Anybody ever watch a reality show where controlled demolitions bring down a building? There are literally weeks of preparation just to expose the areas so that the demolition engineers can see where to place the charges.
MUCH LOWER ESTIMATES HAVE BEEN GIVEN BY CONTROLLED DEMOLITION EXPERTS
Next there is another week or two while many, many holes are drilled in the concrete for the explosive charges. The incredible mass of wiring is carefully mapped out and attached to a computer for synchronized blasts. I guess the MTV generation who were raised in front of a TV set think that the CIA and/or the FBI or some rogue US government agency could pull it off right in front of some of the best security networks in the world and keep it a secret but it's a freaking pipe dream.
Experts from the CIA ,FBI aid Military intelligence disagree with you and they are far from the MTV generation
Why didn't it happen when the jihad tried it with a truck of explosives in the first year of the Clinton administration? It certainly would have been easier to synchronize timed explosives with a freaking truck parked in the basement than coordinate with two crazy squads of suicide bombers in planes. Nothing makes sense except wishful thinking
YOU MEAN THE FIRST FALSE FLAG ON THE TRADE CENTER ?
Well said. And irrefutably supported by the question of purpose. The only purpose of any controlled demolition is prevention of damage to the surrounding area. There is no other purpose. So the very notion of controlling the destruction of the Towers is wholly counterproductive to the intention of bringing them down.
WHY ? MAYBE THE GOAL WAS TO BRING DOWN THOSE THREE BUILDING AND MINIMIZE THE DAMAGE TO SURROUNDING INFRASTRUCTURE
u]Toppling[/u] the Towers, by blasting one side of their foundations with one truckful of Semtex properly positioned in each basement garage, would have been much easier and would have collapsed them horizontally onto a five block area of lower Manhattan, vastly increasing the level of damage caused by the vertical ("pancake") collapse.
REALLY YOU WORK OUT A FORMULA FOR TOPPLING BUILDING WITH A TRUCK BOMB HAVE YOU ?..LOL..GIVE ME A BREAK
So the notion of a controlled demolition is logically dismissed because it simply makes no sense.
YOU ARE DISMISSED BECAUSE YOU MAKE NO SENSE
Well, just to be even handed; a lot of the time taken in demolition prep is removal of components that they can sell.
That having been said there is zero chance that the buildings could be wired for demolition with nobody noticing.
SAYS WHO ?
Zero chance. Radio controlled demo wouldn't work. We know this because of the FDNY radios not working resulting in 343 deaths. Cables would have been seen easily. Not to mention the movement of furniture to place demolition charges, the cutting through pipe and utilities. All couldn't have happened. The suggestion is comical to be kind.
FDYN RADIOS NOT WORKING IS COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT TO A WIRELESS DETONATION SYSTEMS
Next the "planning" that would go into something like this would not get past the smell test. The largest building ever demoed was something like 400 feet tall in Cleveland; prep took months. We're supposed to believe that the planners not only wired the 2 buildings (or 3 if you want to count in WTC 7) but would stake the plan hinging on covertly demoing 3 buildings larger than any other demo job ever done.
YES,SO THEY VERY WELL MAY HAVE USED NEW TECHNOLOGY THAT HAD NOT PREVIOUSLY UTILIZED IN BUILDING DEMO
Anyone who thinks this is disqualified from being taken seriously; they should be disqualified from operating vehicles or procreating as well
AN EXAMINATION OF THOSE WHO HAVE SIGNED OF THE 9/11 PETITION AND THE CALIBER OF PEOPLE INVOLVED MAKES YOUR STATEMENT RIDICULOUS
