Signature update

Just a reminder:

In a landmark 1973 case, Norwood v. Harrison, the Supreme Court held that government “may not induce, encourage or promote private persons to accomplish what it is constitutionally forbidden to accomplish.”
So?
 
The outcome of that case may not stop our commie government from trampling on our first amendment rights, but at least it is slowing the destruction. The outcome of that case is certainly inconvenient for lefties.
 
The outcome of that case may not stop our commie government from trampling on our first amendment rights, but at least it is slowing the destruction. The outcome of that case is certainly inconvenient for lefties.
Makes no sense
Government must follow the law, no shit
Nothing new
 
Makes no sense
Government must follow the law, no shit
Nothing new
"White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Thursday the Biden administration is identifying “problematic” posts for Facebook to censor because they contain “misinformation” about COVID-19."

 
"White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Thursday the Biden administration is identifying “problematic” posts for Facebook to censor because they contain “misinformation” about COVID-19."


The White House has no capability to censure anything on Facebook. They can only identify information that is false.
It is up to Facebook to manage their site
 
The White House has no capability to censure anything on Facebook. They can only identify information that is false.
It is up to Facebook to manage their site
Are you trying to conflate "induce, promote, or encourage" with direct management of facebook?

Read more carefully, and you will see why lefties are steering clear of this:

In a landmark 1973 case, Norwood v. Harrison, the Supreme Court held that government “may not induce, encourage or promote private persons to accomplish what it is constitutionally forbidden to accomplish.”
 

Forum List

Back
Top