Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I would consider an attack on Japan or S Korea an attack on usIf they attack us.
Then move to Japan or S Korea.I would consider an attack on Japan or S Korea an attack on usIf they attack us.
North Korea is Bluffing… Again
Lol what?North Korea is Bluffing… Again
If North Korea attacks anybody. Which there's zero chance they will.would that crazy fat fuck have to actually bomb Seoul or Japan?
I don't want a war; but this situation is scary
still hopeful that there is a way out; but at best we are back to 1960s - 90s style MAD
would that crazy fat fuck have to actually bomb Seoul or Japan?
I don't want a war; but this situation is scary
still hopeful that there is a way out; but at best we are back to 1960s - 90s style MAD
probably best to get used to a nuke armed 'nork' land . That being said , i'd nuke'em now . Its going to be WAR eventually and the 'norks' are still weakish compared to what they will be in a year or more in the future .
Consideration of once again producing the Neutron Bomb might be too little and too late but would be a great tool if military action against N.K. became necessary.
See: Neutron bomb - Wikipedia
Kim wants to deter regime change. It's the first thing out of NKorea negotiator's mouths when they were negotiating with Bush. They believe that the US will do to them what we did to Noriega, Saddam and Qadafi. He believes that having a nuclear capacity is his only protection.would that crazy fat fuck have to actually bomb Seoul or Japan?
I don't want a war; but this situation is scary
still hopeful that there is a way out; but at best we are back to 1960s - 90s style MAD
---------------------------------------------- probably TOO LATE , what , take a few months or years to build and stockpile 'neutron bombs' and then threaten to use them . ------- I didn't read the link as i vaguely remember what the neutron bomb is , wasn't it talked about or built in the 80s WCatcher ??Consideration of once again producing the Neutron Bomb might be too little and too late but would be a great tool if military action against N.K. became necessary.
See: Neutron bomb - Wikipedia
The US has troops in Japan and SK. I was stationed in SK for over a year.Then move to Japan or S Korea.I would consider an attack on Japan or S Korea an attack on usIf they attack us.
"Interestingly South Koreans don't really pay attention to Kim's blathering threats. They deal with it every day"Kim wants to deter regime change. It's the first thing out of NKorea negotiator's mouths when they were negotiating with Bush. They believe that the US will do to them what we did to Noriega, Saddam and Qadafi. He believes that having a nuclear capacity is his only protection.would that crazy fat fuck have to actually bomb Seoul or Japan?
I don't want a war; but this situation is scary
still hopeful that there is a way out; but at best we are back to 1960s - 90s style MAD
Couple of facts:
Clinton negotiated a deal in 94 that restricted NK from pursuing fissile material. They cheated, looking for uranium rather than plutonium.
When Dubya took over he knew they were cheated and refused to negotiate... until 2006 when they detonated their first baby bomb..
Then Dubya ran back to the negotiating table.
Interestingly South Koreans don't really pay attention to Kim's blathering threats. They deal with it every day.
So (you didn't ask but I'm volunteering) what I'd do:
-> Don't over-react. Don't fall into a bluster/bravado match with a 33 year old. "Don't wrestle in the mud with a pig, you'll both get dirty and the pig will love it."
-> Tell them, without bluster or bravado, that if they attack US interests they will be attacked. Define "US interests very clearly to include actions (not threats) against our allies, and include missile tests that overfly allies if you want, although that is a bit tricky given altitude telemetry etc.
-> Tell them, without an attack on US interests as defined, we will not pursue preemptive regime change. (We will however do all the spying and cyberattacks that we want).
-> Work on intensifying sanctions when NK does stuff like they did today. China is the key here, and we need their help.
-> For God's sake don't pick this week to tell South Korea that you might back out of a trade deal with them. Timing is everything, and maybe wait a month or two, maybe? And try to avoid pissing off the entire South Korean population by tweeting that they might be appeasers. All anyone talked about in S Korea Monday am their time was President Trump calling them appeasers. That's the way they heard it even if that isn't exactly what he said.