Stop the Spin. Leaked Emails Are Not Altered and Are True

Whether the emails are legit or not, some at least aren't being portrayed accurately. Such as the rigging of polls, it's simply not the case.
The emails are true and accurately portrayed, if not Hillary would contest them and she has not because she can't

No, Hillary isn't going to directly say anything as to the veracity of the emails, that would be unwise.

The Clinton campaign is not rigging polls and the Clinton campaign is not calling black people stupid. Two idiotic claims being made by the right.
they also did not take algeria of a terror watch list due to a contribution to the CGI.
 
Whether the emails are legit or not, some at least aren't being portrayed accurately. Such as the rigging of polls, it's simply not the case.
The emails are true and accurately portrayed, if not Hillary would contest them and she has not because she can't

No, Hillary isn't going to directly say anything as to the veracity of the emails, that would be unwise.

The Clinton campaign is not rigging polls and the Clinton campaign is not calling black people stupid. Two idiotic claims being made by the right.
they also did not take algeria of a terror watch list due to a contribution to the CGI.


There is a lot of innuendo in these leaks but very little substance.
 
OK you Hillary loving spin merchants, the leaked emails have not been altered by the Russians or by anyone else. They are Hillary's emails and they are true. You can cease with your spinning.

SHOCKWAVE: Hillary’s Campaign CONFESSES, Admits These WikiLeaks Emails Are True
The link you provided to support your claim is ambiguous at best. I read it and remain unconvinced..

Here are the bones of my contention.

your link said:
Of course, the emails have been scrutinized by technology experts and proven to be unaltered.

And just who are these experts? Shouldn’t the author of this indictment of Hillary know? My skepticism meter swung wildly to the high point when I saw this blurp.


your link said:
“They are clearly about her frame of mind or her mood,” one campaign source admitted.

One campaign source? WTF is that? C'mon folks..you can do better than that. If you ae going to put forth such serious allegations you had better identify the sources, Otherwise it is just conjectural BS!

The bones of your contention........................LOL
In this case the "bones" are a solid foundation for the flesh of my narrative.
 
OK you Hillary loving spin merchants, the leaked emails have not been altered by the Russians or by anyone else. They are Hillary's emails and they are true. You can cease with your spinning.

SHOCKWAVE: Hillary’s Campaign CONFESSES, Admits These WikiLeaks Emails Are True
The link you provided to support your claim is ambiguous at best. I read it and remain unconvinced..

Here are the bones of my contention.

your link said:
Of course, the emails have been scrutinized by technology experts and proven to be unaltered.

And just who are these experts? Shouldn’t the author of this indictment of Hillary know? My skepticism meter swung wildly to the high point when I saw this blurp.


your link said:
“They are clearly about her frame of mind or her mood,” one campaign source admitted.

One campaign source? WTF is that? C'mon folks..you can do better than that. If you ae going to put forth such serious allegations you had better identify the sources, Otherwise it is just conjectural BS!

The bones of your contention........................LOL
In this case the "bones" are a solid foundation for the flesh of my narrative.

Actually, one might suppose given the title of the link I provided, that even a simpleton such as yourself might be able to use the exact wording of the provided link to actually input that wording into the search field of your own search engine and be exposed to other links from other sources whereby you could pick and choose the source you wish to read. My mistake was thinking you might actually be capable of accomplishing some degree of intelligence on your own.
 
OK you Hillary loving spin merchants, the leaked emails have not been altered by the Russians or by anyone else. They are Hillary's emails and they are true. You can cease with your spinning.

SHOCKWAVE: Hillary’s Campaign CONFESSES, Admits These WikiLeaks Emails Are True
Trump is so anti-American that he uses the Russians and criminal hackers to destroy this country.

The Castro Brothers and a KGB news rag have endorsed the Socialist Hillary.
 
OK you Hillary loving spin merchants, the leaked emails have not been altered by the Russians or by anyone else. They are Hillary's emails and they are true. You can cease with your spinning.

SHOCKWAVE: Hillary’s Campaign CONFESSES, Admits These WikiLeaks Emails Are True
Trump is so anti-American that he uses the Russians and criminal hackers to destroy this country.

The Castro Brothers and a KGB news rag have endorsed the Socialist Hillary.
Deflection of the fact.
 
OK you Hillary loving spin merchants, the leaked emails have not been altered by the Russians or by anyone else. They are Hillary's emails and they are true. You can cease with your spinning.

SHOCKWAVE: Hillary’s Campaign CONFESSES, Admits These WikiLeaks Emails Are True
The link you provided to support your claim is ambiguous at best. I read it and remain unconvinced..

Here are the bones of my contention.

your link said:
Of course, the emails have been scrutinized by technology experts and proven to be unaltered.

And just who are these experts? Shouldn’t the author of this indictment of Hillary know? My skepticism meter swung wildly to the high point when I saw this blurp.


your link said:
“They are clearly about her frame of mind or her mood,” one campaign source admitted.

