Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Based on what data?No amount of printing ie trillions and trillions and trillions is going to solve the problem if local and state govts keep this lockdown going. The number of deaths due to the virus will pale in comparison to the death from the upcoming depression. People had better wake up.
Great Depression Had Little Effect on Death Rates
Seriously? There will be no US currency if this lockdown continues. Entire supply lines are being bankrupt, dairy farms, farmers, food rotting on the ground. Do you not understand what is happening? Yes, and hundreds of thousands will be dying.
Studies come and goBased on what data?No amount of printing ie trillions and trillions and trillions is going to solve the problem if local and state govts keep this lockdown going. The number of deaths due to the virus will pale in comparison to the death from the upcoming depression. People had better wake up.
Great Depression Had Little Effect on Death Rates
academics must do studies or face having to find a real job
if it suites their agenda libs can whip up a new study contradicting their old study in no time at all
Based on what data?No amount of printing ie trillions and trillions and trillions is going to solve the problem if local and state govts keep this lockdown going. The number of deaths due to the virus will pale in comparison to the death from the upcoming depression. People had better wake up.
Great Depression Had Little Effect on Death Rates
Seriously? There will be no US currency if this lockdown continues. Entire supply lines are being bankrupt, dairy farms, farmers, food rotting on the ground. Do you not understand what is happening? Yes, and hundreds of thousands will be dying.
Based on what data? I just provided you information on the Great Depression. Hundreds of thousands DIDN'T die so where are you getting your apocolyptic predictions from?
Thousands ARE dying right now and it would be much, much worse if a majority of the country was not sheltered at home.
GOP cries "socialism save us!"GOP senator's coronavirus plan: Get federal government to cover 80 percent of wages.
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) wants the United States to follow Europe’s lead. That’s not something conservatives like him normally say, but he believes desperate times call for desperate measures.
The rising star on the right proposes that the federal government replicate what’s been working in the United Kingdom to keep layoffs limited and immediately begin covering 80 percent of worker wages at all private businesses, up to the national median wage, until the emergency caused by the novel coronavirus is over. He also advocates paying financial bonuses for businesses to rehire workers laid off over the past month.
....................................................................................................................................................
The magnitude of the impact to the economy from fighting the virus is truly unprecedented. The rationale for throwing the kitchen sink at preventing what would be a depression without government intervention is ultimately it is cheaper to prevent one than try to recover from one.
What I find telling is how quickly Repubs (who make claims to fiscal responsibility when a Dem is in the WH) propose what can fairly be described as socialist remedies under Repub admins. No amount of government debt is too much for a Repub when his party is at risk of being held accountable for a massive economic downturn.
When Shrub was prez, facing the start of a deep recession, Dems cooperated in passing TARP. When Obama took office and the Bush recession was in full swing, no Repub supported the stimulus package. Using the pretense it was too costly. How times have changed.
Based on what data?No amount of printing ie trillions and trillions and trillions is going to solve the problem if local and state govts keep this lockdown going. The number of deaths due to the virus will pale in comparison to the death from the upcoming depression. People had better wake up.
Great Depression Had Little Effect on Death Rates
Seriously? There will be no US currency if this lockdown continues. Entire supply lines are being bankrupt, dairy farms, farmers, food rotting on the ground. Do you not understand what is happening? Yes, and hundreds of thousands will be dying.
Based on what data? I just provided you information on the Great Depression. Hundreds of thousands DIDN'T die so where are you getting your apocolyptic predictions from?
Thousands ARE dying right now and it would be much, much worse if a majority of the country was not sheltered at home.
Yeah, they did, My grandparents lived through and saw a lot of death from the depression. Fortunately, most lived on farms back then and were self sufficient, unlike today.
And plunging the world into a second Great Depression would help that how?
What do you think happens when you keep printing money to pay for indebtedness and inflation starts setting in?
What do you think happens when you shut down the economy and leave everyone unemployed with no income?
I know exactly what happens, which is why I opposed it being shut down in the first place
No amount of printing ie trillions and trillions and trillions is going to solve the problem if local and state govts keep this lockdown going. The number of deaths due to the virus will pale in comparison to the death from the upcoming depression. People had better wake up.
GOP cries "socialism save us!"GOP senator's coronavirus plan: Get federal government to cover 80 percent of wages.
