Does anyone know WHY the justices refused to actually read the bill they are being paid to rule on?
Asked and answered. Cruel and Unusual punishment. This isn't surprising since no one has ever read the bill. We pay legislators who never read the bill before they voted on it. The people who wrote it never read it. It was written in sections, by committee. Those who wrote a section never read the sections written by others.
So, in your humble opinion, the justices can make an informed decision on the Constitutionality of the bill without ever reading it?
Well that's how Obama did it. Why would you expect SCOTUS to do more than the POTUS was willing to do?