Stupid Question

[Mac1958]

"Gosh, why wasn't Trump Hitler or a Nazi the first time?"

I keep seeing this ridiculous question.

First, Trump is not Hitler. There are many disturbing parallels between now and 1930's Germany, but Trump is not Hitler. Again: Trump is not Hitler. The fact that the people nearest him are fascists and that he is essentially a de facto fascist does not make him Hitler. A fascist is not necessarily a Nazi.

To answer the question:

1. He hired staffers who were not willing to put Trump over the office. He wants pure, blind loyalty, and their loyalty was to the Constitution. That definitely will not be the case this time. He will specifically and aggressively surround himself with sycophants exclusively.

2. He did not have a specific set of plans going into his presidency. He sure will this time around. They'll hit the ground hard on Day One, and here comes Project 2025 and Theocracy Lite™. We will see an early and historic flurry of activity from the White House.

3. Perhaps most importantly, he has a breathtakingly compliant Supreme Court that has paved the way for him by making him immune. He has no legal or ethical restrictions this time around. He will be the first American President with nothing holding him back.

It's a stupid, insulting, boring, ridiculous question, but now you have your answers. You're welcome.

 

[Papageorgio]

It won’t happen, this is just fear mongering from the left, it did not play well to independents that decided the election. The middle, who really elect the President didn’t believe the far left stupidity, Harris should have had her own vision for America and should have defined what she would do differently than Biden if elected. She agreed with every move Biden made and did not have plan.

 

[SweetSue92]

"Gosh, why wasn't Trump Hitler or a Nazi the first time?"

I keep seeing this ridiculous question.

First, Trump is not Hitler. There are many disturbing parallels between now and 1930's Germany, but Trump is not Hitler. Again: Trump is not Hitler. The fact that the people nearest him are fascists and that he is essentially a de facto fascist does not make him Hitler. A fascist is not necessarily a Nazi.

To answer the question:

1. He hired staffers who were not willing to put Trump over the office. He wants pure, blind loyalty, and their loyalty was to the Constitution. That definitely will not be the case this time. He will specifically and aggressively surround himself with sycophants exclusively.

2. He did not have a specific set of plans going into his presidency. He sure will this time around. They'll hit the ground hard on Day One, and here comes Project 2025 and Theocracy Lite™. We will see an early and historic flurry of activity from the White House.

3. Perhaps most importantly, he has a breathtakingly compliant Supreme Court that has paved the way for him by making him immune. He has no legal or ethical restrictions this time around. He will be the first American President with nothing holding him back.

It's a stupid, insulting, boring, ridiculous question, but now you have your answers. You're welcome.

Even MY active imagination failed me. I did not imagine the cope would be this theatrically hilarious.

 

[MarcATL]

Can anyone post a video of a prominent Democrat calling Trump Hitler?

 

[Papageorgio]

Can anyone post a video of a prominent Democrat calling Trump Hitler?

They are to clever to do that but they did push the narrative.

DNC projects message tying Trump to Hitler on Madison Square Garden during rally

Sunday marks the first time the DNC is projecting counterprogramming onto a building while Trump will be inside it, but it's far from the first time Democrats have deployed the technique.

www.cbsnews.com

Then you have Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton likens Trump to Hitler and warns he would end democracy

Then Joy Behar who is a left wing mouth piece on a far left national talk show. Joy Behar compares Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler: 'Fascist pig'

Harris on Trump. 'Admires dictators': Harris continues comparing Trump to Hitler during battleground state town hall

Joe Biden. https://www.politico.com/news/2023/12/19/biden-trump-hitler-00132367

Jewish Democrats. A new ad from Jewish Democrats compares Trump to Hitler

 

[Votto]

"Gosh, why wasn't Trump Hitler or a Nazi the first time?"

I keep seeing this ridiculous question.

First, Trump is not Hitler. There are many disturbing parallels between now and 1930's Germany, but Trump is not Hitler. Again: Trump is not Hitler. The fact that the people nearest him are fascists and that he is essentially a de facto fascist does not make him Hitler. A fascist is not necessarily a Nazi.

To answer the question:

1. He hired staffers who were not willing to put Trump over the office. He wants pure, blind loyalty, and their loyalty was to the Constitution. That definitely will not be the case this time. He will specifically and aggressively surround himself with sycophants exclusively.

2. He did not have a specific set of plans going into his presidency. He sure will this time around. They'll hit the ground hard on Day One, and here comes Project 2025 and Theocracy Lite™. We will see an early and historic flurry of activity from the White House.

3. Perhaps most importantly, he has a breathtakingly compliant Supreme Court that has paved the way for him by making him immune. He has no legal or ethical restrictions this time around. He will be the first American President with nothing holding him back.

It's a stupid, insulting, boring, ridiculous question, but now you have your answers. You're welcome.

 

[berg80]

"Gosh, why wasn't Trump Hitler or a Nazi the first time?"

I keep seeing this ridiculous question.

