Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Do you think lefties believe this?
They believe whatever they're told by The Party to believe.....Not a micro-shred of principle in any of them.Do you think lefties believe this?
Thirty years ago, I thought religious fundamentalists were the stupidist people on Earth as they thumped their bibles and claimed that dinosaur bones were placed on Earth by Satan to fool us all.They believe whatever they're told by The Party to believe.....Not a micro-shred of principle in any of them.
How about if you inform your "jabber" of your concern and they collect more metadata from you for a more comprehensive understanding of the physiology of those who may believe they may be more at risk? It would be helpful to be able to identify those who may be more at risk to be able to find better solutions.Is censorship, cancel culture, deplatforming, and suppression of speech building trust in those who don't trust the jab? Will the inevitable answers that evade this opening post question build trust in those who don't trust the jab? My personal opinion is that transparency is the only way to reach those who do not trust the jab.
"Is censorship, cancel culture, deplatforming, and suppression of speech building trust in those who don't trust the jab? Will the inevitable answers that evade this opening post question build trust in those who don't trust the jab?"How about if you inform your "jabber" of your concern and they collect more metadata from you for a more comprehensive understanding of the physiology of those who may believe they may be more at risk? It would be helpful to be able to identify those who may be more at risk to be able to find better solutions.
The point is you don't have to trust the jab to get jabbed."Is censorship, cancel culture, deplatforming, and suppression of speech building trust in those who don't trust the jab? Will the inevitable answers that evade this opening post question build trust in those who don't trust the jab?"
The bold portion of my opening post quote above addressed your post before you even clicked on this thread.
it makes it more difficult to believe those who are not getting the jab believe in natural rights and we should ignore them for the hypocrites they are?What does this evasion have to do with the opening post question?
Why support censorship, cancel culture, and suppression of speech as a way to get people to get the jab if you KNOW it is not working? Isn't the goal to get everybody to get the jab? Why not just tell people the truth instead of using all these ineffective censorship shenanigans?I see even fewer replies in any threads that right-wingers have more than fallacy instead of any valid arguments for rebuttal, yet right-wingers support the tactics of fallacy over reason.
What censorship?Why support censorship, cancel culture, and suppression of speech as a way to get people to get the jab if you KNOW it is not working? Isn't the goal to get everybody to get the jab? Why not just tell people the truth instead of using all these ineffective censorship shenanigans?
This censorship:What censorship?
www.usmessageboard.com