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) wants the United States to follow Europe’s lead. That’s not something conservatives like him normally say, but he believes desperate times call for desperate measures.
The rising star on the right proposes that the federal government replicate what’s been working in the United Kingdom to keep layoffs limited and immediately begin covering 80 percent of worker wages at all private businesses, up to the national median wage, until the emergency caused by the novel coronavirus is over. He also advocates paying financial bonuses for businesses to rehire workers laid off over the past month.
....................................................................................................................................................
The magnitude of the impact to the economy from fighting the virus is truly unprecedented. The rationale for throwing the kitchen sink at preventing what would be a depression without government intervention is ultimately it is cheaper to prevent one than try to recover from one.
What I find telling is how quickly Repubs (who make claims to fiscal responsibility when a Dem is in the WH) propose what can fairly be described as socialist remedies under Repub admins. No amount of government debt is too much for a Repub when his party is at risk of being held accountable for a massive economic downturn.
When Shrub was prez, facing the start of a deep recession, Dems cooperated in passing TARP. When Obama took office and the Bush recession was in full swing, no Repub supported the stimulus package. Using the pretense it was too costly. How times have changed.
If libs needed such a conclusion it would appear overnightStudies come and goBased on what data?No amount of printing ie trillions and trillions and trillions is going to solve the problem if local and state govts keep this lockdown going. The number of deaths due to the virus will pale in comparison to the death from the upcoming depression. People had better wake up.
Great Depression Had Little Effect on Death Rates
academics must do studies or face having to find a real job
if it suites their agenda libs can whip up a new study contradicting their old study in no time at all
So find one that says the Great Depression killed "hundreds of thousands". We'll wait.
No amount of printing ie trillions and trillions and trillions is going to solve the problem if local and state govts keep this lockdown going. The number of deaths due to the virus will pale in comparison to the death from the upcoming depression. People had better wake up.
They're not going to be able to keep this lockdown going for very much longer, no matter how much idle speculation the bureaucrats and eggheads indulge in. People simply will not tolerate that, and any politician who thinks it's possible to sustain a lockdown against the will of the people is just delusional.
If libs needed such a conclusion it would appear overnightStudies come and goBased on what data?No amount of printing ie trillions and trillions and trillions is going to solve the problem if local and state govts keep this lockdown going. The number of deaths due to the virus will pale in comparison to the death from the upcoming depression. People had better wake up.
Great Depression Had Little Effect on Death Rates
academics must do studies or face having to find a real job
if it suites their agenda libs can whip up a new study contradicting their old study in no time at all
So find one that says the Great Depression killed "hundreds of thousands". We'll wait.
No amount of printing ie trillions and trillions and trillions is going to solve the problem if local and state govts keep this lockdown going. The number of deaths due to the virus will pale in comparison to the death from the upcoming depression. People had better wake up.
They're not going to be able to keep this lockdown going for very much longer, no matter how much idle speculation the bureaucrats and eggheads indulge in. People simply will not tolerate that, and any politician who thinks it's possible to sustain a lockdown against the will of the people is just delusional.
I pray that you're right. This can not continue or the US is done.
No, its just an observation of how libs operateIf libs needed such a conclusion it would appear overnightStudies come and goBased on what data?No amount of printing ie trillions and trillions and trillions is going to solve the problem if local and state govts keep this lockdown going. The number of deaths due to the virus will pale in comparison to the death from the upcoming depression. People had better wake up.
Great Depression Had Little Effect on Death Rates
academics must do studies or face having to find a real job
if it suites their agenda libs can whip up a new study contradicting their old study in no time at all
So find one that says the Great Depression killed "hundreds of thousands". We'll wait.
That's not the lamest dodge ever, but it's a condtenda...
Kiddo, I'm using the RWNJ definition of socialism, in which all forms of government assistance except that which goes to billionaires and multi billion dollar corporations is decried as socialist.GOP cries "socialism save us!"GOP senator's coronavirus plan: Get federal government to cover 80 percent of wages.
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) wants the United States to follow Europe’s lead. That’s not something conservatives like him normally say, but he believes desperate times call for desperate measures.
The rising star on the right proposes that the federal government replicate what’s been working in the United Kingdom to keep layoffs limited and immediately begin covering 80 percent of worker wages at all private businesses, up to the national median wage, until the emergency caused by the novel coronavirus is over. He also advocates paying financial bonuses for businesses to rehire workers laid off over the past month.
