So if God didn't create evil, why does God allow evil to exist?

[Taz]

I never said that, I credit him for both good and bad, I just want to know why the bad? And so much of it?

And I want to know what your standard of measure is.

Sometimes I use the metric system, but mostly not.

Funny but not unexpected.

You won’t accept that God exists because the world is imperfect. That is insane.

Quote where I said that. I'll wait.

By your refusal to state your standard of acceptable.

You are always going to bitch about something.

It's not about bitchin', it's about knowing WHY god put so much bad stuff here.

 

[Taz]

And I want to know what your standard of measure is.

Sometimes I use the metric system, but mostly not.

Funny but not unexpected.

You won’t accept that God exists because the world is imperfect. That is insane.

Quote where I said that. I'll wait.

By your refusal to state your standard of acceptable.

You are always going to bitch about something.

The funny thing is, when atheists like him point out that there is evil in this world, they are inadvertently acknowledging that an objective moral standard exists. They can’t have it both ways, if they say morality is subjective, then nothing is evil. But if they claim evil exists, then they have no leg to stand on without any objective standard that everything else is measured against.

And the funnier thing is, most of them don’t even realize their dilemma.

Just because I'm agnostic doesn't mean that I don't have moral standards. Which, btw, aren't set by religion but by society.

 

[Taz]

I never said that, I credit him for both good and bad, I just want to know why the bad? And so much of it?

And I want to know what your standard of measure is.

Sometimes I use the metric system, but mostly not.

Funny but not unexpected.

You won’t accept that God exists because the world is imperfect. That is insane.

Quote where I said that. I'll wait.

It's the "logical" conclusion you are trying to reach but can't quite get to.

Is male pattern baldness evil too? I mean after all if you want a perfect world shouldn't everyone be blessed with a full head of hair.

Your god isn't logical.

 

[ding]

And I want to know what your standard of measure is.

Sometimes I use the metric system, but mostly not.

Funny but not unexpected.

You won’t accept that God exists because the world is imperfect. That is insane.

Quote where I said that. I'll wait.

It's the "logical" conclusion you are trying to reach but can't quite get to.

Is male pattern baldness evil too? I mean after all if you want a perfect world shouldn't everyone be blessed with a full head of hair.

Your god isn't logical.

I don't think you are a reliable authority on being logical.

It's the interpretations you choose that are illogical.

It's the conclusions you reach which are illogical.

It's your expectation that other people should argue from your position rather than from their position which is illogical.

 

[ding]

Sometimes I use the metric system, but mostly not.

Funny but not unexpected.

You won’t accept that God exists because the world is imperfect. That is insane.

Quote where I said that. I'll wait.

By your refusal to state your standard of acceptable.

You are always going to bitch about something.

The funny thing is, when atheists like him point out that there is evil in this world, they are inadvertently acknowledging that an objective moral standard exists. They can’t have it both ways, if they say morality is subjective, then nothing is evil. But if they claim evil exists, then they have no leg to stand on without any objective standard that everything else is measured against.

And the funnier thing is, most of them don’t even realize their dilemma.

Just because I'm agnostic doesn't mean that I don't have moral standards. Which, btw, aren't set by religion but by society.

You aren't agnostic and you know it. Quit blowing fartsmoke.

 

[ding]

And I want to know what your standard of measure is.

Sometimes I use the metric system, but mostly not.

Funny but not unexpected.

You won’t accept that God exists because the world is imperfect. That is insane.

Quote where I said that. I'll wait.

By your refusal to state your standard of acceptable.

You are always going to bitch about something.

It's not about bitchin', it's about knowing WHY god put so much bad stuff here.

Oh I can tell you are a complainer.

That's why you can't answer your own question.

 

[Taz]

Funny but not unexpected.

You won’t accept that God exists because the world is imperfect. That is insane.

Quote where I said that. I'll wait.

By your refusal to state your standard of acceptable.

You are always going to bitch about something.

The funny thing is, when atheists like him point out that there is evil in this world, they are inadvertently acknowledging that an objective moral standard exists. They can’t have it both ways, if they say morality is subjective, then nothing is evil. But if they claim evil exists, then they have no leg to stand on without any objective standard that everything else is measured against.

And the funnier thing is, most of them don’t even realize their dilemma.

Just because I'm agnostic doesn't mean that I don't have moral standards. Which, btw, aren't set by religion but by society.

You aren't agnostic and you know it. Quit blowing fartsmoke.

Copying me again, I’m flattered.

 

[Taz]

Sometimes I use the metric system, but mostly not.

Funny but not unexpected.

You won’t accept that God exists because the world is imperfect. That is insane.

Quote where I said that. I'll wait.

By your refusal to state your standard of acceptable.

You are always going to bitch about something.

It's not about bitchin', it's about knowing WHY god put so much bad stuff here.

Oh I can tell you are a complainer.

That's why you can't answer your own question.

Why would I ask a question if I already know the answer?

 

[ding]

Quote where I said that. I'll wait.

By your refusal to state your standard of acceptable.

You are always going to bitch about something.

The funny thing is, when atheists like him point out that there is evil in this world, they are inadvertently acknowledging that an objective moral standard exists. They can’t have it both ways, if they say morality is subjective, then nothing is evil. But if they claim evil exists, then they have no leg to stand on without any objective standard that everything else is measured against.

And the funnier thing is, most of them don’t even realize their dilemma.

Just because I'm agnostic doesn't mean that I don't have moral standards. Which, btw, aren't set by religion but by society.

You aren't agnostic and you know it. Quit blowing fartsmoke.

Copying me again, I’m flattered.

Yes, mudda.

 

[ding]

Funny but not unexpected.

You won’t accept that God exists because the world is imperfect. That is insane.

Quote where I said that. I'll wait.

By your refusal to state your standard of acceptable.

You are always going to bitch about something.

It's not about bitchin', it's about knowing WHY god put so much bad stuff here.

Oh I can tell you are a complainer.

That's why you can't answer your own question.

Why would I ask a question if I already know the answer?

Of course you won't answer them. That's because you build arguments that resemble what you want my beliefs to be rather than what my beliefs are.

Your answer to your straw men arguments would reveal you for what you are.

 

[ding]

Funny but not unexpected.

You won’t accept that God exists because the world is imperfect. That is insane.

Quote where I said that. I'll wait.

By your refusal to state your standard of acceptable.

You are always going to bitch about something.

It's not about bitchin', it's about knowing WHY god put so much bad stuff here.

Oh I can tell you are a complainer.

That's why you can't answer your own question.

Why would I ask a question if I already know the answer?

Go ahead and give it your best guess.