First, Trump is not Hitler. There are many disturbing parallels between now and 1930's Germany, but Trump is not Hitler. Again: Trump is not Hitler. The fact that the people nearest him are fascists and that he is essentially a de facto fascist does not make him Hitler. A fascist is not necessarily a Nazi.

To answer the question:

1. He hired staffers who were not willing to put Trump over the office. He wants pure, blind loyalty, and their loyalty was to the Constitution. That definitely will not be the case this time. He will specifically and aggressively surround himself with sycophants exclusively.

2. He did not have a specific set of plans going into his presidency. He sure will this time around. They'll hit the ground hard on Day One, and here comes Project 2025 and Theocracy Lite™. We will see an early and historic flurry of activity from the White House.

3. Perhaps most importantly, he has a breathtakingly compliant Supreme Court that has paved the way for him by making him immune. He has no legal or ethical restrictions this time around. He will be the first American President with nothing holding him back.

It's a stupid, insulting, boring, ridiculous question, but now you have your answers. You're welcome.

If we have learned anything about his first term it is the degree to which he was thwarted from acting on his more idiotic and autocratic impulses because of the number of what is now referred to as "establishment" Repubs who staffed his admin.

Those are the folks we kept hearing from during the campaign, warning about trump's abject unfitness to be prez again. The ones trumples dismissed because they can't bear to deal with the truth about Dear Leader.

 

[Votto]

"Gosh, why wasn't Trump Hitler or a Nazi the first time?"

I keep seeing this ridiculous question.

First, Trump is not Hitler. There are many disturbing parallels between now and 1930's Germany, but Trump is not Hitler. Again: Trump is not Hitler. The fact that the people nearest him are fascists and that he is essentially a de facto fascist does not make him Hitler. A fascist is not necessarily a Nazi.

To answer the question:

1. He hired staffers who were not willing to put Trump over the office. He wants pure, blind loyalty, and their loyalty was to the Constitution. That definitely will not be the case this time. He will specifically and aggressively surround himself with sycophants exclusively.

2. He did not have a specific set of plans going into his presidency. He sure will this time around. They'll hit the ground hard on Day One, and here comes Project 2025 and Theocracy Lite™. We will see an early and historic flurry of activity from the White House.

3. Perhaps most importantly, he has a breathtakingly compliant Supreme Court that has paved the way for him by making him immune. He has no legal or ethical restrictions this time around. He will be the first American President with nothing holding him back.

It's a stupid, insulting, boring, ridiculous question, but now you have your answers. You're welcome.

Again, anyone who thinks that Trump, who was unable to get a GOP controlled Congress to repeal and replace Obamacare and secure the border the first two years like they all promised to do and ran on, can take over the government Hitler style is a complete buffoon.

I don't even think he can do it this time as well, but at least he can enact EO's to help stop the flow of immigrants like he did last time.

Really, anything is better than the last 4 years.

I predict Trump will have even more knives in his back this go round. The entire Federal government is poised to crush him

 

[there4eyeM]

Hyperbole aside, there is almost no similarity between today and the Hitler period. Trump is unpredictable because even he doesn't know what he'll do or say tomorrow. Things will depend on much more than even he has control of. There is no particular reason to think things will be worse with him in place than if the other candidate had "won". What would help the most would be a return to reasoned discussion and debate among citizens. Unity will come up from the people, not down from the top.

 

[Mac1958]

If we have learned anything about his first term it is the degree to which he was thwarted from acting on his more idiotic and autocratic impulses because of the number of what is now referred to as "establishment" Repubs who staffed his admin.

Those are the folks we kept hearing from during the campaign, warning about trump's abject unfitness to be prez again. The ones trumples dismissed because they can't bear to deal with the truth about Dear Leader.

Yeah. None of those evil commies this time around.

 

[JoeB131]

Gosh, why wasn't Trump Hitler or a Nazi the first time?"

I keep seeing this ridiculous question.

First, Trump is not Hitler. There are many disturbing parallels between now and 1930's Germany, but Trump is not Hitler. Again: Trump is not Hitler. The fact that the people nearest him are fascists and that he is essentially a de facto fascist does not make him Hitler. A fascist is not necessarily a Nazi.

To answer the question:

Actually, I kind of agree with your points, so I won't debate them, Vichy Mac.

But Trump is probably as close to Hitler as America is going to get.

What pushes Trump over the line from "Fascist" to "Nazi" is that Nazism has a racist/nationalist element to it that Trump almost certainly reflects.

But a lot of dumb people felt electing a woman would emasculate them this time, so here we are, facing the biggest case of buyer's remorse ever.

 

[MarcATL]

They are to clever to do that but they did push the narrative.

DNC projects message tying Trump to Hitler on Madison Square Garden during rally

Sunday marks the first time the DNC is projecting counterprogramming onto a building while Trump will be inside it, but it's far from the first time Democrats have deployed the technique.

www.cbsnews.com

Then you have Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton likens Trump to Hitler and warns he would end democracy

Then Joy Behar who is a left wing mouth piece on a far left national talk show. Joy Behar compares Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler: 'Fascist pig'

Harris on Trump. 'Admires dictators': Harris continues comparing Trump to Hitler during battleground state town hall

Joe Biden. https://www.politico.com/news/2023/12/19/biden-trump-hitler-00132367

Jewish Democrats. A new ad from Jewish Democrats compares Trump to Hitler

What should people do when a politician uses Hitler's rhetoric and/or Nazi rhetoric, ignore it?