....................................................................................................................................................
The magnitude of the impact to the economy from fighting the virus is truly unprecedented. The rationale for throwing the kitchen sink at preventing what would be a depression without government intervention is ultimately it is cheaper to prevent one than try to recover from one.
What I find telling is how quickly Repubs (who make claims to fiscal responsibility when a Dem is in the WH) propose what can fairly be described as socialist remedies under Repub admins. No amount of government debt is too much for a Repub when his party is at risk of being held accountable for a massive economic downturn.
When Shrub was prez, facing the start of a deep recession, Dems cooperated in passing TARP. When Obama took office and the Bush recession was in full swing, no Repub supported the stimulus package. Using the pretense it was too costly. How times have changed.
However ill-advised his suggestion is, it's still not socialism. If you're going to enthusiastically support and advocate for something, it might be a good idea to find out what it actually is first.
No, its just an observation of how libs operateIf libs needed such a conclusion it would appear overnightStudies come and goBased on what data?No amount of printing ie trillions and trillions and trillions is going to solve the problem if local and state govts keep this lockdown going. The number of deaths due to the virus will pale in comparison to the death from the upcoming depression. People had better wake up.
Great Depression Had Little Effect on Death Rates
academics must do studies or face having to find a real job
if it suites their agenda libs can whip up a new study contradicting their old study in no time at all
So find one that says the Great Depression killed "hundreds of thousands". We'll wait.
That's not the lamest dodge ever, but it's a condtenda...
You guys sure love nazism.What I find telling is how quickly Repubs (who make claims to fiscal responsibility when a Dem is in the WH) propose what can fairly be described as socialist remedies under Repub admins. No amount of government debt is too much for a Repub when his party is at risk of being held accountable for a massive economic downturn.
Republicans have always been cozy with this stuff; they just lie to their voters about it.
Libs are full of studiesNo, its just an observation of how libs operateIf libs needed such a conclusion it would appear overnightStudies come and goBased on what data?No amount of printing ie trillions and trillions and trillions is going to solve the problem if local and state govts keep this lockdown going. The number of deaths due to the virus will pale in comparison to the death from the upcoming depression. People had better wake up.
Great Depression Had Little Effect on Death Rates
academics must do studies or face having to find a real job
if it suites their agenda libs can whip up a new study contradicting their old study in no time at all
So find one that says the Great Depression killed "hundreds of thousands". We'll wait.
That's not the lamest dodge ever, but it's a condtenda...
Way to double down on your lame dodge. Going for having the lamest dodge ever? You should just ignore the question like LordBrownTrout did.
Face it, you can't come up with data that will support their claim since "hundreds of thousands" did not die as a result of the Great Depression. Same thing with the Great Recession. "Hundreds of thousands" did not die because of economic downturn. Know what else? The economy recovered. People who die as a result of this virus don't recover.
Libs are full of studiesNo, its just an observation of how libs operateIf libs needed such a conclusion it would appear overnightStudies come and goBased on what data?No amount of printing ie trillions and trillions and trillions is going to solve the problem if local and state govts keep this lockdown going. The number of deaths due to the virus will pale in comparison to the death from the upcoming depression. People had better wake up.
Great Depression Had Little Effect on Death Rates
academics must do studies or face having to find a real job
if it suites their agenda libs can whip up a new study contradicting their old study in no time at all
So find one that says the Great Depression killed "hundreds of thousands". We'll wait.
That's not the lamest dodge ever, but it's a condtenda...
Way to double down on your lame dodge. Going for having the lamest dodge ever? You should just ignore the question like LordBrownTrout did.
Face it, you can't come up with data that will support their claim since "hundreds of thousands" did not die as a result of the Great Depression. Same thing with the Great Recession. "Hundreds of thousands" did not die because of economic downturn. Know what else? The economy recovered. People who die as a result of this virus don't recover.
they have them running out of every orifice, particularly their asshole
Sez youYes, we do...but that's because we like things to be fact based. You, as a Trump sychophant, obviously, do not.
In socialism everything is expensive, valuable (not the same as quality) and rare. Such things like food.Republicans have always been cozy with this stuff; they just lie to their voters about it.
No kidding.
Socialism sure is expensive isn’t it?
Lots of things are expensive. That doesn't mean they aren't valuable and necessary
