Stand with Trump; Fund the $355M Unjust Judgment

people like yourself, quick to call me, a NAZI.

------------------------------------------------------------------

?????
Ummm, I don't recall doing that.
If you can show me where that unruly avatar of mine has called you a "Nazi"....well, would you do so?
I will re-habilitate his sorry attitude in a New York minute.

However.....before I lays some lumber on him, woodja please show me where he called you a "Nazi"...whether you deserved it or not.

I'd hate to discipline that too-independent lackey without just cause.

Thanks in advance.
 
Zero. There were no sins dupe, just a political hit job, aka "Lawfare".

Lying on financial documents is not a sin?

Since when?

Or maybe you think Trumps really thought that their 10,000sq residence was 30,000? :rolleyes-41:
 
Lying on financial documents is not a sin? Since when?
Or maybe you think Trumps really thought that their 10,000sq residence was 30,000? :rolleyes-41:
Does the term Caveat Emptor" mean anything to you?
Banks who lend money know what collateral is worth.
No one lost money, there was no fraud, there was NEVER a $400,000,000 penalty when no one lost a dime.
Banks made $millions, walked away happy.

Letitia James ran on "getting Trump". This is a political hit job, aka "Lawfare".
 
Calculated from fines and ill-gotten gains.

The money is going to the state of New York, right? If it’s not about back taxes, and only about him getting better interest rates, then why isn’t the money going to the banks? If he didn’t defraud the state of New York, how do they get to lay claim to that money? Ok, if he has to pay a fine… great, $355 million in fines? Sounds fishy to me.
 
The money is going to the state of New York, right? If it’s not about back taxes, and only about him getting better interest rates, then why isn’t the money going to the banks? If he didn’t defraud the state of New York, how do they get to lay claim to that money? Ok, if he has to pay a fine… great, $355 million in fines? Sounds fishy to me.
Am I supposed to read the code of law of the State of New York and regurgitate it to you, so you can gish gallop to another round of bad faith sealioning?

I think not.
 
Am I supposed to read the code of law of the State of New York and regurgitate it to you, so you can gish gallop to another round of bad faith sealioning?

I think not.
I don’t expect you to do anything. I’m just giving my opinion. You can take it, or leave it, or whatever you want.
 
I don’t expect you to do anything. I’m just giving my opinion. You can take it, or leave it, or whatever you want.
No, you're just asking bad faith questions, not giving opinions. I see you are also willing to lie, when convenient.
 
No, you're just asking bad faith questions, not giving opinions. I see you are also willing to lie, when convenient.

I haven’t lied yet, you can’t show it. Yes, I ask questions, not in bad faith. You, like many other lefty’s here, have this narrative in your mind about what you think everyone else does. And that is the only narrative you’ll believe.

Even if someone tells you 1000 times, you’re going to believe what you want anyway.
 
I just quoted it. Yu asked a stream of sealion questions. Then said you were just stating opinions.

This is just another derail attempt. Yawn
Both can exist simultaneously ya know, one can ask questions and offer opinions on things. None of it is in bad faith and none of it is lying.
 
lol, you act as if you’re bored of the discussion, you realize, nobody is twisting your arm to discuss this with me, if you don’t like what I have to say, then just don’t respond lol
 
He'd have to send me a chunk of money to vote for him.
 
You used a word not understood by the loyal Democrats.
Qualify. How do lenders qualify customers. Well I spent years owning a mortgage firm in CA so I know precisely how they qualify them. Do they trust customers?

Not one bit. So who do they trust? When borrowers fill out loan applications as I have had many of them do, the forms dictate the questions. The Forms are standard and no lender has sway over the forms. They are requirements. The Forms ask financial details. Where do you work? What is your income? What are your bank accounts? We verify all of that. We never trusted any customer.

So this charade against Trump is a farce. It does not rely on lenders. Lenders get ignored by the court. What lender can you name that showed up at Fanni's court to claim they lost money? None of them showed up. And the farce in NY state, same thing so now you know Lenders do not trust customers at all.
Really stupid post. Really stupid.
Had a customer of yours defaulted and you found he was given the loan based on lies you would not sue?
Of course you would have.

No one would ever tell the truth if their were never any consequences. Your customers had to sign that the info they supplied you was honest.
You did not verify THEIR BOOKS. You used their swore statements to make your determination of their loan worthiness. A very differant thing.

What is with you people?
How can their be so many conspiracies all against the same person?
From every, dem or rep charged with dealing with facts.

Good God.
Get out of that cult.
It like a stupid pill they make you swallow daily.
 
Back
Top Bottom