Sink the Bastards!!!

[Spare_change]

Forget Halloween costumes and yoga, there’s a new symbol of cultural appropriation—the canoe.

According to Misao Dean, Professor of English at the University of Victoria, the canoe can be a symbol of colonialism, imperialism and genocide due to history. She also accused the canoers of cultural appropriation because they are primarily white men and have a privileged place in society.

In a radio interview for CBC Radio, which wasn’t picked by the Internet until several months later, she claimed “we have a whole set of narratives that make the canoe into a kind of morally untouchable symbol, something that seems natural, that seems ordinary, and seems to promote values that we ascribe to.”

“But I think if you look a little further that narrative obscures or erases another narrative—and that narrative is about, to be blunt, it’s about theft and genocide”, the professor said.

 

[PurpleOwl]

It's about a canada's obsession with canoeing and its place in canadian literature

The book opens with a personal memoir of Dean’s own inheritance of her father’s canoe paddle before giving way elsewhere in the introduction to other forms of and ideas about cultural inheritance. This moves into eight chapters, each with a distinctive theme. The first chapter draws on David Bentley’s notion of ‘uncannyda’, that is, the sense of having a link to the landscape but one that evokes ‘the other’ and results in ‘kinds of illusion or vertigo’ (p. 18). Engaging with a wide range of canoe literature, principally the work of Margaret Atwood, the discussion that follows draws the reader into the underlying postcolonial analysis, oftentimes most effectively. Chapter 2 moves from literature to historiography, this time leaning partially on the ideas of Hayden White. This chapter recalls to mind Ian McKay’s great work The Quest of the Folk: Antimodernism and Cultural Selection in Twentieth Century Nova Scotia (1994) and concludes in a similar kind of way, the ‘folk’ (in this instance, canoeists) obscuring wider conflicts. Chapters 3 and 4 dissect wilderness canoeing and canoe pageantry. Chapters 5 and 6 tease out the relationship between canoeing, ‘the north’ and ‘northernness’, and provide fulfilling engagement not only with the discrete matter of canoeing in the northern wilderness but also its place in constructing the idea of the north. Chapter 7 turns its critical attention to the Canadian Canoe Museum. This is the weakest chapter of the book. It feels a little out of place and, given the author has sacrificed a full conclusion, could certainly have been left out without harming the overall impact. Finally, chapter 8 turns back to the postcolonial theme that has bubbled under the surface throughout. Here the subject matter is turned on its head: rather than non-indigenous Canadians seeking to become indigenous, we have indigenous Canadians endeavouring to decolonise their own heritage.

Project MUSE - <i>Inheriting a Canoe Paddle: The Canoe in Discourses of English-Canadian Nationalism</i> by Misao Dean (review)

nobody is making fun of your tiny white penis

 

[blastoff]

Nice to know Canadian universities are as infested with lefty crackpots as ours.