"The research also found that if interventions in the country could have been conducted one week, two weeks, or three weeks earlier, cases could have been reduced by 66 percent, 86 percent and 95 percent respectively – significantly limiting the geographical spread of the disease. However, if NPIs were conducted one week, two weeks, or three weeks later than they were, the number of cases may have shown a 3-fold, 7-fold, or 18-fold increase, respectively."
“Our study demonstrates how important it is for countries which are facing an imminent outbreak to proactively plan a coordinated response which swiftly tackles the spread of the disease on a number of fronts."
When this report came out we had very few cases, however anyone with at brain understood what it meant for us.
Furthermore we had 50 state responses not a comprehensive national one.
A study by the University of Southampton examining non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) in response to the new coronavirus (COVID-19) in China shows that a range of early, coordinated and targeted measures are needed to help significantly reduce its spread.
www.southampton.ac.uk
I request that you find a different country to make that claim on.
I don't believe China. The only time China is not lying, is when they are not saying anything.
This is a country that jailed the doctors who warned them about Covid-19 to begin with. They have complete control over the media, and there is non-government journalism at all.
This is like believing the child mortality rates in Cuba, when we know doctors simply refuse to report deaths because the government will fire them, and they'll end up sifting through garbage cans.
Or Venezuela claiming the unemployment rate is low, because 4 million people fled the country, so they are no longer counted as unemployed.
If you are going to trust the numbers from China, then you might as well assume everything Trump says is divine truth as well.
The reason I used that first early study from the UK on the efficacy of npi's is because the Rabid Right used it to bash China's response as having killed 95% more people that was necessary, if they had just started the npi's 3 weeks sooner. Obviously Trumpybears response was exponentially worse by any measure than China's.
Obviously I can't answer for whomever you mean by the "the rabid right".
I have no idea who you are talking about, or what the context was.
But regardless, I assume you understand that China and the US, have fundamental differences in law, ideology, and morals. Right?
We are nation built, at its fundamental core, on the idea of personal liberty, and inherently with that comes a limitation of the Federal Government.
China, obviously, does not hold those values. If they want to lock up a doctor, because he's saying they have an virus outbreak in progress, they can do that, and they did.
No one in China is complaining the government didn't do enough, not because they did everything right, but because if they, they'd be in jail. No one in China is contesting the numbers by the Chinese government, not because the numbers are perfect, but because if they did, they'd be in jail.
So there is two takeaways. 1, when a study comes out in the UK, by people who are not in China, have not been in China, have no data from China that didn't come from the Chinese government, I am naturally going to be skeptical.
2. Trump does not have the power to do everything. Again, fundamental difference between the US and China.
What cracks me up is, throughout this forum for the last 4 years, we've heard how Trump was going to be a Fascist, and a Dictator.
Then those very same people, spin right around and condemn him for NOT being a fascist dictator.
Remember, the Democrats were condemning Trump in March, saying that his Travel Bans were racist.
(RNS) — This week the Democrat-controlled House is scheduled to vote on the NO BAN Act, even as the White House argues that the bill could impede the government’s ability to respond to the coronavirus pandemic.
religionnews.com
(RNS) — House Democrats are pushing for the passage of a bill rescinding President Donald Trump’s controversial travel ban, even as Republican House leaders and the White House argue the bill could impede the government’s ability to respond to the coronavirus pandemic.
And here you are now, saying Trump didn't do enough?
The Democrats resisted every attempt by Trump to respond to the Covid-19, and here you are complaining he didn't do enough?
This is ironic to no end. You complain he is a dictator, and then complain he didn't do enough dictations.