A Socialist system of production is not run on capital.
Are there not other systems of production not run on capital?
Capital is that which oppresses.
How?
hat is why underdeveloped countries that claim to be communist become dictatorships. All the capital is placed in the hands of the State.
Which is the definition of Socialism. Communism is a stateless existence where the community owns the means of production (which can never last and will revert to Socialism every time).
Are there not other systems of production not run on capital?
I think not, but I could be wrong.
How?
Whoever controls capital has advantage over everyone else. If you have the capital invested in the media you have power over everyone's mental production. If you have capital to invest in Washington you have power over the political sphere. This is easy, it should be evident.
Which is the definition of Socialism. Communism is a stateless existence where the community owns the means of production (which can never last and will revert to Socialism every time).
Its the definition promoted by the people with the capital invested in printing dictionaries. It's not how I would define it. But I don't let others dictate what I think. I think for myself.