Stupid Question

[Mac1958]

In the OP I said, clearly, three (3) times, "Trump is not Hitler". I could not have made it more clear. Even for Trumpsters.

The response? "THEY SAY TRUMP IS HITLER, BOO HOO"

And this is why I've given up trying with them here.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Republicans have been calling Democrats Marxists long before Black Lives Matter existed.

Are you capable of being honest?

That's because you assholes are subverted demoralized Marxists.
Soviet Russia spent the 20th century infiltrating our edu, media, and governance with Marxist Leninist bullshit before that ideology ultimately FAILED in Russia.
YOU are the LEFT-over residue from that effort.
FACT, not hyperbole.
Trump has been elected to finally get this retarded ideology OUT of the United States of America once and for ALL.

"What you're seeing and what you're reading is not what's happening." ―The Liar-in-Chief, 2018

“The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” Orwell

IRONY

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

In the OP I said, clearly, more than once, "Trump is not Hitler". I could not have made it more clear. Even for Trumpsters.

The response? "THEY SAY TRUMP IS HITLER, BOO HOO"

And this is why I've given up trying with them here.

Yeah. Fuck these garbage people.

 

[DStar777]

"Gosh, why wasn't Trump Hitler or a Nazi the first time?"

I keep seeing this ridiculous question.

Ok here's the deal:
You have no evidence Trump will be a Nazi/fascist
You have no evidence Trump will shred the Constitution
You have no evidence Trump will execute his enemies
What you have is load of BS propaganda to scare us with

 

[Mac1958]

You have no evidence Trump will be a Nazi/fascist
You have no evidence Trump will shred the Constitution
You have no evidence Trump will execute his enemies

Yes, that's all correct.

You can't have evidence of something that hasn't happened yet.

Good for you, slugger.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Ok here's the deal:
You have no evidence Trump will be a Nazi/fascist
You have no evidence Trump will shred the Constitution
You have no evidence Trump will execute his enemies
What you have is load of BS propaganda to scare us with

Magaturds proved evidence is not required. Sucks to be you.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

"Gosh, why wasn't Trump Hitler or a Nazi the first time?"

I keep seeing this ridiculous question.

First, Trump is not Hitler. There are many disturbing parallels between now and 1930's Germany, but Trump is not Hitler. Again: Trump is not Hitler. The fact that the people nearest him are fascists and that he is essentially a de facto fascist does not make him Hitler. A fascist is not necessarily a Nazi.

To answer the question:

1. He hired staffers who were not willing to put Trump over the office. He wants pure, blind loyalty, and their loyalty was to the Constitution. That definitely will not be the case this time. He will specifically and aggressively surround himself with sycophants exclusively.

2. He did not have a specific set of plans going into his presidency. He sure will this time around. They'll hit the ground hard on Day One, and here comes Project 2025 and Theocracy Lite™. We will see an early and historic flurry of activity from the White House.

3. Perhaps most importantly, he has a breathtakingly compliant Supreme Court that has paved the way for him by making him immune. He has no legal or ethical restrictions this time around. He will be the first American President with nothing holding him back.

It's a stupid, insulting, boring, ridiculous question, but now you have your answers. You're welcome.

No he isn't Hitler. Not that devious..or smart enough. It's the people he surrounds himself with. They're the ones that spout the fascist rhetoric in his ear for him to regurgitate.
Those are the people that are the true believers.

 

[Billiejeens]

No he isn't Hitler. Not that devious..or smart enough. It's the people he surrounds himself with. They're the ones that spout the fascist rhetoric in his ear for him to regurgitate.
Those are the people that are the true believers.

Poor jackie
Did you have a good cry?

 

[Mac1958]

No he isn't Hitler. Not that devious..or smart enough. It's the people he surrounds himself with. They're the ones that spout the fascist rhetoric in his ear for him to regurgitate.
Those are the people that are the true believers.

Exactly. He's going with the path of least resistance, wherever he can find respect and validation.

If he could have found it with the Dems, he'd be pushing their agenda.

But the talk radio crowd was tailor made for him.

 

[DStar777]

Yes, that's all correct.

You can't have evidence of something that hasn't happened yet.

Good for you, slugger.

.. you mean something that will never happen. Just like Harris wasn't going to end civilization as we know it.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Exactly. He's going with the path of least resistance, wherever he can find respect and validation.

If he could have found it with the Dems, he'd be pushing their agenda.

But the talk radio crowd was tailor made for him.

It's the last person to whisper in his ear that gets the attention. That's about how far his brain functions.

 

[MarcATL]

Maybe, but we now get to watch the Reps hold the Dems feet to the fire for it now Marc

~S~

Hold their feet to the fire for what exactly?

 

[rightwinger]

Deportations should occur, don't get me wrong, but they should start with criminals. Gangs like MS 13 should go bye, bye, and they are are not hard to spot because of their tattoos.

