Billy_Bob
Diamond Member
End points are not averaged.. If we average the end point it disappears. The earth has been over 400ppm very often in data sets that have higher resolution.But the red spike at the far right goes off the chart for the first time, and the blue part is more bunched up closer to today, also for the first time. What exactly are you trying to prove?The earth is a cyclical system..I'm not sure how these separate details all plug in with GW, because taken as a whole, the temperature has been rising since the industrial revolution, and is predicted to keep on rising into the future.Does CO2's interaction with water vapor actually amplify or does it dampen? ERBE shows a dampening and thus no hot spot. With out this basic premise CAGW FAILS...So they're saying that 2/3 of the CO2 increase is from a feedback loop and amplification. Ya, so what? It means that the CO2 we put into the system amplifies itself to make it worse? Is that about right? Or did I get something wrong?I will provide a link again to the basics of Anthroprogenic Global Warming. Most of the facts are not in dispute. There is conjecture around the effect of CO2 in our atmosphere. The ERBE satellite data shows there is no hot spot and that the input/output balance is unchanged by adding more CO2.I back what I say with NASA. You peeps have nothing but more fake news.LOLIs this question supposed to prove that NASA is faking their data?Oh great, another clueless noob just in to say something inane.The IPCC garbage is hyperbole... Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.Man, what's it like to purposely choose to be ignorant, when you can read up on all the GW science out there on the internet.How so?That's simply trying to help people who are going through a personal crisis, but you'd need empathy for that, which Trump voters also don't have.Like the liberals who claim multiple genders?Why is it that everyone who voted for Donnie denies science?We just had an all time record snow for Oct and now cold weather for MN this week.
Until I see Palm Trees on the shores of Lake Superior I will be sceptical of this calamity of global warming.
Those Palms do start growing here, I will then believe the warming and celebrate with a Mai Tai on the beaches of Duluth.
You actually deny science.
I welcome the supposed warming. Still waiting for it to kick in. The climate has changed constantly for the planets entire history. That doesn't signify a world calamity. Species evolve or die out. That is nature and tough luck for some.
A scientist is supposed to be sceptical of supposed claims of consensus.
So when does your scientific consensus of the end of snow start? I am getting impatient with the yearly normal cold assed winters.
Taz, who can't answer the question, yet has the gall to insult a scientist working on his PHD over it.
Here is the tuff question Taz ignores....
Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.
It appears another leftist AGW believer failing to defend the ideology.
Answer the question fella, your dodging the question is boring.
I've given up on him.... He spouts crapola and has no science to back up his assertions..
The Skeptic's Case | Mises Institute
Every serious skeptical scientist has been consistently saying essentially the same thing for over 20 years, yet most people have never heard the message.mises.org
Again, even NASA has not answered the question of how and where their missing energy is..
View attachment 406494
View attachment 406523
Warming spikes are seen every time we begin a cooling cycle and we are over due...
Tell me what was happening in the years of 800 to 1300 and why the CO2 levels mirror todays levels?
Last edited: