Study: Physically Weak Men More Likely To Be Socialists

[Weatherman2020]

Shocking, I know.

An academic study from researchers at Brunel University London assessed 171 men, looking at their height, weight, overall physical strength and bicep circumference, along with their views on redistribution of wealth and income inequality. The study, published in the Evolution and Human Behavior journal, found that weaker men were more likely to favor socialist policies than stronger men.

Study: Physically Weak Men More Likely To Be Socialists

 

[bluzman61]

Shocking, I know.

An academic study from researchers at Brunel University London assessed 171 men, looking at their height, weight, overall physical strength and bicep circumference, along with their views on redistribution of wealth and income inequality. The study, published in the Evolution and Human Behavior journal, found that weaker men were more likely to favor socialist policies than stronger men.

Study: Physically Weak Men More Likely To Be Socialists

View attachment 292676

This makes a LOT of sense. Most of the male liberals I know are weak, soy-boy cucks.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Shocking, I know.

An academic study from researchers at Brunel University London assessed 171 men, looking at their height, weight, overall physical strength and bicep circumference, along with their views on redistribution of wealth and income inequality. The study, published in the Evolution and Human Behavior journal, found that weaker men were more likely to favor socialist policies than stronger men.

Study: Physically Weak Men More Likely To Be Socialists

View attachment 292676

That seems rather obvious. “From each according to his ability; to each according to his need.” would very obviously appeal much more to someone who perceives his own ability to be relatively low, compared to his perceived needs; someone who expects his needs to be met, disproportionately by the labor of others. Those of us who hope to carry our own weight, to produce enough value through our work to pay for our own needs, are much less likely to find the idea appealing of having to have the fruits of our own labor diminished in order to support those who won't carry their own weight.

 

[The Irish Ram]

Welp, that explains Didleysquat...

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Welp, that explains Didleysquat...

Yes, it certainly does.

 

[bluzman61]

It will be interesting to see if any of the physically weak socialist lunatic liberal males on here reply to THIS one! My guess would be NO, at least not in an intelligent or coherent manner. We'll see...........

 

[initforme]

The strongest are third party

 

[Weatherman2020]

The strongest are third party

Run Bernie, Run!

 

[Bleipriester]

It will be interesting to see if any of the physically weak socialist lunatic liberal males on here reply to THIS one! My guess would be NO, at least not in an intelligent or coherent manner. We'll see...........

It would mean that bigger monkeys are capitalist and smarter people are socialist.

 

[bluzman61]

It will be interesting to see if any of the physically weak socialist lunatic liberal males on here reply to THIS one! My guess would be NO, at least not in an intelligent or coherent manner. We'll see...........

It would mean that bigger monkeys are capitalist and smarter people are socialist.

Like I pointed out, ANY responses from these cucks would lack intelligence and coherency. You're welcome.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

D 1 and pro basketball and football contradicts that study, considering most American blacks vote dem and are superior in those strength-dominated sports.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

It will be interesting to see if any of the physically weak socialist lunatic liberal males on here reply to THIS one! My guess would be NO, at least not in an intelligent or coherent manner. We'll see...........

Let's page some of them, and see…

• TheProgressivePatriot
• Tommy Tainant
• JoeB131
• Fort Fun Indiana
• Faun
• rightwinger
• Billy000
• Timmy
• g5000
• Bo Didleysquat

Who am I missing? Quite a few, I'm sure.

 

[Nostra]

D 1 and pro basketball and football contradicts that study, considering most American blacks vote dem and are superior in those strength-dominated sports.

Google Image Result for https://s3media.247sports.com/Uploads/Assets/852/747/8747852.jpg

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Thats a no brainer.....
Just look at Texas.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

D 1 and pro basketball and football contradicts that study, considering most American blacks vote dem and are superior in those strength-dominated sports.

Google Image Result for https://s3media.247sports.com/Uploads/Assets/852/747/8747852.jpg

Now you’ve employed a democrat tactic of using the anecdotal as the norm.

 

[bodecea]

Shocking, I know.

An academic study from researchers at Brunel University London assessed 171 men, looking at their height, weight, overall physical strength and bicep circumference, along with their views on redistribution of wealth and income inequality. The study, published in the Evolution and Human Behavior journal, found that weaker men were more likely to favor socialist policies than stronger men.

Study: Physically Weak Men More Likely To Be Socialists

View attachment 292676

Better than being a muscle-bound bully with no brains.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

It would mean that bigger monkeys are capitalist and smarter people are socialist.

Ultimately, I think it's about ability. The study focused on physical ability, but surely, intellectual ability, or even merely a decent work ethic, is just as relevant.

Whether physical, intellectual, or ethically, I think it very obviously stands to reason that those of low ability,or those who perceive their ability to be low, will be most likely to favor a system in which they can ride on the backs of those with greater ability; while those of us with greater ability will much prefer a system that does not burden us with carrying the low-ability parasites' load along with our own.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Better than being a muscle-bound bully with no brains.

Says the weak bully with no muscle nor brains; the perfect example of one who'd prefer socialism, having little willingness or ability to carry his own fair share.

 

[skews13]

Shocking, I know.

An academic study from researchers at Brunel University London assessed 171 men, looking at their height, weight, overall physical strength and bicep circumference, along with their views on redistribution of wealth and income inequality. The study, published in the Evolution and Human Behavior journal, found that weaker men were more likely to favor socialist policies than stronger men.

Study: Physically Weak Men More Likely To Be Socialists

View attachment 292676

Yes, shocking.

Yes, Junior, it’s the usual B.S. — i.e., no one outside of the Republican National Committee wants to buy your book, and no one who can actually afford a plane ticket and/or a $9 bag of trail mix would be caught dead holding it.

So, yeah, whine some more, Little Lord Fauntleroy

Donald Trump Jr. is triggered by lack of bookstore support for 'Triggered'

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Well duh.