I have no problem with zero tolerance for migrants

If you break the law, you are deported

 

[MarcATL]

Lets face it…

There is nothing to stop Trump from doing what he wants

Firstly, he has no internal check on what is right or wrong
There will be no staff telling him he shouldn’t do this
Trump doesn’t have to worry about being re-elected
The Republican Congress will rubber stamp anything he wants and impeachment is off the table. Senate Filibuster will be abolished
The Supreme Court says he can break any law as long as he can claim an official act

Yep, all we can do is point out the lack of principles that's going to be happening and report everything that's going on as accurately as possible, in real time and for posterity.

Same exact thing I did under the Bush II Regime.

Republicans are going to royally eff things up.

It's what they do best.

Watch....

 

[rightwinger]

Hopefully, the indoctrinated posters on this board do not represent the beliefs of rank and file Repubs.

Rank and file Republicans have lost to MAGA
They are calling the shots

 

[BlackSand]

"Gosh, why wasn't Trump Hitler or a Nazi the first time?"

I keep seeing this ridiculous question.

First, Trump is not Hitler. There are many disturbing parallels between now and 1930's Germany, but Trump is not Hitler. Again: Trump is not Hitler. The fact that the people nearest him are fascists and that he is essentially a de facto fascist does not make him Hitler. A fascist is not necessarily a Nazi.

To answer the question:

1. He hired staffers who were not willing to put Trump over the office. He wants pure, blind loyalty, and their loyalty was to the Constitution. That definitely will not be the case this time. He will specifically and aggressively surround himself with sycophants exclusively.

2. He did not have a specific set of plans going into his presidency. He sure will this time around. They'll hit the ground hard on Day One, and here comes Project 2025 and Theocracy Lite™. We will see an early and historic flurry of activity from the White House.

3. Perhaps most importantly, he has a breathtakingly compliant Supreme Court that has paved the way for him by making him immune. He has no legal or ethical restrictions this time around. He will be the first American President with nothing holding him back.

It's a stupid, insulting, boring, ridiculous question, but now you have your answers. You're welcome.

.

Hey MacDaddy ... You should probably stop smoking crack ...
The ship carrying all that utter nonsense has already sailed.

Have A Lovely Day ... You Ignorant Twat ...

.​

 

[MarcATL]

I have met a great number of people who proudly say they are a communist or Marxist

I have never met one that proudly proclaimed they are a Nazi or fascist.

In fact, Kamala's own father was a Marxist professor because college campuses are crawling with them, and she is proud of him.

Idiot.

Yeah, the old "I know a guy" trope.

Go blow it out your ass hack.

 

[eagle1462010]

"Gosh, why wasn't Trump Hitler or a Nazi the first time?"

I keep seeing this ridiculous question.

First, Trump is not Hitler. There are many disturbing parallels between now and 1930's Germany, but Trump is not Hitler. Again: Trump is not Hitler. The fact that the people nearest him are fascists and that he is essentially a de facto fascist does not make him Hitler. A fascist is not necessarily a Nazi.

To answer the question:

1. He hired staffers who were not willing to put Trump over the office. He wants pure, blind loyalty, and their loyalty was to the Constitution. That definitely will not be the case this time. He will specifically and aggressively surround himself with sycophants exclusively.

2. He did not have a specific set of plans going into his presidency. He sure will this time around. They'll hit the ground hard on Day One, and here comes Project 2025 and Theocracy Lite™. We will see an early and historic flurry of activity from the White House.

3. Perhaps most importantly, he has a breathtakingly compliant Supreme Court that has paved the way for him by making him immune. He has no legal or ethical restrictions this time around. He will be the first American President with nothing holding him back.

It's a stupid, insulting, boring, ridiculous question, but now you have your answers. You're welcome.

TDS is terminal with this Clown.

 

[Natural Citizen]

What would help the most would be a return to reasoned discussion and debate among citizens.

There's a fundamental truth to this. So agree about that.

Society must first resolve itself and that will/should theoretically reflect on the laws. But you're still left with a congressional party-of-one in many regards, whereas the electorate's will isn't necessarily what they're representing, but rather special interests primarily, both foreign and domestic, which has historically been, and likely will continue to be, contrary to the truly meaningful interests of the actual people.

Unity will come up from the people, not down from the top.

So far as ''unity'' goes, I don't like the way it's packaged and sold, so I prefer as much division as possible.

This line of division is the difference between liberty and serfdom in scope.

Now if the majority of Americans could ''unify'' in the cause of liberty, I might give it credence, but as it is the so-called ''moderate'' vote( the unity demograph) is the very symbol of the way ''unity'' is packaged and sold today. And historically speaking, it's been the single-greatest threat to the cause of liberty in America today because the so-called ''moderate'' vote tends to always be just okay with most of the bad anti-liberty legislation coming out of both so-called sides of the party-of-one in Washington combined Again, historically speaking...

 

[rightwinger]

Republicans are going to royally eff things up.

It's what they do best.

In their glee over new found power, that is what Republicans forget.
They will be accountable for their actions and will eventually face an election.

With MAGA calling the shots and traditional Republicans being ignored….there is going to be some crazy shit going down