Soy Bean Farmers.....What is NEXT?

Soy Beans.
China participation, meaning BUYING the USA farmers Soy Beans.

I heard it was ZERO, which is 0%, Has China actually purchased ANY of our Farmers Soy Beans?






This is why we have a crop insurance program that nearly a century old. It’s amazing how little you dembots know about our country
 
Lol. So you pay for all of it. Enjoy them beans!!
Yes we have for centuries. Crop insurance is a great thing and one of the things are founders thought the govt should be involved it

Your ignorance is amazing on this topic
 
Yes we have for centuries. Crop insurance is a great thing and one of the things are founders thought the govt should be involved it

ance is amazing on this topic
Farming is a risky game. Insurance is for acts of god not stupidity of the President. Enjoy them beans.
 
This is why we have a crop insurance program that nearly a century old. It’s amazing how little you dembots know about our country
Crop insurance does not cover situations where you:

  • Can harvest a full crop but cannot sell it because of tariffs, embargoes, market disruptions, logistics issues, or buyer loss.
  • Experience price declines due to trade policies, demand changes, or foreign retaliation (like China’s tariffs on soybeans).
Those are considered market risks, not insurable “perils.”

Who's the dumbass now struth ?


Yes we have for centuries. Crop insurance is a great thing and one of the things are founders thought the govt should be involved it

Your ignorance is amazing on this topic
Don't you feel foolish now, or do you have some amazing Kelly Conway type of Spin and 'Alternative Facts.'
 
Crop insurance does not cover situations where you:

  • Can harvest a full crop but cannot sell it because of tariffs, embargoes, market disruptions, logistics issues, or buyer loss.
  • Experience price declines due to trade policies, demand changes, or foreign retaliation (like China’s tariffs on soybeans).
Those are considered market risks, not insurable “perils.”

Who's the dumbass now struth ?



Don't you feel foolish now, or do you have some amazing Kelly Conway type of Spin and 'Alternative Facts.'
Wrong, federal insurance pays for farmers imparted by foreign retaliatory tariffs

Educate yourself

We had a record farm bankruptes under xiden in 2024 and this was discussed

 
As they have for crop insurance for decades, the current law was a new deal, fdr law, but the concept goes back to Washington and Jefferson

Even your own link says..........Market Facilitation Program.
Unrelated to Crop insurance.

Yes — the Market Facilitation Program (MFP) is completely separate from crop insurance, and it served a very different purpose.
Here’s how it works and how it differs:


🌾 What the Market Facilitation Program (MFP) Was

The Market Facilitation Program was a temporary federal aid program created by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) in 2018 and 2019 under the Trade Mitigation Program.
Purpose:
To compensate farmers for lost export sales and lower prices caused by foreign retaliatory tariffs, mainly during the U.S.–China trade war.
When countries like China, Canada, Mexico, and the EU imposed tariffs on U.S. farm goods (soybeans, pork, dairy, etc.) in response to U.S. tariffs, U.S. farmers suddenly lost key markets. The MFP payments were intended to offset some of those losses.


💵 How MFP Worked

  • Administered by the USDA’s Farm Service Agency (FSA) (not the RMA).
  • Farmers applied for payments based on their actual production or acres planted of affected commodities.
  • Payment rates were set per commodity (e.g., dollars per bushel, per head of livestock, or per acre).
  • It was funded directly by the federal government, not by insurance premiums or claims.
Examples:
  • Soybean farmers received payments because China — the largest buyer — drastically cut purchases.
  • Pork producers received payments for reduced exports.
  • Payments varied by county depending on the degree of estimated tariff impact.

🚫 Not the Same as Crop Insurance

Here’s the key distinction:
FeatureCrop InsuranceMarket Facilitation Program (MFP)
Administered byUSDA Risk Management Agency (RMA)USDA Farm Service Agency (FSA)
Funded byFarmer premiums (partly subsidized by federal government)100% federal government payments
CoversYield and revenue losses from natural causes or market price changesTrade-war and tariff-related market losses
Permanent program?Yes, ongoing federal insurance frameworkNo, temporary (only 2018–2019)
Triggered byWeather, disease, or market price movementsGovernment action (tariffs, trade retaliation)

✅ In Summary

  • The Market Facilitation Program was emergency aid, not insurance.
  • It was separate from and unrelated to crop insurance.
  • Farmers could receive both: crop insurance payouts for natural losses and MFP payments for tariff-related losses — but they came from different USDA agencies and for different reasons.
 
Wrong, federal insurance pays for farmers imparted by foreign retaliatory tariffs

Educate yourself

We had a record farm bankruptes under xiden in 2024 and this was discussed

Is the MFP a form of a government bailout?

