Still think this isn't fascism?

Iran can't be set back on a nuclear weapons program that they've never had.
Makes one wonder why you'd be making long range ballistic missile delivery systems...... capable of targeting the US and EU.
 
Your half of Congress conspiring to stop the rule of law against federal law enforcement kinda reeks somewhere between facism and authoritarianism.

May be the prescription when one party tosses the rule of law out the window.
8ee5yltg86l81.jpg
 
Makes one wonder why you'd be making long range ballistic missile delivery systems...... capable of targeting the US and EU.
Defense against the evil Zionist regime is one good reason!

And what country in the world is safe from US aggression?

Iran now has what Iraq needed.
 
There's another dynamic going on IMO. Bigotry lies at the core of what trump is doing. If you've ever watched Stephen Miller speak about immigration it comes thru loud and clear.

But there's a dynamic that's part of the trump regime found in all authoritarian movements. The demonization of "the other." Authoritarian regimes often blame specific groups for societal problems, diverting attention from the real causes and creating a common enemy for, in this case, Dotard's minions to unite against.
Correct.

Trump’s efforts to dehumanize others is classic fascism.
 
The demonization of "the other." Authoritarian regimes often blame specific groups for societal problems, diverting attention from the real causes and creating a common enemy for, in this case, Dotard's minions to unite against.
In this case it's your democrats creating the societal problems Trump and the republicans are trying to fix.
 
Awful long way to send a conventional warhead.

What, no air force or defense capability?
Iran, with the aid of Russia and China, has developed the needed weapons capabilities. The Zionists can't defend against a counterstrike.

And Iran has 35 times the area than the Zionists to absorb what can be thrown at them! With weapons production on their side that outstrips US ability by a wide margin.

This all adds up to a nuclear solution by the Zionists. What else can they do?

But then there's MAD??
 
Iran, with the aid of Russia and China, has developed the needed weapons capabilities.
Not anymore.......no one's lining up to give them defensive weapons that will be taken out in short order.
This all adds up to a nuclear solution by the Zionists. What else can they do?
Try again...............B 2s are hungry.
With weapons production on their side that outstrips US ability by a wide margin.
LOL.....................you the new Baghdad Bob?
And Iran has 35 times the area than the Zionists to absorb what can be thrown at them!
We do precision targeting..............area doesn't matter................GPS does....
The Zionists can't defend against a counterstrike.
Go ahead and try.
 
Defense against the evil Zionist regime is one good reason!

And what country in the world is safe from US aggression?

Iran now has what Iraq needed.

^^^Has some really good acid. Did he make it himself?
 
With the Nuclear threat being prohibitive for both sides now, it seems that modern warfare has become an issue of which side has established the better conventional weapons capability. That capability is not just in superior weapons, but also in the ability to produce those feared and fearsome weapons the most quickly.

Thus sits the Zionists' situation in limbo.

Does that now elevate the possibility of nuclear war?

My opinion is a resounding 'NO'!

An explanation can be provided.
 
Not anymore.......no one's lining up to give them defensive weapons that will be taken out in short order.
Iran produces their own most capable missiles and already has hundreds, if not thousands.
Try again...............B 2s are hungry.

LOL.....................you the new Baghdad Bob?
You're demonstrating a weakness in your talking points Dell.
We do precision targeting..............area doesn't matter................GPS does....
All the superpowers including Iran have precision targetting capabilities. No side is going to do much missing.
Go ahead and try.
The thing is Dell, the US can do tremendous damage to Iran, but the Zionist regime can't defend against what is thrown back. And as I've said, American bases and the US navy most likely can't defend either. This is the reason why Trump has to pretend that it's about the taxpayers' money. It's obviously not!

It's a fruitful discussion to discuss the possibilities!
 
They're outa cash.
China and Russia aren't and nobody will be fooled into thinking that the other big two doesn't have Iran's back.

Are you finished already Dell?

I mean, what else can be said other than sitting in our armchairs and telling each other that my daddy can beat up your daddy?
 
Iran produces their own most capable missiles and already has hundreds, if not thousands.
Had.
The thing is Dell, the US can do tremendous damage to Iran, but the Zionist regime can't defend against what is thrown back.
The 'Zionist regime' has Iran on it's knees, there's no dispute with that.
China and Russia aren't and nobody will be fooled into thinking that the other big two doesn't have Iran's back.
Putin is overextended in Ukraine, borrowing bullets and bodies . China is leery of involvement.
 

The F.B.I. Is Using Polygraphs to Test Officials’ Loyalty​

Typically, the F.B.I. has turned to polygraph tests to sniff out employees who might have betrayed their country or shown they cannot be trusted with secrets.

Since Kash Patel took office as the director of the F.B.I., the bureau has significantly stepped up the use of the lie-detector test, at times subjecting personnel to a question as specific as whether they have cast aspersions on Mr. Patel himself.

In interviews and polygraph tests, the F.B.I. has asked senior employees whether they have said anything negative about Mr. Patel, according to two people with knowledge of the questions and others familiar with similar accounts. In one instance, officials were forced to take a polygraph as the agency sought to determine who disclosed to the news media that Mr. Patel had demanded a service weapon, an unusual request given that he is not an agent. The number of officials asked to take a polygraph is in the dozens, several people familiar with the matter said, though it is unclear how many have specifically been asked about Mr. Patel.


Silly me, I thought the loyalty of FBI agents was to the country and the Constitution. Not a fatuous hack like Patel.
 
15th post
Silly me, I thought the loyalty of FBI agents was to the country and the Constitution. Not a fatuous hack like Patel.
Duh....

according to two people with knowledge of the questions and others familiar with similar accounts.
 
So who's on a party for America winning, and who's in the one looking for America to loose here???

~S~
 
So, if you make false claims while knowingly violate Civil Rights the law will be on your ass. Why would anyone object to that?
 
Back
Top Bottom