"privately describing some of the claims of election fraud as "crazy,"

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

View attachment 1021072

Deflection noted

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Desperation time for you guys.

Deflection noted

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Facts?
Like men can’t become women?
Are you sure you know what a fact is?

Deflection noted

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Making up laws... judge shopping... disregarding supreme court rulings... releasing this latest news for election interference... lying about what Trump did and said... Smith should go to prison for treason....

Deflection noted

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

View attachment 1021399

Deflection noted

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

"Startling revelations"? Foolish attempt at drama from WAPO. The dirty little secret is that a crooked regime could indict any one of us for "conspiracy" if we disagreed with them politically. The sad thing is that the mainstream media that we should trust to tell the truth has become the willing stooge of the democrat party.

Deflection noted

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Jan. 6 should be seen as a great time in the history of our free country. Trump should be getting a medal for exposing election fraud. This country will cease to exist if people lose faith in our elections. Confidence in this administration is already at a record low. Back to MAGA

Deflection noted

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

A deranged obsessive zealot produces 163 pages containing 10 pages worth of material
This guy is so over the edge he will off himself if Trump is not hung

Deflection noted

 

[Rambunctious]

Deflection noted

Its not deflection... it may be hard hitting truth but its no deflection... These are the facts this is what Smith is doing...
If he wants to use these dirty tactics on real criminals and mob bosses that is fine with me... but to do this to a former president and leading candidate for president is treasonous....

Making up laws... judge shopping... disregarding supreme court rulings... releasing this latest news for election interference... lying about what Trump did and said... Smith should go to prison for treason....

 

[Rambunctious]

Deflection noted

That's all you got?... you should be embarrassed....

 

[Mac1958]

Deflection noted

The Trump orbit knows this is a lie. Most congresspeople know it's a lie. Most of the pundits know it's a lie.

Few of the rubes seem to know it's a lie.

So it just continues.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

The Trump orbit knows this is a lie. Most congresspeople know it's a lie. Most of the pundits know it's a lie.

Few of the rubes seem to know it's a lie.

So it just continues.

They've become married to it. They can't admit it now.

 

[Auld Phart]

Deflection noted

 

[Oddball]

Deflection noted

Vapid and dopey douchbaggery noted.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Vapid and dopey douchbaggery noted.

Face the topic then, sissy.

 

[wamose]

Deflection noted

Looks like someone learned a new word. Congrats. Now all you have to do is learn its meaning. MAGA

 

[Faun]

View attachment 1021399

They sure are. Trump's sentencing for 34 felonies is next month.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

 

[berg80]

Section II sets forth the legal principles governing claims of presidential immunity. It explains that, for each category of conduct that the Supreme Court has not yet addressed, this Court should first determine whether it was official or unofficial by analyzing the relevant “content, form, and context,” id. at 2340, to determine whether the defendant was acting in his official capacity or instead “in his capacity as a candidate for re-election.” Blassingame v. Trump, 87 F.4th 1, 17 (D.C. Cir. 2023). Where the defendant was acting “as office-seeker, not office-holder,” no immunity attaches. Id. (emphasis in original). For any conduct deemed official, the Court should next determine whether the presumption of immunity is rebutted, which requires the Government to show that “applying a criminal prohibition to that act would pose no ‘dangers of intrusion on the authority and functions of the Executive Branch.’” Trump, 144 S. Ct. at 2331-32 (quoting Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731, 754 (1982)).

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.258148/gov.uscourts.dcd.258148.252.0.pdf

 

[Lisa558]

This just sounds like the judge allowed to be published the charges Smith is alleging, without the defense’s rebuttal to them - which of course hasn’t happened yet.

More nasty politics from the Dems.