ChatGPT said:​

Yes — the Market Facilitation Program (MFP) is widely regarded as a form of government bailout for farmers, though the USDA didn’t use that term officially.

Here’s what that means in practical terms:


💬 Why It’s Considered a “Bailout”​

A bailout typically means government financial assistance given to a specific sector to prevent serious financial harm caused by forces outside its control.

That’s exactly what MFP was:

  • The U.S.–China trade war (and other retaliatory tariffs) caused massive export losses for U.S. farmers.
  • Farmers couldn’t control or predict those trade policies.
  • To stabilize the farm economy, the federal government made direct cash payments to offset lost income.
So while USDA described MFP as “trade mitigation,” economically it functioned as a bailout — temporary aid to prevent a collapse in farm income.


💵 The Scale of the Aid​

  • Between 2018 and 2019, MFP payments totaled roughly $23 billion.
  • For comparison, that’s larger than annual federal crop insurance subsidies and roughly a third of total U.S. farm income in those years.
  • The largest share went to soybean farmers, who were hit hardest by China’s tariffs.

⚖️ Political Framing​

  • Supporters said MFP was a fair response to help farmers caught in a government-created trade conflict.
  • Critics — including some economists and policymakers — said it was indeed a bailout, arguing it:
    • Disproportionately favored certain crops (like soybeans).
    • Wasn’t based on demonstrated losses per farmer.
    • Set a precedent for large ad hoc payments outside regular farm programs.

✅ In Short​

Yes — MFP was essentially a government bailout for farmers, created to cushion the blow from retaliatory tariffs during the 2018–2019 trade war.
It was a one-time, taxpayer-funded emergency program — not part of the normal safety net like crop insurance or commodity support programs.
 
Is the MFP a form of a government bailout?

ChatGPT said:​

Yes — the Market Facilitation Program (MFP) is widely regarded as a form of government bailout for farmers, though the USDA didn’t use that term officially.

Here’s what that means in practical terms:


💬 Why It’s Considered a “Bailout”​

A bailout typically means government financial assistance given to a specific sector to prevent serious financial harm caused by forces outside its control.

That’s exactly what MFP was:

  • The U.S.–China trade war (and other retaliatory tariffs) caused massive export losses for U.S. farmers.
  • Farmers couldn’t control or predict those trade policies.
  • To stabilize the farm economy, the federal government made direct cash payments to offset lost income.
So while USDA described MFP as “trade mitigation,” economically it functioned as a bailout — temporary aid to prevent a collapse in farm income.


💵 The Scale of the Aid​

  • Between 2018 and 2019, MFP payments totaled roughly $23 billion.
  • For comparison, that’s larger than annual federal crop insurance subsidies and roughly a third of total U.S. farm income in those years.
  • The largest share went to soybean farmers, who were hit hardest by China’s tariffs.

⚖️ Political Framing​

  • Supporters said MFP was a fair response to help farmers caught in a government-created trade conflict.
  • Critics — including some economists and policymakers — said it was indeed a bailout, arguing it:
    • Disproportionately favored certain crops (like soybeans).
    • Wasn’t based on demonstrated losses per farmer.
    • Set a precedent for large ad hoc payments outside regular farm programs.

✅ In Short​

Its more like a Failout.
 
15th post
As they have for crop insurance for decades,
A "Bailout" like MFP, is different than Crop Insurance.


So, answer this direct question.
Are you claiming that the farmers will be using their purchased "Crop Insurance" and the Insurance will pay the farmers because the farmers couldn't sell their crops because of trump's tariffs?

Don't spin it into something else.
Answer the question that was asked..... Yes or No.
 
Farming is a risky game. Insurance is for acts of god not stupidity of the President. Enjoy them beans.

Wrong, federal insurance pays for farmers imparted by foreign retaliatory tariffs

Educate yourself

We had a record farm bankruptes under xiden in 2024 and this was discussed

Where did struth go?

Is he out looking for backup to his ignorant posts?

"Fellow Trump Cult members........ I need some backup here, I'm getting destroyed and even though I, struth, am wrong, I need some help, can you (fellow Trump cult members) help me out and start calling these fact checkers LIARS and Ignorant."

Please Help..... struth
 
Where did struth go?

Is he out looking for backup to his ignorant posts?

"Fellow Trump Cult members........ I need some backup here, I'm getting destroyed and even though I, struth, am wrong, I need some help, can you (fellow Trump cult members) help me out and start calling these fact checkers LIARS and Ignorant."

Please Help..... struth
Trump wants to be FDR. Except he made the crisis.
 
The good news is…

….. …..Soy beans are edible,

….. ….. ….. Meaning sit been farmers won’t starve.

WW
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom