Stolen Elections

Hillary Clinton Campaign Pays $113,000 FEC Fine in Admission of Guilt for Producing Steele Dossier


The lead investigator for the House Intelligence Committee's 2018 probe into the FBI's investigation of alleged Trump–Russia collusion, Kash Patel, said the fact that the Hillary Clinton campaign is paying a penalty to Federal Election Commission (FEC) is an admittance of guilt. Clinton and DNC are doing so to bury the narrative and prevent more media coverage of these illegal activities, said Patel.

"I think the public sees what that is. It's their way of burying the narrative, because if they contested what happens, more media coverage, more people start looking into these things," Patel said.

"So the Hillary Clinton campaign is not contesting it, they're paying the fine. It's basically admitting that they did this and they're out is: 'we just don't want a protracted legal deal, as if the Hillary Clinton campaign and DNC ever shied away from taking something or someone to court," Patel added.

Clinton's campaign and the DNC agreed to pay a combined $113,000 to the FEC, according to documents made public on March 30, after the commission found probable cause that the entities violated federal law by describing payments that ultimately went to the Fusion GPS research group as going toward legal services and consulting.

Hillary Clinton Campaign Pays $113,000 FEC Fine in Admission of Guilt for Producing Steele Dossier -- Now Hopes Media Will Assist Them in Killing the Story

~~~
Bet some of these guys are looking for countries with no extradition treaties with the US.
 
Hillary Clinton Campaign Pays $113,000 FEC Fine in Admission of Guilt for Producing Steele Dossier


The lead investigator for the House Intelligence Committee's 2018 probe into the FBI's investigation of alleged Trump–Russia collusion, Kash Patel, said the fact that the Hillary Clinton campaign is paying a penalty to Federal Election Commission (FEC) is an admittance of guilt. Clinton and DNC are doing so to bury the narrative and prevent more media coverage of these illegal activities, said Patel.

"I think the public sees what that is. It's their way of burying the narrative, because if they contested what happens, more media coverage, more people start looking into these things," Patel said.

"So the Hillary Clinton campaign is not contesting it, they're paying the fine. It's basically admitting that they did this and they're out is: 'we just don't want a protracted legal deal, as if the Hillary Clinton campaign and DNC ever shied away from taking something or someone to court," Patel added.

Clinton's campaign and the DNC agreed to pay a combined $113,000 to the FEC, according to documents made public on March 30, after the commission found probable cause that the entities violated federal law by describing payments that ultimately went to the Fusion GPS research group as going toward legal services and consulting.

Hillary Clinton Campaign Pays $113,000 FEC Fine in Admission of Guilt for Producing Steele Dossier -- Now Hopes Media Will Assist Them in Killing the Story

~~~
Bet some of these guys are looking for countries with no extradition treaties with the US.

Fake news, Hillary paid only $8,000
 
....
"....A comprehensive but nonexhaustive database of voter and election fraud cases maintained by the conservative Heritage Foundation finds documented cases of fraud with mail ballots are more common than cases of in-person voter impersonation, ballot petition fraud, and registration fraud, but that overall rates of fraud are Infinitesimally Low.

Heritage's database identified 193 criminal convictions, civil penalties, diversions, or other official findings for fraudulent use of mail ballots between 2000 and 2020, a time period during which approximately 250 million mail ballots were cast.

As MIT elections scholar Charles Stewart and National Vote At Home Institute CEO Amber McReynolds noted in an April op-ed, that puts the rate of mail ballots resulting in criminal convictions at 0.0006% and the rate of mail ballots resulting in any kind of official action at 0.00007%.


Rates of fraud are also extremely low in states that send all voters ballots. Heritage's database reports Two documented cases of fraudulent use of mail ballots in Oregon, five in Colorado, six in Washington, and none in Hawaii or Utah over the past Fifteen years.

.....
Heritage's database has identified just 13 cases of in-person voter impersonation documented between six states over the past 16 years,
and a 2014 study from Loyola University Law School professor and elections scholar Justin Levitt found just 31 credible cases of voter impersonation between 2000 and 2014, a time period during which over one billion votes were cast....."


Americans are more likely to be struck by lightning than commit election fraud

`
 
Last edited:
1650075081728.png
 

Idiot.

 
Should be in conspiracy theories. There is no "clear evidence" at all.
They also tossed out the ballot Examiners here in detroit and everybody clapped when they did. Strange how NO JUDGE IN THE USA would even HEAR ANYTHING related to fraud. The DemoCraps did not steal the election, THE DEEP STATE DID. As far as evidence, the DemonRats did a fine job of destroying computer files and our state REVISED the voting laws just to accommodate allowing mail in ballots at 4am.
 
They also tossed out the ballot Examiners here in detroit and everybody clapped when they did. Strange how NO JUDGE IN THE USA would even HEAR ANYTHING related to fraud. The DemoCraps did not steal the election, THE DEEP STATE DID. As far as evidence, the DemonRats did a fine job of destroying computer files and our state REVISED the voting laws just to accommodate allowing mail in ballots at 4am.

They kicked out people who were being disruptive. There were still Democrats and Republicans who were not disruptive and not removed.
 

they are afraid of something. We all know what that is.
 

Forum List

Back
Top