CDZ Should the parents of gang members be arrested for accessory to murder, manslaughter and attempted murder?

There are children younger than him who are given shotguns, and rifles to go hunting with their parents......they use the guns under the direct supervision of the parents...

How do you know that the pistol was used differently?

There are so many assumptions because of the need to make an example of these parents......and the anti-gun left sees this as an opportunity to push their agenda.

why they didn't just take him home

How about they needed time to process what they learned and what they needed to do.....and they may have considered he was in a safe, secure location, surrounded by education professionals .......they were in a very stressful situation....perhaps they wanted to be able to discuss what to do without the kid in the home so they could talk freely?

Ever think of that?
Did they hire you to do PR for them? You can't just even acknowledge and accept that they screwed up, at least twice that day? Once when they didn't secure the firearm from their kid (who considered it his) and twice when they had the opportunity to remove him from a situation which was potentially hostile, thus damaging to him until they could sort out what really was going on?

Unfortunately what was really going on was exactly what the school administrators feared.
 
Thank you........that was a great reply....too many of the others posting here are making assumptions about the situation....without any knowledge or understanding of what actually went on.
When people post their activities on social media sites and other's quote them on the things they say, that's not exactly posting without knowledge or understanding.
 
7 year old competitive shooter.......


Why do expect me to be impressed by any of this? They're not the problem.

Are you actually arguing that 4 days from purchase to school shooting indicates in some way that this kid received adequate training and education on the proper use of "his" new firearm? Do you think they perhaps covered "misuse"?
 
Did they hire you to do PR for them? You can't just even acknowledge and accept that they screwed up, at least twice that day? Once when they didn't secure the firearm from their kid (who considered it his) and twice when they had the opportunity to remove him from a situation which was potentially hostile, thus damaging to him until they could sort out what really was going on?

Unfortunately what was really going on was exactly what the school administrators feared.

Their attorney stated to the judge…..you know…in court……where lying to the judge can get the lawyer put in front of the Bar…..that the gun was secured….

I ask this court to note that full discovery has not been available and that the court is only aware of the facts the Prosecution has presented, but that gun was actually locked, so when the prosecution is stating that this child had free access to a gun, that is just absolutely not true

 
Why do expect me to be impressed by any of this? They're not the problem.

Are you actually arguing that 4 days from purchase to school shooting indicates in some way that this kid received adequate training and education on the proper use of "his" new firearm? Do you think they perhaps covered "misuse"?

No…that you would ask that question deserves a response not allowed in the CDZ……….

I am responding to the idea that kids shouldn’t be allowed to use guns, by showing kids using guns responsibly and with proper supervision……..and if this wasn’t the CDZ I would end this post differently….
 
The parents of the Michigan school shooter have been arrested and charged with manslaughter......the warning they apparently recieved about their child was a scary picture and scary writing...the day the shooting occurred....

Meanwhile...the parent/parents of actual gang members have far more knowledge of their violent children and their activities........up to and including murder, manslaughter.....

Should the parents of gang members be charged with the same crimes as the Michigan school shooter>
We make exceptions for black murderers. We really don't expect anything more from them
 
Did they hire you to do PR for them? You can't just even acknowledge and accept that they screwed up, at least twice that day? Once when they didn't secure the firearm from their kid (who considered it his) and twice when they had the opportunity to remove him from a situation which was potentially hostile, thus damaging to him until they could sort out what really was going on?

Unfortunately what was really going on was exactly what the school administrators feared.

Again……he was in what they likely thought was a controlled environment….you know…..under the supervision of trained, professional educators and very likely school security…….and since the school didn’t tell them they considered him an immediate and deadly threat…how did you think they should react?
 
Let me ask..... Is it fact or just alleged that she sent this ^^^^^^^^^ text? "Don't do it."

You didn't answer this ^^^^^^^^^
What's your point? If she found out he stole the gun, and she realized his state of mind, it shows me she acted responsibly
 
Did they hire you to do PR for them? You can't just even acknowledge and accept that they screwed up, at least twice that day? Once when they didn't secure the firearm from their kid (who considered it his) and twice when they had the opportunity to remove him from a situation which was potentially hostile, thus damaging to him until they could sort out what really was going on?

Unfortunately what was really going on was exactly what the school administrators feared.

No…if they actually feared an attack they would have called the p9lice or the school security guys……….that they didn’t means they did not consider him an immediate and deadly threat………..considering they had him in the building and didn’t bring him to the office or search his locker or backpack…..
 
What's your point? If she found out he stole the gun, and she realized his state of mind, it shows me she acted responsibly

The defense attorney is saying the prosecutor is lying about the gun being unlocked………
 
Well, at least until they’re 18. You are absolutely on the right track though it should be a lot longer. A human’s brainstem doesn’t fully connect to the frontal lobe, where logical thoughts are formulated, until around the age of 25.

Had we known this information 2 1/2 centuries ago, our US laws would be much up-to-date with actual “body clocks”. The legal age of drinking alcohol, possibly other laws, would’ve been set at a higher age. Can you imagine the public outcry now if congress tried to raise it now? Lol No way will any state attempt to raise legal drinking age to match this info of course- Mutinies and riots would break out in all states!
Children shouldn't be voting until 25 to 30 either
 
They know their kid is a gang member, ..............the baby mommas, sisters, mothers, grandmothers are often the straw buyers who buy the guns illegally for their family gang member..........
Of course, many of them face being injured (or murdered) for refusing to do so.
 
The parents of the Michigan school shooter have been arrested and charged with manslaughter......the warning they apparently recieved about their child was a scary picture and scary writing...the day the shooting occurred....

Meanwhile...the parent/parents of actual gang members have far more knowledge of their violent children and their activities........up to and including murder, manslaughter.....

Should the parents of gang members be charged with the same crimes as the Michigan school shooter>

If the kid is living at home and the parents are the legal guardians...sure. I see no problem with that. That old man Lanza is still walking around is a travesty.
 

Forum List

Back
Top