What type of person prefers a fascist government?

Approved by the FDA but for the first time EVER a drug was put on the marketplace with the manufacturer being given total protection from law suits if it turned out to be harmful! It doesn't take a genius to figure out why Big Pharma wanted that protection! The "vaccines" were rushed into production and nobody had a clue what the long term results would be from taking the shots!
I guess we are supposed to forget that people were dying by the droves, something like 1000 people per day, to create a false victimhood narrative so the right wing can feel oppressed by the government.
 
You don't get it...do you, Elmer! Those "characteristics" are more indicative of the Obama and Biden Administrations then the Trump Administration!

The hell it is. Trump is "governing" straight from the autocrat handbook.
 
It is cleat that interference with criminals in pursuit of their crimes is authoritarian. Criminals out voting victims is democracy.
 
Those crazy school districts. They teach children the earth is round, like a ball. Everyone knows the earth is flat. I am with you.

Those crazy school districts. They teach children the earth is round, like a ball. Everyone knows the earth is flat. I am with you.
Yea, the teach how and why George wants to become Melissa or Critical Race Theory over teaching kids to think critically. As for the student that believes the earth is flat, maybe it is racist to force the pronoun kid to learn that the earth is in fact round.
 
Yes, that would be the Republican party. You guys have cheered for years when police were killing unarmed blacks, and your party has dehumanized anyone not white or straight. You guys have been the ones threatening civil war, and it was the right who has done the most damage. You're in here repeating lies based on extreme rightwing propaganda, not the facts.
You guys? When did I become republican? Last I checked, I hated them too. And everything I said is a hundred percent fact. You can call it a lie all you want, but that doesn't make it true.

And my advice to you, quit making claims about people that you don't know because you keep getting it wrong. You want to know where someone stands, you ask them. But that still probably requires to much honesty and integrity from you with that too.
 
You guys? When did I become republican? Last I checked, I hated them too. And everything I said is a hundred percent fact. You can call it a lie all you want, but that doesn't make it true.

And my advice to you, quit making claims about people that you don't know because you keep getting it wrong. You want to know where someone stands, you ask them. But that still probably requires to much honesty and integrity from you with that too.
My advice to you is don't sound ike a MAGA if you don't want to be accused of being one. You didn't say anything factual. The facts show that it is the right that has committed the most violence. The facts show that during the Floyd protests, much of the damage was caused by right-wing counterprotesters. The facts show that it has been the right that has done the dehumanizing of blacks, Hispanics, Native Americans, Asians, and LGBTQ citizens. So no, you did not post facts. Honesty and integrity? Seems that you don't know what these words really mean, since what you posted was totally untrue.
 
My advice to you is don't sound ike a MAGA if you don't want to be accused of being one. You didn't say anything factual. The facts show that it is the right that has committed the most violence. The facts show that during the Floyd protests, much of the damage was caused by right-wing counterprotesters. The facts show that it has been the right that has done the dehumanizing of blacks, Hispanics, Native Americans, Asians, and LGBTQ citizens. So no, you did not post facts. Honesty and integrity? Seems that you don't know what these words really mean, since what you posted was totally untrue.
Imagine hearing the truth and calling that MAGA. Sad life for you. Charlie Kirk is killed, democrats celebrated. What did they also do after that? Call for more deaths. During the Floyd riots, yes, riots, it was democrats destroying property, attacking people, and setting fires. Try again.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: cnm
Imagine hearing the truth and calling that MAGA. Sad life for you. Charlie Kirk is killed, democrats celebrated. What did they also do after that? Call for more deaths. During the Floyd riots, yes, riots, it was democrats destroying property, attacking people, and setting fires. Try again.
You didn't speak truth morn. Charlie Kirk cheered the deaths of blacks getting killed by police. So f Charlie Kirk. And:

The longstanding crisis of police violence and structural racism in America hit a new flashpoint this year. On 25 May 2020, Minneapolis police officers arrested George Floyd, a 46-year-old Black man, for allegedly using a counterfeit $20 bill. One officer pinned Floyd to the ground and kneeled on his neck for eight minutes and 15 seconds, killing him. Other officers looked on (BBC, 16 July 2020).

