Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Every holiday the internet is full of these crybabies even though the DUI searches make more legal sense than the airport searches everyone accepts. The fourth amendment protects you from UNREASONABLE searches and DUI checkpoints seen reasonable to me. Most of these complainers are shills hired by the auto industry. The car makers love drunk drivers, Car crashes mean car sales
They dont allow them in Texas. Thank God. If it was about public safety they should arrest them as they come out of the bars. But public intoxication doesnt pay as much as a DUI.
Every holiday the internet is full of these crybabies even though the DUI searches make more legal sense than the airport searches everyone accepts. The fourth amendment protects you from UNREASONABLE searches and DUI checkpoints seen reasonable to me. Most of these complainers are shills hired by the auto industry. The car makers love drunk drivers, Car crashes mean car sales
The Fourth Amendment then goes on to outline what a reasonable search would entail, your own opinion notwithstanding.
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
In other words, a warrant is required, and these checkpoints are, in fact, unconstitutional.
They dont allow them in Texas. Thank God. If it was about public safety they should arrest them as they come out of the bars. But public intoxication doesnt pay as much as a DUI.
The Fourth Amendment then goes on to outline what a reasonable search would entail, your own opinion notwithstanding.
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
In other words, a warrant is required, and these checkpoints are, in fact, unconstitutional.
HAHAHA. You are saying a cop ALWAYS needs a warrant to search someone? That is nonsense.
think
The Fourth Amendment then goes on to outline what a reasonable search would entail, your own opinion notwithstanding.
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
In other words, a warrant is required, and these checkpoints are, in fact, unconstitutional.
HAHAHA. You are saying a cop ALWAYS needs a warrant to search someone? That is nonsense.
think
They dont allow them in Texas. Thank God. If it was about public safety they should arrest them as they come out of the bars. But public intoxication doesnt pay as much as a DUI.
If it was about public safety, we'd make DUI an automatic felony. That's what i'd love to see.
Every holiday the internet is full of these crybabies even though the DUI searches make more legal sense than the airport searches everyone accepts. The fourth amendment protects you from UNREASONABLE searches and DUI checkpoints seen reasonable to me. Most of these complainers are shills hired by the auto industry. The car makers love drunk drivers, Car crashes mean car sales
Years ago I called my brother to see if he wanted to slam down some beers. I was already loaded.
So I got in my car to drive across town. I was heading west through campus town and the cops were checking everyone going east.
On the way home (yet more drunk) there were the same cops, stopping all the west bound traffic.
LOL
Disclaimer: Don't drink and drive...
The Fourth Amendment then goes on to outline what a reasonable search would entail, your own opinion notwithstanding.
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
In other words, a warrant is required, and these checkpoints are, in fact, unconstitutional.
HAHAHA. You are saying a cop ALWAYS needs a warrant to search someone? That is nonsense.
think
Maybe you should try thinking. Probable cause is also grounds for a search, but DUI checkpoints do not meet even that relatively flimsy criteria.
If it was about public safety, we'd make DUI an automatic felony. That's what i'd love to see.
I think thats a little harsh,and it's hard for the prosecution to convict on something that might have happened.
.
If it was about public safety, we'd make DUI an automatic felony. That's what i'd love to see.
I think thats a little harsh,and it's hard for the prosecution to convict on something that might have happened.
.
What do you mean "might have happened".? If you're saying drunk driving by itself, without an accompanying crash, does not harm anyone, then so too for mere cocaine possession. But people caught with coke on their person are convicted of felonies every day. THINK
[
They are unreasonable as the cops are stopping you because you might be doing something illegal not because they have any probable cause.
Yes, I think DUI checkpoints, inspection stick checkpoints, game warden checkpoints (just driving a pick-up truck is the excuse for making you stop) and seat belt stops should all be declared unconstitutional. These stops are akin to police officers walking down the street and knocking on every door to ask for your ID and "just chat" with you for a little while.
