You need helpHe was convicted of fraud.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You need helpHe was convicted of fraud.
I understand it’s not how “sheep” comply with Fascism, independent thoughts are hard to generate from concrete between the ears…GWV5903, you are revealing your ignorance, so please go read up on the ruling.
100 %!So you claim Biden as president had no choice? What if Biden signed the agreement and then Trump was president and let the Taliban take over Afghanistan? Would you then blame Biden?
You are controlled by conspiracy nonsense, not independent thought.I understand it’s not how “sheep” comply with Fascism, independent thoughts are hard to generate from concrete between the ears…
You aren't a criminal if your conviction was by a bogus partisan jury.A fool and their money is soon parted. That is the reality of supporting a criminal like Trump. It is insanity.
Repeat that daily 6 times. Sooner or later you will understand.You are controlled by conspiracy nonsense, not independent thought.
It was a legit trial that will be easily upheld on appeal.You aren't a criminal if your conviction was by a bogus partisan jury.
Advice by Mr. Conspiracy himself.Repeat that daily 6 times. Sooner or later you will understand.
FraudYou need help
Were your parents Democrats?It was a legit trial that will be easily upheld on appeal.
If it happened to you, I definitely would also defend you. And I and millions of True Americans understand that the Trump Trials are all political and not criminal at all.Any sensible competently educated American knows that it was a good trial based on the facts.
I know that you can't argue the facts, Robert W.
Yet you couldn't argue why if your life depended on it.The term is fraud, it will not hold up under appeal
As if you know anything about the juries.You aren't a criminal if your conviction was by a bogus partisan jury.
The "why" would be if an appellate court was swayed by the fact that the law was never before used unless a defendant's actions caused a loss of money from the fraudulent valuations. A court could say that even Trump, who overvalued beyond common practice, had reason to expect his actions would be seen as violating the law.Yet you couldn't argue why if your life depended on it.
And the expert testimony was that banks lost millions in interest and insurance companies lost millions in premiums, due to his fraud.The "why" would be if an appellate court was swayed by the fact that the law was never before used unless a defendant's actions caused a loss of money from the fraudulent valuations.
Fuck that judge.Better hurry. He only has thirty days to put the cash or get a bond to appeal. I don't know of any nongovernment actor who has the ability or inclination to issue a bond for him.
Donald Trump faces potential "fire sale" of his prized business assets
Former White House counsel John Dean said authorities "will take more buildings than he could probably negotiate" if Trump refuses to pay $355M fine.www.newsweek.com