Floyd’s death prompted a surge of demonstrations associated with the Black Lives Matter (BLM)<a title="In this report, the acronym “BLM” is used to abbreviate the phrase “Black Lives Matter” when referring to the movement writ large. It is not meant to suggest all associated events are directly affiliated with the national BLM organization." "Demonstrations and Political Violence in America: New Data for Summer 2020"3movement that quickly spread from Minneapolis throughout the country. Between 26 May, the day after Floyd’s death, and 22 August, ACLED records over 7,750 demonstrations linked to the BLM movement across more than 2,440 locations in all 50 states and Washington, DC.

An Overwhelmingly Peaceful Movement

The vast majority of demonstration events associated with the BLM movement are non-violent. In more than 93% of all demonstrations connected to the movement, demonstrators have not engaged in violence or destructive activity. Peaceful protests are reported in over 2,400 distinct locations around the country. Violent demonstrations, meanwhile, have been limited to fewer than 220 locations — under 10% of the areas that experienced peaceful protests. In many urban areas like Portland, Oregon, for example, which has seen sustained unrest since Floyd’s killing, violent demonstrations are largely confined to specific blocks, rather than dispersed throughout the city (CNN, 1 September 2020).

Yet, despite data indicating that demonstrations associated with the BLM movement are overwhelmingly peaceful, one recent poll suggested that 42% of respondents believe “most protesters [associated with the BLM movement] are trying to incite violence or destroy property” (FiveThirtyEight, 5 June 2020). This is in line with the Civiqs tracking poll which finds that “net approval for the Black Lives Matter movement peaked back on June 3 [the week following the killing of George Floyd when riots first began to be reported] and has fallen sharply since” (USA Today, 31 August 2020; Civiqs, 29 August 2020).

Research from the University of Washington indicates that this disparity stems from political orientation and biased media framing (Washington Post, 24 August 2020), such as disproportionate coverage of violent demonstrations (Business Insider, 11 June 2020; Poynter, 25 June 2020). Groups like the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) have documented organized disinformation campaigns aimed at spreading a “deliberate mischaracterization of groups or movements [involved in the protests], such as portraying activists who support Black Lives Matter as violent extremists or claiming that antifa is a terrorist organization coordinated or manipulated by nebulous external forces” (ADL, 2020). These disinformation campaigns may be contributing to the decline in public support for the BLM movement after the initial increase following Floyd’s killing, especially amongst the white population (USA Today, 31 August 2020; Civiqs, 30 August 2020a, 30 August 2020b). This waning support also comes as the Trump administration recently shifted its “law and order” messaging to target local Democratic Party politicians from urban areas, particularly on the campaign trail (NPR, 27 August 2020).

Despite the media focus on looting and vandalism, however, there is little evidence to suggest that demonstrators have engaged in widespread violence. In some cases where demonstrations did turn violent, there are reports of agents provocateurs — or infiltrators — instigating the violence. During a demonstration on 27 May in Minneapolis, for example, a man with an umbrella — dubbed the ‘umbrella man’ by the media and later identified as a member of the Hells Angels linked to the Aryan Cowboys, a white supremacist prison and street gang — was seen smashing store windows (Forbes, 30 May 2020; KSTP, 28 July 2020). It was one of the first reports of destructive activity that day, and it “created an atmosphere of hostility and tension” that helped spark an outbreak of looting following initially peaceful protests, according to police investigators, who believe the man “wanted to sow discord and racial unrest” (New York Times, 28 July 2020). In another example on 29 May in Detroit, a number of non-residents reportedly traveled to the city to engage in violent behavior during a demonstration, leading to multiple arrests (MLive, 2 June 2020).

The Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project, Demonstrations & Political Violence In America: New Data for Summer 2020, Demonstrations and Political Violence in America: New Data for Summer 2020

(This was initially published by the Harvard Radcliffe Institute, October 20, 2020. However, that webpage appears to no longer exist.)

The Black Lives Matter uprisings were remarkably nonviolent. When there was violence, very often police or counterprotesters were reportedly directing it at the protesters.

When the Department of Homeland Security released its Homeland Threat Assessment earlier this month, it emphasized that self-proclaimed white supremacist groups are the most dangerous threat to U.S. security. But the report misleadingly added that there had been “over 100 days of violence and destruction in our cities,” referring to the anti-racism uprisings of this past summer.

