Hang on Sloopy
Diamond Member
- Jul 12, 2015
- 20,793
- 28,072
- 2,288
- Banned
- #161
Hey Ottie. Anyone of importance who dared to speak about fraud had their family and themselves well being challenged. How would you react if someone was going to harm you, fake or not.Yeah, about those affidavits that were never used in the court filings.Affidavits signed under oath are not "hearsay."The courts needed proof to rule on not idiotic heresay.No it is not. The courts refused to hear it. Stop lying.If no evidence was heard how would you know that? You lose.No. It is the truth against the real big lie. Absolutely everything points to fraud. The withholding of ballots and machines. The censorship so fraud was not discussed and people like insisting there was not. If there was no fraud this would be over because cases with evidence would have been heard and machines would audited.Massive fraud is the retelling of the Big Lie.That does not change the fact there was massive fraud. Even it if were true.Oh we can process it. You idiots look like MF fools out there. The world is laughing at that Vegetable and the dumb shit stains like yourself hereThe anti-American Rubepublicans who hate the sovereign will of the people continue to believe The Big Lie because they’re emotional snowflakes who can’t process that their Orange God lost.
lol
The world is laughing at Qult45. You dumb mouth breathers are comedy.
Then no fraud would be proven. That Democrats did nothing but yell traitor is obvious guilt. No scrutiny has been allowed, let alone transparency. They did nothing to prove election integrity.
No fraud was proven. The cases weren't heard because there was no evidence to prove the claims. FaceBook posts, and videos with conspiracy theory voice overs do no constitute "evidence" in a court of law.
Because the Qult45 'evidence' is hearsay and butthurt? Yeah, that's definitely the case.
Why was that?