

This case was about reimbursement rate cuts starting in 2018. The lower court ruling that SCOTUS overturned was given in 2020. The actions that were said to be unlawful took place 2 years before Biden even won the election.

From the link I gave...the words of the SCOTUS....

HHS’s 2018 and 2019 reimbursement rates for 340B hospitals were therefore unlawful. The text and structure of the statute make this a straightforward case. Because HHS did not conduct a survey of hospitals’ acquisition costs, HHS acted unlawfully by reducing the reimbursement rates for 340B hospitals.

These "unlawful rate reductions" were put into place by Alex Azar, not Xavier Becerra.

So, yes this was a smackdown of an agency overstepping its power, an action that took place under Donald J Trump.
 
Becerra and HHS did not interpret the statute. Becerra willfully directed and disregarded the law in order to promote their Progressive agenda.

You are half right, the HHS did not interpret the statute. the HHS willfully directed and disregarded the law in order to promote their agenda. And it all happened under Alex Azar and Donald J Trump.
 
From what I've seen they would let the country be buried under a tidal wave of shit as long it was hot and sunny in their backyard.

The only thing they care about is their personal political and financial gain.

You are aware that this ruling is over actions by the Trump Admin....correct?

But you are right about one thing....the only thing the Dems care about is personal political and financial gain, then again the same thing is 100% true of the Repubs yet you are so blindly loyal to them.

Weird
 
notice how when it was pointed out that it was actually a Trump policy that was ruled illegal they all scurry away like roaches when you turn on the light?
I'll disagree with you in this case. They're not that sophisticated. You're giving them too much credit.

The OP latches on to any and everything that looks like it may be bad news for President Biden or the democrats and tries to make it sound as if a report of Biden having toenail fungus was the same thing s the Teapot Dome scandal. My relationship to this board is basically the same as a morbid curiosity of what they'll come up with next in that vein.

Supreme Court rulings are seldom cut and dried nor easily understood by legal experts. I think the OP and the legions of idiots who vote for Trump are confused as to what the ruling stated.
 
i notice you didn’t read the link in the OP

You are correct, I did not need some lying website to tell me what to think. I went to the actual ruling from SCOTUS and read it for myself.

you should try this and then you would know that the policy that was ruled illegal started in 2018, you do know who was the POTUS in 2018, right?
 
I'll disagree with you in this case. They're not that sophisticated. You're giving them too much credit.

The OP latches on to any and everything that looks like it may be bad news for President Biden or the democrats and tries to make it sound as if a report of Biden having toenail fungus was the same thing s the Teapot Dome scandal. My relationship to this board is basically the same as a morbid curiosity of what they'll come up with next in that vein.

Supreme Court rulings are seldom cut and dried nor easily understood by legal experts. I think the OP and the legions of idiots who vote for Trump are confused as to what the ruling stated.

Without a doubt, and then the link in the OP basically lied to them and they are all too stupid to know it
 

‘Blatantly Illegal’- Supreme Court Delivers a Bombshell 9-0 Ruling

21 Jun 2022 ~!~ By Kari Donovan

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that Democrat Joe Biden’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) violated drug reimbursement rules for low-income patients in a blistering decision that the media is largely ignoring.
President Donald J. Trump was in an epic battle with the HHS for his entire administration, wanting the massive and overblown agency to make better choices to serve the American people, and the left absolutely freaked out at the notion that a Government institution was not just a jobs program for them and their cronies- but was actually meant to serve the American people- effectively.
~Snip~
In the ruling, the court said the HHS, led by former California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, illegally cut prescription drug reimbursements to hospitals by $1.6 billion per year in connection with a program that was established to help poorer patients.
POLITICO called Becerra, ‘Trump’s health nemesis’ in a 2020 article detailing how Becerra was put in place to reverse Trump’s health policy, making this smack down especially fun to watch for supporters of Trump’s America First policies.
“Becerra, a former House lawmaker, would enter Biden’s HHS without traditional health or management experience – but with immense power to undo Trump’s actions,” Politico reported.
~Snip~
SCOTUS overturned a lower court’s 2020 decision that the U.S. HHS had the authority to reduce by $1.6 billion the yearly Medicare payments for outpatient drugs that had helped subsidize the operations of hospitals catering to the poor and disabled.
“At issue in the case was how HHS set Medicare reimbursement rates for certain prescription drugs in its so-called 340B drug program. The hospital industry group challenged a Trump-era rule that reduced the rates,” CNN reported.
The unanimous opinion was written by Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
“Supreme Court steps into international custody dispute, giving lower courts more discretion The court said HHS acted unlawfully in how it went about varying the rates,” Jon Daughtery wrote for Conservative Brief on Tuesday, explaining the court’s decision.​
“In short, the statute allows HHS to set reimbursement rates based on average price and affords the agency discretion to ‘adjust’ the price up or down. But unless HHS conducts a survey of hospitals’ acquisition costs, HHS may not vary the reimbursement rates by hospital group,” Kavanaugh wrote.​


Commentary:
Unanimous means a few of the justices who aren’t even qualified in a real sense to be on the court still made a mistake and got it right.
Oh the horrors.
You won't see the Quisling MSM printing much about this because it makes Joe Biden and his handpicked Maoist buddies look bad. Especially Xavier Becerra. Here is HHS directly harming the very people they claim to help or care about. Obamacare hurt Americans by taking 20% of their take home pay, it is just so expensive.
Becerra and HHS did not interpret the statute. Becerra willfully directed and disregarded the law in order to promote their Progressive agenda.
thank you so much for this information!

so now all those who never believed me that the Left don't give a flying rat's ass about the poor

Here is further proof (people shouldn't need this proof but you know how it is... not everyone is well-informed..)
 
But Democrats care about the people!!! :auiqs.jpg:
Actually, the dims do care about the people (taxpayers).. esp the ones who make HUGE money bc that means more $$ comes into the fed gov which they control

so yeh... they love the rich people who pay taxes to give them massive $$..

some are more equal than others
 
thank you so much for this information!

so now all those who never believed me that the Left don't give a flying rat's ass about the poor

Here is further proof (people shouldn't need this proof but you know how it is... not everyone is well-informed..)

Here....read the ruling for yourself and find out the OP lied to you.

chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1114_09m1.pdf

Of continue to live in abject ignorance.

Your choice
 
I'll take my news from people I've learned to trust, thank u

Why not think for yourself instead of letting someone else tell you what to think?

And your Law degree is from?

Why does one need a law degree to understand this...HHS’s 2018 and 2019 reimbursement rates for 340B hospitals were therefore unlawful. The text and structure of the statute make this a straightforward case. Because HHS did not conduct a survey of hospitals’ acquisition costs, HHS acted unlawfully by reducing the reimbursement rates for 340B hospitals.

Which part of that is confusing for you? Which of those words are too big for you to understand?
 
Why not think for yourself instead of letting someone else tell you what to think?



Why does one need a law degree to understand this...HHS’s 2018 and 2019 reimbursement rates for 340B hospitals were therefore unlawful. The text and structure of the statute make this a straightforward case. Because HHS did not conduct a survey of hospitals’ acquisition costs, HHS acted unlawfully by reducing the reimbursement rates for 340B hospitals.

Which part of that is confusing for you? Which of those words are too big for you to understand?
So, no law degree. Thanks.
 

Forum List

Back
Top