In fact, the Black Lives Matter uprisings were remarkably nonviolent. When there was violence, very often police or counterprotesters were reportedly directing it at the protesters.

First, police made arrests in 5% of the protest events, with over 8,500 reported arrests (or possibly more). Police used tear gas or related chemical substances in 2.5% of these events.

Protesters or bystanders were reported injured in 1.6 percent of the protests. In total, at least three Black Lives Matter protesters and one other person were killed while protesting in Omaha, Austin and Kenosha, Wis. One anti-fascist protester killed a far-right group member during a confrontation in Portland, Ore.; law enforcement killed the alleged assailant several days later.

Police were reported injured in 1% of the protests. A law enforcement officer killed in California was allegedly shot by supporters of the far-right “boogaloo” movement, not anti-racism protesters.

The killings in the line of duty of other law enforcement officers during this period were not related to the protests.

Only 3.7% of the protests involved property damage or vandalism. Some portion of these involved neither police nor protesters, but people engaging in vandalism or looting alongside the protests.

In short, our data suggest that 96.3% of events involved no property damage or police injuries, and in 97.7% of events, no injuries were reported among participants, bystanders or police.

These figures should correct the narrative that the protests were overtaken by rioting and vandalism or violence.



So like I said...
 
You didn't speak truth morn. Charlie Kirk cheered the deaths of blacks getting killed by police. So f Charlie Kirk. And:

The longstanding crisis of police violence and structural racism in America hit a new flashpoint this year. On 25 May 2020, Minneapolis police officers arrested George Floyd, a 46-year-old Black man, for allegedly using a counterfeit $20 bill. One officer pinned Floyd to the ground and kneeled on his neck for eight minutes and 15 seconds, killing him. Other officers looked on (BBC, 16 July 2020).

Floyd’s death prompted a surge of demonstrations associated with the Black Lives Matter (BLM)<a title="In this report, the acronym “BLM” is used to abbreviate the phrase “Black Lives Matter” when referring to the movement writ large. It is not meant to suggest all associated events are directly affiliated with the national BLM organization." "Demonstrations and Political Violence in America: New Data for Summer 2020"3movement that quickly spread from Minneapolis throughout the country. Between 26 May, the day after Floyd’s death, and 22 August, ACLED records over 7,750 demonstrations linked to the BLM movement across more than 2,440 locations in all 50 states and Washington, DC.

An Overwhelmingly Peaceful Movement

The vast majority of demonstration events associated with the BLM movement are non-violent. In more than 93% of all demonstrations connected to the movement, demonstrators have not engaged in violence or destructive activity. Peaceful protests are reported in over 2,400 distinct locations around the country. Violent demonstrations, meanwhile, have been limited to fewer than 220 locations — under 10% of the areas that experienced peaceful protests. In many urban areas like Portland, Oregon, for example, which has seen sustained unrest since Floyd’s killing, violent demonstrations are largely confined to specific blocks, rather than dispersed throughout the city (CNN, 1 September 2020).

Yet, despite data indicating that demonstrations associated with the BLM movement are overwhelmingly peaceful, one recent poll suggested that 42% of respondents believe “most protesters [associated with the BLM movement] are trying to incite violence or destroy property” (FiveThirtyEight, 5 June 2020). This is in line with the Civiqs tracking poll which finds that “net approval for the Black Lives Matter movement peaked back on June 3 [the week following the killing of George Floyd when riots first began to be reported] and has fallen sharply since” (USA Today, 31 August 2020; Civiqs, 29 August 2020).

Research from the University of Washington indicates that this disparity stems from political orientation and biased media framing (Washington Post, 24 August 2020), such as disproportionate coverage of violent demonstrations (Business Insider, 11 June 2020; Poynter, 25 June 2020). Groups like the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) have documented organized disinformation campaigns aimed at spreading a “deliberate mischaracterization of groups or movements [involved in the protests], such as portraying activists who support Black Lives Matter as violent extremists or claiming that antifa is a terrorist organization coordinated or manipulated by nebulous external forces” (ADL, 2020). These disinformation campaigns may be contributing to the decline in public support for the BLM movement after the initial increase following Floyd’s killing, especially amongst the white population (USA Today, 31 August 2020; Civiqs, 30 August 2020a, 30 August 2020b). This waning support also comes as the Trump administration recently shifted its “law and order” messaging to target local Democratic Party politicians from urban areas, particularly on the campaign trail (NPR, 27 August 2020).

