Special Counsel Jack Smith has withdrawn his case

Since there was no subpoena or investigation, destroying those cell phones isn’t a crime.

Swing and a miss.
There was both! Haha what are you talking about??
 
Yes she was under investigation hence why the fbi did the report…just man
You didn’t answer the question. When were the phones smashed.

Because unless you can show me the phones were smashed while she was under investigation, then you have no crime.
 
You didn’t answer the question. When were the phones smashed.

Because unless you can show me the phones were smashed while she was under investigation, then you have no crime.
Of course you do. She had no right to destroy govt documents and classified material. She had a duty to turn it over, even if it was on a private device

She had her henchmen destroy the evidence because she couldn’t turn it over with out getting caught
 
Of course you do. She had no right to destroy govt documents and classified material. She had a duty to turn it over, even if it was on a private device

She had her henchmen destroy the evidence because she couldn’t turn it over with out getting caught
When were the phones smashed? Until you can answer that, there is no crime.
 
As highlighted that’s not correct

Keep trying though
You never figured out when those phones were smashed, did you.

Bummer.

Turns out you lied.
 
I quoted you.

" Who says it's illegal?"

The law says it is.

The law says many things are illegal. So, you’ll have to be more specific.

As I grasp your failed attempt at communication, you seem to be claiming that some law makes it illegal for a President to retain his own records. Of course, if you’re attempting to allude to the Presidential Records Act, you’re quite wrong and unable to support your premise.
You gotta admit, it was a pretty silly question, on your part.
No. It was another brainless libtars “answer” from you because you’re too vapid to recognize your own mistakes.
 
Great! Progress!

What’s the evidence that she directed someone to bleachbit the server?

Is there any?

Because we have evidence that Trump directed his cronies to delete the footage and hide the boxes.
August 2015 Hillary Clinton was asked, "Did you wipe your email server?" and she evasively replied, "Like with a cloth or something?" A year later we found out that "cloth" was BleachBit, a software application that deletes information "so even God can't read it," as Congressman Trey Gowdy announced August 2016.
 
August 2015 Hillary Clinton was asked, "Did you wipe your email server?" and she evasively replied, "Like with a cloth or something?" A year later we found out that "cloth" was BleachBit, a software application that deletes information "so even God can't read it," as Congressman Trey Gowdy announced August 2016.
Again, is there any evidence that Clinton ordered anyone to use bleachbit on the server?

I’ll cut to the chase.

The answer is no. The FBI interviewed the person who did it and he said she did not.

So case closed. No evidence to prosecute Clinton for this crime.
 
As I grasp your failed attempt at communication, you seem to be claiming that some law makes it illegal for a President to retain his own records. Of course, if you’re attempting to allude to the Presidential Records Act, you’re quite wrong and unable to support your premise.
The presidential records act, written in response to Richard Nixon's presidential records, made it clear, that the President does NOT retain ownership of his papers once he leaves office.
At that point, all his presidential papers become the property of the US Government (National Archives)

Presidential records created on or after January 20, 1981, are subject to the requirements of the Presidential Records Act (PRA; 44 U.S.C. §§2201-2209) and are the property of the United States. Under the law, “The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter”(44 U.S.C. §2202). For more information on the PRA, see CRS Report R46129, The Presidential Records Act: An Overview, by Meghan M. Stuessy.

Unlike historical presidencies, at the conclusion of a presidency under the PRA, the responsibility for the custody, control, preservation, and access to presidential records shifts to the Archivist (44 U.S.C. §2208).
 
Wasn’t it withdrawn “without prejudice “ meaning it could be reinstated after his term ended? Or did that not happen?
As in this case, WP Is generally put on records to say that my position is that I'm right and you're wrong despite me withdrawing the case. It just means if the documents are used at a later date and if you didn't put WP on, it makes it difficult for you to prove you were right. Know what I mean?

So imo, they'll just wait until after Trump leaves office and then it'll kick off again in court. So it boils down to what Trump can or can't do in office to delete the whole case.
 
15th post
You never figured out when those phones were smashed, did you.

Bummer.

Turns out you lied.
What did I lie about? The phones were destroyed, the hard drives were scrap with bleachbit.

She was destroying evidence.
 
What did I lie about? The phones were destroyed, the hard drives were scrap with bleachbit.

She was destroying evidence.
You claimed she wiped the hard drives. That was a lie.

You claimed that the phones were destroyed while she was under investigation. That was a lie.

Because these two statements are untrue, there is no crime.
 
You claimed she wiped the hard drives. That was a lie.

You claimed that the phones were destroyed while she was under investigation. That was a lie.

Because these two statements are untrue, there is no crime.
that is what bleachbit does.




Hillary Clinton’s decision to use BleachBit to scrub her private email server could have been based on the fact that the free software can be downloaded and used with complete anonymity, the program’s developer said.

Andrew Ziem, the creator of BleachBit, pointed to a recent CNN report about his software in which a computer security expert had speculated that Clinton’s team would have selected a more expensive, more sophisticated service if it truly sought to conceal records.

“While there may be some merit to that, there is also an argument to be made for hoping that this doesn’t leave a money trail,” Ziem told the Washington Examiner.

Ziem said he was not aware Clinton had applied BleachBit to her server until Rep. Trey Gowdy said so on Fox News Thursday, because downloads of the program are anonymous and untraceable.

Gowdy said Clinton’s emails had been so thoroughly scrubbed that “even God can’t read them.”

“It seems probable that the intent was to erase information,” Ziem said of Clinton’s use of BleachBit.

The open-source software can also be used to clear space on a computer with a cluttered memory, the BleachBit creator said.

But in a post on his website Saturday, Ziem noted the program is an effective way to delete emails beyond recovery short of the “physical destruction” of servers with “a hammer or blow torch.”
 
that is what bleachbit does.




Hillary Clinton’s decision to use BleachBit to scrub her private email server could have been based on the fact that the free software can be downloaded and used with complete anonymity, the program’s developer said.

Andrew Ziem, the creator of BleachBit, pointed to a recent CNN report about his software in which a computer security expert had speculated that Clinton’s team would have selected a more expensive, more sophisticated service if it truly sought to conceal records.

“While there may be some merit to that, there is also an argument to be made for hoping that this doesn’t leave a money trail,” Ziem told the Washington Examiner.

Ziem said he was not aware Clinton had applied BleachBit to her server until Rep. Trey Gowdy said so on Fox News Thursday, because downloads of the program are anonymous and untraceable.

Gowdy said Clinton’s emails had been so thoroughly scrubbed that “even God can’t read them.”

“It seems probable that the intent was to erase information,” Ziem said of Clinton’s use of BleachBit.

The open-source software can also be used to clear space on a computer with a cluttered memory, the BleachBit creator said.

But in a post on his website Saturday, Ziem noted the program is an effective way to delete emails beyond recovery short of the “physical destruction” of servers with “a hammer or blow torch.”
The lie isn’t that the servers were wiped.

The lie is that you said Clinton wiped the servers.

The FBI determined it was someone else.
 
Back
Top Bottom