Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Israel's apologists and the Martin Luther King Jr. hoax | The Electronic IntifadaIn formal logic, Argumentum Ad Verecundiam refers to arguing a point with an appeal to authority. This type is categorized as a logical fallacy. Citing one seemingly authoritative source is simply not conclusive evidence, even if the authority is seen as an expert on the given subject.
For the sake of clarity, there are three degradations of this maxim enumerated in this essay. First, it is especially fallacious as proof when the quoted authority demonstrates no special knowledge on the subject. Second, when the authority who is not an expert on the given subject is also quoted out of context, the argument is even weaker. Third, the lowest violation of this formal logic principle is when an advocate uses a false rendition, or a fabricated quote, by the same authority who can claim no expertise.
This is the best framework for understanding how various exponents of Israel have used Martin Luther King Jr. to promote their cause.
Bwahahahahah! "the electronic intifada"? Even his words are not enough, are they? You are a true heyvoun.Israel's apologists and the Martin Luther King Jr. hoax | The Electronic IntifadaIn formal logic, Argumentum Ad Verecundiam refers to arguing a point with an appeal to authority. This type is categorized as a logical fallacy. Citing one seemingly authoritative source is simply not conclusive evidence, even if the authority is seen as an expert on the given subject.
For the sake of clarity, there are three degradations of this maxim enumerated in this essay. First, it is especially fallacious as proof when the quoted authority demonstrates no special knowledge on the subject. Second, when the authority who is not an expert on the given subject is also quoted out of context, the argument is even weaker. Third, the lowest violation of this formal logic principle is when an advocate uses a false rendition, or a fabricated quote, by the same authority who can claim no expertise.
This is the best framework for understanding how various exponents of Israel have used Martin Luther King Jr. to promote their cause.
Electronic Intifada: Propaganda or Education?Israel's apologists and the Martin Luther King Jr. hoax | The Electronic IntifadaIn formal logic, Argumentum Ad Verecundiam refers to arguing a point with an appeal to authority. This type is categorized as a logical fallacy. Citing one seemingly authoritative source is simply not conclusive evidence, even if the authority is seen as an expert on the given subject.
For the sake of clarity, there are three degradations of this maxim enumerated in this essay. First, it is especially fallacious as proof when the quoted authority demonstrates no special knowledge on the subject. Second, when the authority who is not an expert on the given subject is also quoted out of context, the argument is even weaker. Third, the lowest violation of this formal logic principle is when an advocate uses a false rendition, or a fabricated quote, by the same authority who can claim no expertise.
This is the best framework for understanding how various exponents of Israel have used Martin Luther King Jr. to promote their cause.
Bwahahahahah! "the electronic intifada"? Even his words are not enough, are they? You are a true heyvoun.Israel's apologists and the Martin Luther King Jr. hoax | The Electronic IntifadaIn formal logic, Argumentum Ad Verecundiam refers to arguing a point with an appeal to authority. This type is categorized as a logical fallacy. Citing one seemingly authoritative source is simply not conclusive evidence, even if the authority is seen as an expert on the given subject.
For the sake of clarity, there are three degradations of this maxim enumerated in this essay. First, it is especially fallacious as proof when the quoted authority demonstrates no special knowledge on the subject. Second, when the authority who is not an expert on the given subject is also quoted out of context, the argument is even weaker. Third, the lowest violation of this formal logic principle is when an advocate uses a false rendition, or a fabricated quote, by the same authority who can claim no expertise.
This is the best framework for understanding how various exponents of Israel have used Martin Luther King Jr. to promote their cause.
Those comments are after the 1967 war, so that makes you totally and utterly wrong. Apparently Dr. king saw the Muslims as the criminals and aggressors. It didn't take a giant leap of faith either.Had M.L.K. lived a few more years. He would have undoubtably been one of Israel's strongest critics.
Israel was one if the strongest supporters of the apartheid South African government. And was an active trading partner of weapons and goods long after most countries of the world had boycotted that racist and fascist state.
"Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi wrote in 1988 that the alliance between South Africa and Israel was one of the most underreported news stories of the past four decades and that Israel played a crucial role in the survival of the apartheid regime. Israel's collaboration with Apartheid South Africa was mentioned and condemned by various international organizations like the UN General assembly (several times since 1974".
Israel?South Africa relations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
M.L.K. was killed in 1968.Those comments are after the 1967 war, so that makes you totally and utterly wrong.
Look idiot, 1967 was the war that Israel captured all those territories that you animals dispute as occupied. Despite all the wars Dr. King witnessed, he was still a Zionist and supporter of the state of Israel as of 1968 before his death.. Eat shit. God Bless Dr. King's soul.M.L.K. was killed in 1968.Those comments are after the 1967 war, so that makes you totally and utterly wrong.
"By 1987 Israel found itself alone among the developed nations in still maintaining strong, even strategic relations with apartheid South Africa. (Among African nations, only Malawi maintained diplomatic relations with South Africa throughout the Apartheid era.)
Israel?South Africa relations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Nah, you're thinking of Nation of Islam animals like yourself. Most blacks and Jews are close friends and know that Jews were and are the most active in civil rights causes.The older black people in the U.S. still remember how the Jews and Israel continued to support and fund the apartheid government of South Africa.
Which is one of the many reasons why African Americans don't like jews.