Special Counsel Jack Smith has withdrawn his case

[BackAgain]

False.

An expresident illegally retaining classified materials and violating several other laws along the way are not official acts.

Who says it was illegal? You?

Lol.

 

[Blisterfinger]

As I said, the only jury that has spoken in a criminal case was in May.

The jury verdict was guilty.

WW

Are you like moving the goal posts because we were talking about the Smith case that has been dropped. Which case are you talking about now? Do you even know what's going on? Don't step on anybody on the way to the sink to clean your hands.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Who says it was illegal?

The law.

Still haven't read the indictments? You should. They actually list the specific laws broken.

Just for you.

 

[BackAgain]

The law.

Still haven't read the indictments? You should. They actually list the specific laws broken.

Just for you.

No. I read them. Unlike you, I understood them.

 

[Marener]

He sure was immune. That’s why they got dropped.

He’s not immune for actions taken after leaving office since he no longer has any official position or capacity as president.

So no, that’s not why it was dropped. It was dropped merely because he is becoming president and presidents cannot be criminally prosecuted by the DoJ.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

No. I read them. Unlike you, I understood them.

Clearly not, because you're on a message board asking strangers what laws were listed in them.

 

[BackAgain]

Clearly not, because you're on a message board asking strangers what laws were listed in them.

No. I asked no such question.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

No. I asked no such question.

Who says it was illegal?

The law.

The codes are in the indictment.

 

[elektra]

Sure we can. It is all documented fact.

Yet you just failed to prove it

 

[toobfreak]

Special Counsel Jack Smith has withdrawn his case​

The case was a flim flam.
Smith is a bum.
So why should this card have the right to release his bogus case summary to the public???

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The case was a flim flam.

The case was a slam dunk. Trump has reduced you guys to gaslighting yourselves.

And it is hilarious.

 

[struth]

I did post something from the court. From the freaking court docket on the case. All the documents listed here are "court documents".

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67490070/united-states-v-trump/

WW

Those are things filed with the court. Accusations written by the illegally appointed Jack smith.

There are things written by the court, ie that Jack smith was illegally appointed

 

[struth]

View attachment 1062822

https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/documenttools/379903d5e1fcc18e/48ab6e69-full.pdf

Trump was charged with 18 USC 1001 because he caused his attorney to lie to the government. Trump had removed dozens of boxes from the storage room before he allowed his attorney to do the search, preventing him from finding and returning the documents.

I get those were the accusations made by the illegally appointed Jack smith

But the evidence doesn’t support that.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I get those were the accusations made by the illegally appointed Jack smith

Actually, those were the criminal charges handed down by a grand jury, based on evidence presented to them.

Get a grip on reality.

 

[Marener]

I get those were the accusations made by the illegally appointed Jack smith

But the evidence doesn’t support that.

The fact is they found many documents with classified markings when they executed the search warrant.

So the evidence sure does support it.

 

[BackAgain]

The law.

The codes are in the indictment.

I didn’t ask you. Why would I ask?

As I told you, I read everything long ago.

What I told you was that the Government had no jurisdiction.

I’m guessing that you misunderstand the various notions (that’s plural, kid) of “jurisdiction.” Typical you. Ignorant and presumptuous.

 

[struth]

Actually, those were the criminal charges handed down by a grand jury, based on evidence presented to them.

Get a grip on reality.

A charge is an accusation, what was presented to them by the illegally appointed Jack smith

 

[struth]

The fact is they found many documents with classified markings when they executed the search warrant.

So the evidence sure does support it.

That doesn’t support that trump took boxes and hide them from his attorney as you claimed

In fact he’s innocent until proven otherwise and the xiden admin couldn’t prove that

 

[Marener]

That doesn’t support that trump took boxes and hide them from his attorney as you claimed

In fact he’s innocent until proven otherwise and the xiden admin couldn’t prove that

The surveillance video shows the removal of the boxes.

 

[struth]

The surveillance video shows the removal of the boxes.

Of boxes…so? Not sure what boxes…was trump moving them in the videos?

People move boxes all the time. What the illegally appointed Jack Smith couldn’t do is prove there was a crime