Despite the media focus on looting and vandalism, however, there is little evidence to suggest that demonstrators have engaged in widespread violence. In some cases where demonstrations did turn violent, there are reports of agents provocateurs — or infiltrators — instigating the violence. During a demonstration on 27 May in Minneapolis, for example, a man with an umbrella — dubbed the ‘umbrella man’ by the media and later identified as a member of the Hells Angels linked to the Aryan Cowboys, a white supremacist prison and street gang — was seen smashing store windows (Forbes, 30 May 2020; KSTP, 28 July 2020). It was one of the first reports of destructive activity that day, and it “created an atmosphere of hostility and tension” that helped spark an outbreak of looting following initially peaceful protests, according to police investigators, who believe the man “wanted to sow discord and racial unrest” (New York Times, 28 July 2020). In another example on 29 May in Detroit, a number of non-residents reportedly traveled to the city to engage in violent behavior during a demonstration, leading to multiple arrests (MLive, 2 June 2020).

The Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project, Demonstrations & Political Violence In America: New Data for Summer 2020, Demonstrations and Political Violence in America: New Data for Summer 2020

(This was initially published by the Harvard Radcliffe Institute, October 20, 2020. However, that webpage appears to no longer exist.)

The Black Lives Matter uprisings were remarkably nonviolent. When there was violence, very often police or counterprotesters were reportedly directing it at the protesters.

When the Department of Homeland Security released its Homeland Threat Assessment earlier this month, it emphasized that self-proclaimed white supremacist groups are the most dangerous threat to U.S. security. But the report misleadingly added that there had been “over 100 days of violence and destruction in our cities,” referring to the anti-racism uprisings of this past summer.

In fact, the Black Lives Matter uprisings were remarkably nonviolent. When there was violence, very often police or counterprotesters were reportedly directing it at the protesters.

First, police made arrests in 5% of the protest events, with over 8,500 reported arrests (or possibly more). Police used tear gas or related chemical substances in 2.5% of these events.

Protesters or bystanders were reported injured in 1.6 percent of the protests. In total, at least three Black Lives Matter protesters and one other person were killed while protesting in Omaha, Austin and Kenosha, Wis. One anti-fascist protester killed a far-right group member during a confrontation in Portland, Ore.; law enforcement killed the alleged assailant several days later.

Police were reported injured in 1% of the protests. A law enforcement officer killed in California was allegedly shot by supporters of the far-right “boogaloo” movement, not anti-racism protesters.

The killings in the line of duty of other law enforcement officers during this period were not related to the protests.

Only 3.7% of the protests involved property damage or vandalism. Some portion of these involved neither police nor protesters, but people engaging in vandalism or looting alongside the protests.

In short, our data suggest that 96.3% of events involved no property damage or police injuries, and in 97.7% of events, no injuries were reported among participants, bystanders or police.

These figures should correct the narrative that the protests were overtaken by rioting and vandalism or violence.



So like I said...
So like you said... And yet everything I said is still right. Your 'mostly peaceful' riots were in fact not mostly peaceful. Damages were made to cities that went into millions if dollars. Rioters even tried to set a police station on fire with officers still inside after they tried sealing the building first. Then there's the infamous CHOP. So peaceful, right? These people in general were so angry and violent, they chased down a 16 year old kid and tried to kill him simply because he was attempting to put out a fire. Thankfully he was able to protect himself.

Show where Kirk celebrated the death of anyone because they were black. Also, you just proved you're okay with killing political opponents just because you dislike them.
 

What type of person prefers a fascist government?​

Neo-leftists.
 
Yup. 2020 was American fascism at its worst
So was 2021, 2022, 2023 and 2024. The American people democratically voted the fascists out of power in a desperate attempt to stop the neo-leftists before they could establish deep roots and indefinite power. One extremely brave candidate and 77 million patriots defeated the neo-fascists in the important 2024 battle. But they still aren't beaten completely and large remnants remain. You only need a handful of cockroaches to eventually create another massive infestation. Winning the battles of 2026 and 2028 are crucial to keep the cockroaches scurrying.
 