One campaign source? WTF is that? C'mon folks..you can do better than that. If you ae going to put forth such serious allegations you had better identify the sources, Otherwise it is just conjectural BS!

The bones of your contention........................LOL
In this case the "bones" are a solid foundation for the flesh of my narrative.

Actually, one might suppose given the title of the link I provided, that even a simpleton such as yourself might be able to use the exact wording of the provided link to actually input that wording into the search field of your own search engine and be exposed to other links from other sources whereby you could pick and choose the source you wish to read. My mistake was thinking you might actually be capable of accomplishing some degree of intelligence on your own.
STFU. This is a message board not a frigging library. The author of your link made stupid statements without providing names and sources to back them up. That kind of specious BS is just unvalidated propaganda written by some amateur rabble trying to get a rise out of idiots like YOU!
 
OK you Hillary loving spin merchants, the leaked emails have not been altered by the Russians or by anyone else. They are Hillary's emails and they are true. You can cease with your spinning.

SHOCKWAVE: Hillary’s Campaign CONFESSES, Admits These WikiLeaks Emails Are True
Trump is so anti-American that he uses the Russians and criminal hackers to destroy this country.

The Castro Brothers and a KGB news rag have endorsed the Socialist Hillary.
Deflection of the fact.

Hardly. You must first provide proof that the Russians actually hacked anything at all. The facts are that the Castro Brothers and the KGB rag did endorse Hillary.
 
OK you Hillary loving spin merchants, the leaked emails have not been altered by the Russians or by anyone else. They are Hillary's emails and they are true. You can cease with your spinning.

SHOCKWAVE: Hillary’s Campaign CONFESSES, Admits These WikiLeaks Emails Are True
The link you provided to support your claim is ambiguous at best. I read it and remain unconvinced..

Here are the bones of my contention.

your link said:
Of course, the emails have been scrutinized by technology experts and proven to be unaltered.

And just who are these experts? Shouldn’t the author of this indictment of Hillary know? My skepticism meter swung wildly to the high point when I saw this blurp.


your link said:
“They are clearly about her frame of mind or her mood,” one campaign source admitted.

One campaign source? WTF is that? C'mon folks..you can do better than that. If you ae going to put forth such serious allegations you had better identify the sources, Otherwise it is just conjectural BS!

The bones of your contention........................LOL
In this case the "bones" are a solid foundation for the flesh of my narrative.

Actually, one might suppose given the title of the link I provided, that even a simpleton such as yourself might be able to use the exact wording of the provided link to actually input that wording into the search field of your own search engine and be exposed to other links from other sources whereby you could pick and choose the source you wish to read. My mistake was thinking you might actually be capable of accomplishing some degree of intelligence on your own.
STFU. This is a message board not a frigging library. The author of your link made stupid statements without providing names and sources to back them up. That kind of specious BS is just unvalidated propaganda written by some amateur rabble trying to get a rise out of idiots like YOU!

And the fact that you are simply too ignorant to input into your own search engine the exact words to the link I provided.
 
The link you provided to support your claim is ambiguous at best. I read it and remain unconvinced..

Here are the bones of my contention.

And just who are these experts? Shouldn’t the author of this indictment of Hillary know? My skepticism meter swung wildly to the high point when I saw this blurp.




One campaign source? WTF is that? C'mon folks..you can do better than that. If you ae going to put forth such serious allegations you had better identify the sources, Otherwise it is just conjectural BS!

The bones of your contention........................LOL
In this case the "bones" are a solid foundation for the flesh of my narrative.

Actually, one might suppose given the title of the link I provided, that even a simpleton such as yourself might be able to use the exact wording of the provided link to actually input that wording into the search field of your own search engine and be exposed to other links from other sources whereby you could pick and choose the source you wish to read. My mistake was thinking you might actually be capable of accomplishing some degree of intelligence on your own.
STFU. This is a message board not a frigging library. The author of your link made stupid statements without providing names and sources to back them up. That kind of specious BS is just unvalidated propaganda written by some amateur rabble trying to get a rise out of idiots like YOU!

And the fact that you are simply too ignorant to input into your own search engine the exact words to the link I provided.
You are just too stupid for intelligent communication. How the F—k do you google phrases like "one source" to find out what that source is? And those un named "technology experts" might be found with extensive digging and days of research. But who on a message board has time for that except people who live on one? KMA and find better links.
 
The bones of your contention........................LOL
In this case the "bones" are a solid foundation for the flesh of my narrative.

Actually, one might suppose given the title of the link I provided, that even a simpleton such as yourself might be able to use the exact wording of the provided link to actually input that wording into the search field of your own search engine and be exposed to other links from other sources whereby you could pick and choose the source you wish to read. My mistake was thinking you might actually be capable of accomplishing some degree of intelligence on your own.
STFU. This is a message board not a frigging library. The author of your link made stupid statements without providing names and sources to back them up. That kind of specious BS is just unvalidated propaganda written by some amateur rabble trying to get a rise out of idiots like YOU!