Haven't Republicans been calling Democrats Marxists for decades?

Democrats ought to shut up and take it and Republicans get to cry, bitch and moan about every little thing?

What are we talking about here?

 

[berg80]

Yeah. None of those evil commies this time around.

And that can be said about government employees beyond his immediate staff when he implements loyalty tests for civil servants laid out in Project 2025. The thing he knows nothing about.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Can anyone post a video of a prominent Democrat calling Trump Hitler?

Your failed candidate Kamala Harris said Trump was Hitler FROM THE FREAKING WHITEHOUSE a week ago!!!!!!!!
Not sure if you suffer from cognitive dissonance, or you're just full of shit gaslighting.
Either way, you're a freaking idiot.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

"Gosh, why wasn't Trump Hitler or a Nazi the first time?"

I keep seeing this ridiculous question.

First, Trump is not Hitler. There are many disturbing parallels between now and 1930's Germany, but Trump is not Hitler. Again: Trump is not Hitler. The fact that the people nearest him are fascists and that he is essentially a de facto fascist does not make him Hitler. A fascist is not necessarily a Nazi.

To answer the question:

1. He hired staffers who were not willing to put Trump over the office. He wants pure, blind loyalty, and their loyalty was to the Constitution. That definitely will not be the case this time. He will specifically and aggressively surround himself with sycophants exclusively.

2. He did not have a specific set of plans going into his presidency. He sure will this time around. They'll hit the ground hard on Day One, and here comes Project 2025 and Theocracy Lite™. We will see an early and historic flurry of activity from the White House.

3. Perhaps most importantly, he has a breathtakingly compliant Supreme Court that has paved the way for him by making him immune. He has no legal or ethical restrictions this time around. He will be the first American President with nothing holding him back.

It's a stupid, insulting, boring, ridiculous question, but now you have your answers. You're welcome.

No such thing as a stupid question. There is such a thing as a stupid person asking a question. That’s you. Get over your TDS

 

[sparky]

What are we talking about here?

It's the left that has in recent times assumed constitutional killing fascist status

They've manipulated and lied to their constituency to the point of being beyond reproach

Until yesterday, now these marxists are whining because they're about to be exposed as what they are, the same folks that wanted Trump dead

Welcome to the party of truth>>>



~S~

 

[MarcATL]

It's the left that has in recent times assumed constitutional killing fascist status

They've manipulated and lied to their constituency to the point of being beyond reproach

Until yesterday, now these marxists are whining because they're about to be exposed as what they are, the same folks that wanted Trump dead

Welcome to the party of truth>>>



~S~

Truth is the last thing the Republican party represents.

 

[Votto]

What should people do when a politician uses Hitler's rhetoric and/or Nazi rhetoric, ignore it?

Haven't Republicans been calling Democrats Marxists for decades?

Democrats ought to shut up and take it and Republicans get to cry, bitch and moan about every little thing?

What are we talking about here?

BLM proudly proclaims themselves Marxists idiot, and then you get the trail of democrat leadership who publicly say they are behind them

My question is, why is it cool to be a Marxist when it should be just as condemning to be called a Nazi? In fact, Marxists murdered hundreds of millions more than Nazis last century, not to mention Karl Marx was a horrible racist against blacks and Jews.

 

[sparky]

Truth is the last thing the Republican party represents.

Maybe, but we now get to watch the Reps hold the Dems feet to the fire for it now Marc

~S~

 

[Votto]

"Gosh, why wasn't Trump Hitler or a Nazi the first time?"

I keep seeing this ridiculous question.

First, Trump is not Hitler. There are many disturbing parallels between now and 1930's Germany, but Trump is not Hitler. Again: Trump is not Hitler. The fact that the people nearest him are fascists and that he is essentially a de facto fascist does not make him Hitler. A fascist is not necessarily a Nazi.

To answer the question:

1. He hired staffers who were not willing to put Trump over the office. He wants pure, blind loyalty, and their loyalty was to the Constitution. That definitely will not be the case this time. He will specifically and aggressively surround himself with sycophants exclusively.

2. He did not have a specific set of plans going into his presidency. He sure will this time around. They'll hit the ground hard on Day One, and here comes Project 2025 and Theocracy Lite™. We will see an early and historic flurry of activity from the White House.

3. Perhaps most importantly, he has a breathtakingly compliant Supreme Court that has paved the way for him by making him immune. He has no legal or ethical restrictions this time around. He will be the first American President with nothing holding him back.

It's a stupid, insulting, boring, ridiculous question, but now you have your answers. You're welcome.

I just love the threads that will now start, "I know Trump is not really Hitler, even though he kind of is"

Hilarious.