Simple question for the right wing ,how whould you stop refugees from coming across our border.

[jbander]

The migrants are just using the asylum angle to get past our standard border laws. We need to define what they are seeking asylum from lack of a job or lack of food is not an acceptable cause for asylum. The US needs to define the acceptable reasons for asylum and hold firm on them

They have been totally defined already on every aspect of asylum seekers. In the treaties and domestic law.

 

[jbander]

The laws and treaties do not require us to allow the asylum seekers free reign in the U.S. for more than a decade while they supposedly wait for their court date. We've always held asylum seekers for processing, it's nothing new.

They don't like waiting in a dentention center, let them go ask someone else for asylum, like all those other countries to which Democrats love to unfavorably compare the U.S. of A.

Treaties can be broken, just ask the Souix. Laws can be changes. Neither laws, nor treaties are suicide pacts. Governments led by both parties broke the constitution due to the pandemic of COVID. Now we have a pandemic of illegals, that will break our country if we don't stop them.

You should just say, "I want as many illegals as possible to flow into the country as soon as possible, because ____________________," and fill the blank with your honest answer. That would be interesting . . .

not one solution that will do anything. You have to resolve the laws that protect these people. So tell us how you are going to do it.

 

[Seymour Flops]

What a hoot , These treaties are instigated by this country and the whole world , or at least the civilized world has signed them, TRY again ace. What this gibberish about being a suicide pac. One question, how are you going to get us out of these treaties that are signed by every civilized country in the world, and where will you get the votes to overturn or rewrite our domestic laws that protect these people.

That's a different question. You're asking if we have the political will to stop the flow of so-called "refugees." So far the answer is no.

If we ever have it, the logistics will be remarkably easy. "How would you stop them" would be a self-answering question.

 

[jbander]

The laws and treaties do not require us to allow the asylum seekers free reign in the U.S. for more than a decade while they supposedly wait for their court date. We've always held asylum seekers for processing, it's nothing new.

They don't like waiting in a dentention center, let them go ask someone else for asylum, like all those other countries to which Democrats love to unfavorably compare the U.S. of A.

Treaties can be broken, just ask the Souix. Laws can be changes. Neither laws, nor treaties are suicide pacts. Governments led by both parties broke the constitution due to the pandemic of COVID. Now we have a pandemic of illegals, that will break our country if we don't stop them.

You should just say, "I want as many illegals as possible to flow into the country as soon as possible, because ____________________," and fill the blank with your honest answer. That would be interesting . . .

So your solution is to break the treaty that we were one of the main instigators of. Wow , that's real cool, ace.

 

[jbander]

That's a different question. You're asking if we have the political will to stop the flow of so-called "refugees." So far the answer is no.

If we ever have it, the logistics will be remarkably easy. "How would you stop them" would bes a self-answering question.

No way to do it in your response. Give us a little meat here.

 

[jbander]

That's a different question. You're asking if we have the political will to stop the flow of so-called "refugees." So far the answer is no.

If we ever have it, the logistics will be remarkably easy. "How would you stop them" would bes a self-answering question.

if it is so easy tell us those logistics.

 

[Desperado]

So your solution is to break the treaty that we were one of the main instigators of. Wow , that's real cool, ace.

If that is what it takes. Do what is best for America and Americans the hell with the invaders

 

[jbander]

Let's put this into perspective. Even Biden's asylum restrictions at the border are being challenged, and Biden will lose in court. There are tons of laws protecting these people and it is really hard to write new laws that override existing laws that we literally can't get out of or change.

 

[jbander]

If that is what it takes. Do what is best for America and Americans the hell with the invaders

Now this is where your opinion breaks down, illegal aliens are good for this countries economy.

 

[jbander]

The laws and treaties do not require us to allow the asylum seekers free reign in the U.S. for more than a decade while they supposedly wait for their court date. We've always held asylum seekers for processing, it's nothing new.

They don't like waiting in a dentention center, let them go ask someone else for asylum, like all those other countries to which Democrats love to unfavorably compare the U.S. of A.