And the fact that you are simply too ignorant to input into your own search engine the exact words to the link I provided.
You are just too stupid for intelligent communication. How the F—k do you google phrases like "one source" to find out what that source is? And those un named "technology experts" might be found with extensive digging and days of research. But who on a message board has time for that except people who live on one? KMA and find better links.

It must really be hell to be as stupid as you. My ten year old grandson has more savvy than you.
 
In this case the "bones" are a solid foundation for the flesh of my narrative.

Actually, one might suppose given the title of the link I provided, that even a simpleton such as yourself might be able to use the exact wording of the provided link to actually input that wording into the search field of your own search engine and be exposed to other links from other sources whereby you could pick and choose the source you wish to read. My mistake was thinking you might actually be capable of accomplishing some degree of intelligence on your own.
STFU. This is a message board not a frigging library. The author of your link made stupid statements without providing names and sources to back them up. That kind of specious BS is just unvalidated propaganda written by some amateur rabble trying to get a rise out of idiots like YOU!

And the fact that you are simply too ignorant to input into your own search engine the exact words to the link I provided.
You are just too stupid for intelligent communication. How the F—k do you google phrases like "one source" to find out what that source is? And those un named "technology experts" might be found with extensive digging and days of research. But who on a message board has time for that except people who live on one? KMA and find better links.

It must really be hell to be as stupid as you. My ten year old grandson has more savvy than you.
You link looks like a ten year old wrote it!
 
Actually, one might suppose given the title of the link I provided, that even a simpleton such as yourself might be able to use the exact wording of the provided link to actually input that wording into the search field of your own search engine and be exposed to other links from other sources whereby you could pick and choose the source you wish to read. My mistake was thinking you might actually be capable of accomplishing some degree of intelligence on your own.
STFU. This is a message board not a frigging library. The author of your link made stupid statements without providing names and sources to back them up. That kind of specious BS is just unvalidated propaganda written by some amateur rabble trying to get a rise out of idiots like YOU!

And the fact that you are simply too ignorant to input into your own search engine the exact words to the link I provided.
You are just too stupid for intelligent communication. How the F—k do you google phrases like "one source" to find out what that source is? And those un named "technology experts" might be found with extensive digging and days of research. But who on a message board has time for that except people who live on one? KMA and find better links.

It must really be hell to be as stupid as you. My ten year old grandson has more savvy than you.
You link looks like a ten year old wrote it!

That just makes it even more evident that you are ignorant and below the level of a ten year old.
 
STFU. This is a message board not a frigging library. The author of your link made stupid statements without providing names and sources to back them up. That kind of specious BS is just unvalidated propaganda written by some amateur rabble trying to get a rise out of idiots like YOU!

And the fact that you are simply too ignorant to input into your own search engine the exact words to the link I provided.
You are just too stupid for intelligent communication. How the F—k do you google phrases like "one source" to find out what that source is? And those un named "technology experts" might be found with extensive digging and days of research. But who on a message board has time for that except people who live on one? KMA and find better links.

It must really be hell to be as stupid as you. My ten year old grandson has more savvy than you.
You link looks like a ten year old wrote it!

That just makes it even more evident that you are ignorant and below the level of a ten year old.
YAWNNN! is that all you got? Bye!
 
OK you Hillary loving spin merchants, the leaked emails have not been altered by the Russians or by anyone else. They are Hillary's emails and they are true. You can cease with your spinning.

SHOCKWAVE: Hillary’s Campaign CONFESSES, Admits These WikiLeaks Emails Are True
Trump is so anti-American that he uses the Russians and criminal hackers to destroy this country.

The Castro Brothers and a KGB news rag have endorsed the Socialist Hillary.
Deflection of the fact.

Hardly. You must first provide proof that the Russians actually hacked anything at all. The facts are that the Castro Brothers and the KGB rag did endorse Hillary.
Fact is, Trump said he hoped Russia would hack America's emails and expose Hillary. Your hero is a traitor.
 
OK you Hillary loving spin merchants, the leaked emails have not been altered by the Russians or by anyone else. They are Hillary's emails and they are true. You can cease with your spinning.

SHOCKWAVE: Hillary’s Campaign CONFESSES, Admits These WikiLeaks Emails Are True
Trump is so anti-American that he uses the Russians and criminal hackers to destroy this country.

The Castro Brothers and a KGB news rag have endorsed the Socialist Hillary.
Deflection of the fact.

Hardly. You must first provide proof that the Russians actually hacked anything at all. The facts are that the Castro Brothers and the KGB rag did endorse Hillary.
Fact is, Trump said he hoped Russia would hack America's emails and expose Hillary. Your hero is a traitor.

Well, he never funded ISIS or took money from folks who promote terrorism. Hillary has done both. Even the Castro Brothers endorsed Hillary.
 

Forum List

Back
Top