Special Counsel Jack Smith has withdrawn his case

[Marener]

Of boxes…so? Not sure what boxes…was trump moving them in the videos?

People move boxes all the time. What the illegally appointed Jack Smith couldn’t do is prove there was a crime

Rational people would have a hard time accepting that removing dozens of boxes from the room the day before his attorney searched through them is a coincidence.

 

[struth]

Rational people would have a hard time accepting that removing dozens of boxes from the room the day before his attorney searched through them is a coincidence.

Is trump on video moving boxes? Link to this video

 

[DigitalDrifter]

I've always understood, that an ex-president cannot keep documents in private, that they themselves 'created'. It's always to me sounded like, there's a gray area with at least some other type of documents that they did not create.

 

[Marener]

Is trump on video moving boxes? Link to this video

There's a text message from Nauta to a Trump family member indicating Trump told him to move the boxes into his residence.

It would be absurd to think Nauta was moving the boxes to Trump's rooms without being instructed to do so.

And there's also the matter of Trump trying to get the security footage deleted after the received the subpoena for it. The boss wanted it deleted, after all.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Frankenstein

Trump wasn't charged with taking the classified documents.

You know that right?

WW

Your point?

 

[struth]

There's a text message from Nauta to a Trump family member indicating Trump told him to move the boxes into his residence.

It would be absurd to think Nauta was moving the boxes to Trump's rooms without being instructed to do so.

And there's also the matter of Trump trying to get the security footage deleted after the received the subpoena for it. The boss wanted it deleted, after all.

Which family member? What does it say? Link


Did he move the right boxes? What purpose?

There wasn’t a sun for the security footage

 

[Marener]

Which family member? What does it say? Link


Did he move the right boxes? What purpose?

There wasn’t a sun for the security footage

There was a subpoena for the security footage, after which Trump talked with Nauta and Nauta went on his little mission to get it deleted.

Seems that the boss had a reason for wanting the security footage deleted, since he knew that he moved the boxes immediately before his attorney did the search.

You’d have to be pretty delusional to not be able to figure this one out.

 

[struth]

There was a subpoena for the security footage, after which Trump talked with Nauta and Nauta went on his little mission to get it deleted.

Seems that the boss had a reason for wanting the security footage deleted, since he knew that he moved the boxes immediately before his attorney did the search.

You’d have to be pretty delusional to not be able to figure this one out.

Maybe he just didn’t want the govt to see what he does in his house? Like images of his wife walking around or kid

You seem to be repeating a lot of the unproven allegations of the illegally appointed Jack smith

 

[Marener]

Maybe he just didn’t want the govt to see what he does in his house? Like images of his wife walking around or kid

You seem to be repeating a lot of the unproven allegations of the illegally appointed Jack smith

He sent Nauta to look exactly where the cameras were in the hallway outside the closet that he stored the illegally held documents and the boss wanted ALL the footage deleted. Not just the footage of specific cameras on specific days.

AFTER he knew that received a subpoena for the footage.

You have to be pretty deranged to think this is all just innocent coincidence.

 

[SeaMajor7]

18 freaking pages, and the horse is still DEAD.

 

[struth]

He sent Nauta to look exactly where the cameras were in the hallway outside the closet that he stored the illegally held documents and the boss wanted ALL the footage deleted. Not just the footage of specific cameras on specific days.

AFTER he knew that received a subpoena for the footage.

You have to be pretty deranged to think this is all just innocent coincidence.

oh all of it, not just the days of the alleged move? Well, maybe he needed room on the server....there are a lot of cameras and that's a big place

 

[Marener]

oh all of it, not just the days of the alleged move? Well, maybe he needed room on the server....there are a lot of cameras and that's a big place

You want people to believe Trump was concerned about the free space on the server storing footage of Nauta bringing him boxes containing classified documents?

Are you stupid or just delusional?

 

[struth]

You want people to believe Trump was concerned about the free space on the server storing footage of Nauta bringing him boxes containing classified documents?

Are you stupid or just delusional?

I have no problem with the President reviewing boxes to determine if they are personal or not.

 

[Marener]

I have no problem with the President reviewing boxes to determine if they are personal or not.

Do you have a problem with him attempting to destroy evidence in an investigation?

Boss wants that video deleted after all.

 

[struth]

Do you have a problem with him attempting to destroy evidence in an investigation?

Boss wants that video deleted after all.

Haha since when did the party of clinton care about destroying evidence?

I have no problem with a business or property owner updating their security systems

 

[Marener]

Haha since when did the party of clinton care about destroying evidence?

I have no problem with a business or property owner updating their security systems

Sure! Unlike your conspiracy theories about Clinton, there’s actual evidence that Trump tried to delete that footage.

 

[struth]

Sure! Unlike your conspiracy theories about Clinton, there’s actual evidence that Trump tried to delete that footage.

You have evidence the President reviewed documents to see if they were personal, and boxes being moved...

Clinton actually used bleachbit to destroy evidence and had people use a hammer to destroy phones. This isn't a conspircy, this is fact.

The 12 juiciest bits from the FBI's Clinton report

From smashing phones to Colin Powell's warning to 'be very careful,' here are the most revealing portions of the FBI's investigation notes.

www.politico.com

FBI: Clinton staff destroyed devices with hammers

 

[Marener]

You have evidence the President reviewed documents to see if they were personal, and boxes being moved...

We have evidence that Trump was hiding documents that he needed to turn over to the government. We have evidence he tried to delete security footage showing this process.

This is all highly illegal.

Clinton actually used bleachbit to destroy evidence and had people use a hammer to destroy phones. This isn't a conspircy, this is fact.

Clinton didn’t use bleachbit. Destroying phones isn’t a crime. You don’t have facts that demonstrate any crimes by Clinton.

 

[struth]

We have evidence that Trump was hiding documents that he needed to turn over to the government. We have evidence he tried to delete security footage showing this process.

This is all highly illegal.

Clinton didn’t use bleachbit. Destroying phones isn’t a crime. You don’t have facts that demonstrate any crimes by Clinton.

The FBI said she did. Why can't you accept the results of investigations?

There are perfectly legal, and logical reasons for what you are saying trump did. Moving boxes is not a crime, reviewing documents isn't a crime. He didn't hide or destroy anything.

Clinton did destroy evidence

 

[Marener]

The FBI said she did. Why can't you accept the results of investigations?

Show me where the FBI said she did. You can’t and you won’t.

There are perfectly legal, and logical reasons for what you are saying trump did. Moving boxes is not a crime, reviewing documents isn't a crime. He didn't hide or destroy anything.

Moving boxes to hide documents from the government is a crime when you are legally required to turn those documents over. Moving those boxes out of the closet prevented his lawyers from searching through them and resulted in a lie stating that a thorough search had been accomplished.

Attempting to destroy evidence, the security footage, is likewise a crime. It doesn’t have to be successful.

Clinton did destroy evidence

You haven’t provided the facts to show this.