Treaties can be broken, just ask the Souix. Laws can be changes. Neither laws, nor treaties are suicide pacts. Governments led by both parties broke the constitution due to the pandemic of COVID. Now we have a pandemic of illegals, that will break our country if we don't stop them.

You should just say, "I want as many illegals as possible to flow into the country as soon as possible, because ____________________," and fill the blank with your honest answer. That would be interesting . . .

The length of time is because of the backlog , it has absolutely nothing to do with any law that are protecting these people. Your comment is a nothing. The only way to quicken the pace is putting millions of dollars into the system to do it faster.

 

[Seymour Flops]

So your solution is to break the treaty that we were one of the main instigators of. Wow , that's real cool, ace.

Yes, of course. Better than than to watch our country be destroyed.

It is much cooler, joker, than the hell this country will be if we don't stop the flow.

 

[Seymour Flops]

The length of time is because of the backlog , it has absolutely nothing to do with any law that are protecting these people. Your comment is a nothing. The only way to quicken the pace is putting millions of dollars into the system to do it faster.

Why should we? Let the migrants who made it in under Biden pay for it, through a tax on remittances. That's to pay for the holding cages, like the ones Obama built. If they want a more luxurious waiting area, let the cartels that send them here pay for them.

 

[Seymour Flops]

The OP seems convinced that hard-working Americans citizens owe these trespassers something. How did we incur such a debt? I don't remember signing anything.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

How about we give them a green card and let them find a job.......

Offer a green card. Give them a bullet to the back of the head when they show up.

 

[Seymour Flops]

OMG, look at the latest plan from those evil rightwingers:

• Increasing the Use of Expedited Removal. Effective immediately, individuals who attempt to enter the United States without permission, do not have a legal basis to remain, and cannot be expelled pursuant to Title 42 will be increasingly subject to expedited removal to their country of origin and subject to a five-year ban on reentry.

How did the rightwingers convince Biden to say that?

FACT SHEET: Biden-Harris Administration Announces New Border Enforcement Actions | The White House

New Measures Leverage Success of Venezuela Enforcement Initiative to Limit Disorderly and Unsafe Migration While the courts have prevented the Title 42

www.whitehouse.gov

 

[Desperado]

Now this is where your opinion breaks down, illegal aliens are good for this countries economy.

Only because you say so, but not the case in reality

 

[Seymour Flops]

jbander, for future reference, the reason this thread went south for you so quickly is that the title is deliberately misleading. It sounds like a challenge to describe the logistics of securing the border. If you want more of your sister Democrats to jump on the bandwagon, your title should have been: "We CAN'T Stop Illegals from Coming in and Staying in because Treaties. So, there!"

Then you would have started the conversation that you wanted to have.

But then, that would have gone south on you also, so never mind . . .

 

[jbander]

Yes, of course. Better than than to watch our country be destroyed.

It is much cooler, joker, than the hell this country will be if we don't stop the flow.

Are you nuts, there is no, as in zero indication, that that is even an issue, This whole country is made up of immigrants. And these people are the same, just as good and just as bad, as all the migrants that make up this country in its entirety. I would rather have a neighborhood full of these immigrants, than the haters that make up the stupid, nonsensical opposition to these people. Where in the hell do you even get these ridiculous ideas.

 

[jbander]

Why should we? Let the migrants who made it in under Biden pay for it, through a tax on remittances. That's to pay for the holding cages, like the ones Obama built. If they want a more luxurious waiting area, let the cartels that send them here pay for them.

That is as far as I can go with your nonsense. You are so full of nonsense and hatred that your reasoning is lacking even the slightest bit of reality.

 

[jbander]

The OP seems convinced that hard-working Americans citizens owe these trespassers something. How did we incur such a debt? I don't remember signing anything.

Again, ding dong read the thread, this has nothing to do with what we are talking about here. And I won't let you hijack this thread, so you can spread your hatred without logic or reason or truth. Where do you get this garbage.