When I was in university,.one of the requirements was that we.had to take a humanities class. One philosopher in particular claimed that the truly strong do not bully the weak due to their position of strength, as a function of them being strong.they don't hurt the weak. Fascists however, are inherently weak people who enjoy bullying the meek. The strong are the honourable men who fight them. I use the analogy occassionally that U.S authorities go after those who abuse power, be it organized crime, kingpin dealers or terrorists. That is the sign of truly strong men. They dont bully the weak, they target the powerful. Other countries, have cowardly.agencies with low self esteem and inferiority complexes so they target the weak. THAT is the impetus of fascism. Weak men getting together to harm even weaker men. Eventually.the strong men, accustomed to fighting alone wll gather other strong men and defeat the bullies of fascism. Never be a coward or a bully. The more such people exist,.the easier fascism prospers. Confront bullies with power, not the meek and vulnerable and avoid fascism.
 
AI Overview


Since beginning his second, non-consecutive term in January 2025, Donald Trump's administration has been cited for multiple instances of defying judicial and legal rules
. Some of these actions have been blocked by lower federal courts, though observers note the Supreme Court has often sided with the administration.
Examples of Trump's administration not obeying court rules in his second term include:

Actions targeting law firms and federal employees
  • Executive orders against law firms: In March 2025, President Trump issued executive orders that targeted prominent law firms, such as Perkins Coie LLP and Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison. The orders revoked security clearances, restricted access to federal buildings, and terminated government contracts, allegedly in retaliation for these firms representing clients involved in investigations against the president. A federal judge ruled that at least one of these executive orders was unconstitutional, citing violations of the Bill of Rights.
  • Regulatory disregard: The administration reportedly directed the Office of Personnel Management to disregard a regulation that protected federal employees from reclassification into positions where they could be fired at will. This was seen as a move to shift large numbers of federal workers from the competitive service to at-will positions, and a disregard of established rule-making procedures.

Interference with federal funding
  • Federal grant freezes: In February 2025, a federal judge in Rhode Island found that the White House had defied a previous court order to unfreeze federal grant and program funds. The judge, U.S. District Judge John McConnell Jr., ordered the administration to immediately end the funding pause. The court order followed comments from Vice President JD Vance, who suggested judges could not challenge the president's "legitimate power".

Defiance of lower court rulings
  • Ignoring a deportation order: The White House was accused of defying a judge's order concerning deportation flights in March 2025, according to a report from Chatham House. The administration was reported to have given the go-ahead for the flights despite the ruling. This incident occurred around the same time the Supreme Court limited lower courts' power to issue nationwide injunctions, a decision that critics say emboldens the administration.
  • Immigration rule changes: The National Immigration Law Center released a report in January 2025 detailing how several of the administration's "Day 1 Executive Actions" defied the Constitution and long-standing legal norms. These included actions related to repealing birthright citizenship, invoking emergency declarations, and seeking to expand expedited removal procedures.

Efforts to consolidate power
  • Firing federal officials: The administration summarily fired federal prosecutors who had been involved in cases against Trump or those related to the January 6th events. Critics argue this action violates civil service protections that protect federal workers from being arbitrarily fired without cause and a hearing.
  • Seeking a third term: While the Constitution prohibits a president from being elected more than twice, Trump has publicly entertained the idea of serving a third term, leading to speculation and concern. He has also displayed "Trump 2028" hats, and his allies have spoken of a plan for him to stay in office. Though Trump has recently conceded that running again is unlikely, his previous comments and actions have
Your AI list some stuff and says that the SCOTUS often sided when the administration

So in other words saying it was legal and constitutional

Try again. Dembot
 
15th post
Your AI list some stuff and says that the SCOTUS often sided when the administration

So in other words saying it was legal and constitutional

Try again. Dembot
Trump cult members cannot handle the truth. They live in a bubble defined by Donald Trump.
 
Trump cult members cannot handle the truth. They live in a bubble defined by Donald Trump.
The truth that the SCOTUS said most of that stuff was perfectly Constitutional and legal? I can handle that, that's what your AI said
 
The truth that the SCOTUS said most of that stuff was perfectly Constitutional and legal? I can handle that, that's what your AI said
You are not in control of your mind. Trump is your mind.
 
Back
Top Bottom