There was both! Haha what are you talking about??Since there was no subpoena or investigation, destroying those cell phones isn’t a crime.
Swing and a miss.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There was both! Haha what are you talking about??Since there was no subpoena or investigation, destroying those cell phones isn’t a crime.
Swing and a miss.
You sure? Tell me what day the phones were destroyed.There was both! Haha what are you talking about??
Yes she was under investigation hence why the fbi did the report…just manYou sure? Tell me what day the phones were destroyed.
You didn’t answer the question. When were the phones smashed.Yes she was under investigation hence why the fbi did the report…just man
Of course you do. She had no right to destroy govt documents and classified material. She had a duty to turn it over, even if it was on a private deviceYou didn’t answer the question. When were the phones smashed.
Because unless you can show me the phones were smashed while she was under investigation, then you have no crime.
When were the phones smashed? Until you can answer that, there is no crime.Of course you do. She had no right to destroy govt documents and classified material. She had a duty to turn it over, even if it was on a private device
She had her henchmen destroy the evidence because she couldn’t turn it over with out getting caught
As highlighted that’s not correctWhen were the phones smashed? Until you can answer that, there is no crime.
You didnt tell us when the phones were smashed.As highlighted that’s not correct
Keep trying though
I quoted you.didn’t ask you.
You never figured out when those phones were smashed, did you.As highlighted that’s not correct
Keep trying though
I quoted you.
" Who says it's illegal?"
The law says it is.
No. It was another brainless libtars “answer” from you because you’re too vapid to recognize your own mistakes.You gotta admit, it was a pretty silly question, on your part.
Great! Progress!
What’s the evidence that she directed someone to bleachbit the server?
Is there any?
Because we have evidence that Trump directed his cronies to delete the footage and hide the boxes.
Again, is there any evidence that Clinton ordered anyone to use bleachbit on the server?August 2015 Hillary Clinton was asked, "Did you wipe your email server?" and she evasively replied, "Like with a cloth or something?" A year later we found out that "cloth" was BleachBit, a software application that deletes information "so even God can't read it," as Congressman Trey Gowdy announced August 2016.Cloth or Something | BleachBit
www.bleachbit.org
The presidential records act, written in response to Richard Nixon's presidential records, made it clear, that the President does NOT retain ownership of his papers once he leaves office.As I grasp your failed attempt at communication, you seem to be claiming that some law makes it illegal for a President to retain his own records. Of course, if you’re attempting to allude to the Presidential Records Act, you’re quite wrong and unable to support your premise.
Can vice presidents steal classified documents?Expresidents are not authorized to steal classified materials.
As in this case, WP Is generally put on records to say that my position is that I'm right and you're wrong despite me withdrawing the case. It just means if the documents are used at a later date and if you didn't put WP on, it makes it difficult for you to prove you were right. Know what I mean?Wasn’t it withdrawn “without prejudice “ meaning it could be reinstated after his term ended? Or did that not happen?
What did I lie about? The phones were destroyed, the hard drives were scrap with bleachbit.You never figured out when those phones were smashed, did you.
Bummer.
Turns out you lied.
You claimed she wiped the hard drives. That was a lie.What did I lie about? The phones were destroyed, the hard drives were scrap with bleachbit.
She was destroying evidence.
that is what bleachbit does.You claimed she wiped the hard drives. That was a lie.
You claimed that the phones were destroyed while she was under investigation. That was a lie.
Because these two statements are untrue, there is no crime.
www.denverpost.com
The lie isn’t that the servers were wiped.that is what bleachbit does.
![]()
FBI report: Platte River Network employee used BleachBit to delete old Clinton e-mails
The FBI released documents on Friday from its investigation into whether former secretary of state Hillary Clinton improperly stored or transmitted classified e-mail.www.denverpost.com
![]()
Clinton's use of BleachBit avoided 'money trail' in email destruction
Hillary Clinton's decision to use BleachBit to scrub her private email server could have been based on the fact that the free software can be downloadedwww.washingtonexaminer.com
Hillary Clinton’s decision to use BleachBit to scrub her private email server could have been based on the fact that the free software can be downloaded and used with complete anonymity, the program’s developer said.
Andrew Ziem, the creator of BleachBit, pointed to a recent CNN report about his software in which a computer security expert had speculated that Clinton’s team would have selected a more expensive, more sophisticated service if it truly sought to conceal records.
“While there may be some merit to that, there is also an argument to be made for hoping that this doesn’t leave a money trail,” Ziem told the Washington Examiner.
Ziem said he was not aware Clinton had applied BleachBit to her server until Rep. Trey Gowdy said so on Fox News Thursday, because downloads of the program are anonymous and untraceable.
Gowdy said Clinton’s emails had been so thoroughly scrubbed that “even God can’t read them.”
“It seems probable that the intent was to erase information,” Ziem said of Clinton’s use of BleachBit.
The open-source software can also be used to clear space on a computer with a cluttered memory, the BleachBit creator said.
But in a post on his website Saturday, Ziem noted the program is an effective way to delete emails beyond recovery short of the “physical destruction” of servers with “a hammer or blow torch.”