Should PTSD patients be able to purchase weapons

Sorry but you do not get to dictate what a person can lawfully do. If it is legal to carry open and someone does it you have no right or power to stop them. And being afraid of them is childish and foolish.

Actually, you are wrong. I do get to dictate as much as every other State Citizen can. While I support the CCW, the open carry like it done today in some states is dangerous as hell. If a shooter comes in with PTSD, you and those like you are the primary targets first. Now the real target that may stop the shooter may be that smiling old grandmother with her CCW and her weapon hidden from site. All you are going to do is add to the number of weapons that shooter has to work with. Meanwhile, Grandma and other like here are the real inhibitor.

We do need to call ahead when you go to a theater so that everyone in there knows not to chew gum and text. We all know how dangerous a gum chewing texter is.
I dare you to try and tell an open carry person they have no right to exercise that right, call a cop and watch your entire claim go up in smoke.

Do you mean that a business (like a cafe) decides you can't enter with your weapon you can bully your way in? Guess who goes to jail and LOSES your right to open carry? What you going to do, shoot your way in? Grandma may be waiting.
Unless the law stipulates that a business can bar weapons guess what? You can not.
 
Sorry but you do not get to dictate what a person can lawfully do. If it is legal to carry open and someone does it you have no right or power to stop them. And being afraid of them is childish and foolish.

Actually, you are wrong. I do get to dictate as much as every other State Citizen can. While I support the CCW, the open carry like it done today in some states is dangerous as hell. If a shooter comes in with PTSD, you and those like you are the primary targets first. Now the real target that may stop the shooter may be that smiling old grandmother with her CCW and her weapon hidden from site. All you are going to do is add to the number of weapons that shooter has to work with. Meanwhile, Grandma and other like here are the real inhibitor.

We do need to call ahead when you go to a theater so that everyone in there knows not to chew gum and text. We all know how dangerous a gum chewing texter is.
I dare you to try and tell an open carry person they have no right to exercise that right, call a cop and watch your entire claim go up in smoke.

Do you mean that a business (like a cafe) decides you can't enter with your weapon you can bully your way in? Guess who goes to jail and LOSES your right to open carry? What you going to do, shoot your way in? Grandma may be waiting.
Unless the law stipulates that a business can bar weapons guess what? You can not.

Wrong. Since it's the business owners right to refuse weapons, the law would have to over ride him. You push it and you get the cops pointing their weapons at you, the removal of your weapon and some nice stainless steet bracelets while being escorted to the County Hotel. Once again, you would refuse others rights. Figures.
 
Thank you for clarifying this. You are exactly the type of person that should NOT be armed. You see danger around every corner. Or you go into areas that are high crime areas.

And you have a vivid imagination and an endless ability to make unwarranted assumptions. Now we find that you are not against people armed as long as it is concealed or you approve their reasons for being armed. You need to learn the difference between fear and caution and come to terms with your phobia related to guns. This is my country and no one is going to make me afraid to go or live in any place allowed by law.
 
What you going to do, shoot your way in? Grandma may be waiting.

But Granny won't be there if you have forbidden weapons which is a shame because she might have saved your ass from the thugs who like to rob such gun-free places.
 
Thank you for clarifying this. You are exactly the type of person that should NOT be armed. You see danger around every corner. Or you go into areas that are high crime areas.

And you have a vivid imagination and an endless ability to make unwarranted assumptions. Now we find that you are not against people armed as long as it is concealed or you approve their reasons for being armed. You need to learn the difference between fear and caution and come to terms with your phobia related to guns. This is my country and no one is going to make me afraid to go or live in any place allowed by law.

How about this. Either you leave or the Cops will be there post haste. Of course, the way I sign off after giving the address is that if they don't get there soon, they can come in and scrape your sorry ass off the front of my door. I will also mention that you are armed. Guess what kind of reception you are going to get? Cops will enter with their guns drawn and pointed right at you. If you start drawing that weapon at any time, you will be splattered all over the front door. There is no intimidation or control for you on this one. You lose. Better to let the cops disarm and cuff you than making a point against the store owner.

You seem to believe that only you have rights. Wrong. It's my right not to allow you to enter my establishment with your open carry. You will be give the choice of going out to your car, locking the gun up and then returning OR to leave and not come back. If you try and intimidate your way in, it will be assumed that you will use that weapon. You will get only one chance to leave at that point and never return. The Cops will be there soon, but will they get there soon enough? A Shotgun deploys faster than your hand gun.

You are a bully who thinks that you have all the rights. A Model 870 disagrees with that point of view.
 
What you going to do, shoot your way in? Grandma may be waiting.

But Granny won't be there if you have forbidden weapons which is a shame because she might have saved your ass from the thugs who like to rob such gun-free places.

Is it gun free? Or do we not allow nutcases like you in there. Grandma may not be there but Model 870 is. If the thugs come in with weapons out, it's time to try and make it as bloodless as possible. If a hero like you is in there, you will try and take your weapon out and the blood starts to flow on both sides. A couple of hundred isn't worth that. Now, if they start with the blood letting, my Model 870 deploys mighty fast from the other side of the counter. Much faster than your handgun with the safety strap. The best way to keep the bad guy from being stupid is to make them guess if anyone is armed or not. Advertise that you are armed means they may come in shooting.
 
Thank you for clarifying this. You are exactly the type of person that should NOT be armed. You see danger around every corner. Or you go into areas that are high crime areas.

And you have a vivid imagination and an endless ability to make unwarranted assumptions. Now we find that you are not against people armed as long as it is concealed or you approve their reasons for being armed. You need to learn the difference between fear and caution and come to terms with your phobia related to guns. This is my country and no one is going to make me afraid to go or live in any place allowed by law.

How about this. Either you leave or the Cops will be there post haste. Of course, the way I sign off after giving the address is that if they don't get there soon, they can come in and scrape your sorry ass off the front of my door. I will also mention that you are armed. Guess what kind of reception you are going to get? Cops will enter with their guns drawn and pointed right at you. If you start drawing that weapon at any time, you will be splattered all over the front door. There is no intimidation or control for you on this one. You lose. Better to let the cops disarm and cuff you than making a point against the store owner.

You seem to believe that only you have rights. Wrong. It's my right not to allow you to enter my establishment with your open carry. You will be give the choice of going out to your car, locking the gun up and then returning OR to leave and not come back. If you try and intimidate your way in, it will be assumed that you will use that weapon. You will get only one chance to leave at that point and never return. The Cops will be there soon, but will they get there soon enough? A Shotgun deploys faster than your hand gun.

You are a bully who thinks that you have all the rights. A Model 870 disagrees with that point of view.
Wait, so you get to have weapons but others don't? Hypocrite. As to law try telling a gay couple you won't make a cake for them then tell me that you have the right to refuse service for anyreason.
 
Thank you for clarifying this. You are exactly the type of person that should NOT be armed. You see danger around every corner. Or you go into areas that are high crime areas.

And you have a vivid imagination and an endless ability to make unwarranted assumptions. Now we find that you are not against people armed as long as it is concealed or you approve their reasons for being armed. You need to learn the difference between fear and caution and come to terms with your phobia related to guns. This is my country and no one is going to make me afraid to go or live in any place allowed by law.

How about this. Either you leave or the Cops will be there post haste. Of course, the way I sign off after giving the address is that if they don't get there soon, they can come in and scrape your sorry ass off the front of my door. I will also mention that you are armed. Guess what kind of reception you are going to get? Cops will enter with their guns drawn and pointed right at you. If you start drawing that weapon at any time, you will be splattered all over the front door. There is no intimidation or control for you on this one. You lose. Better to let the cops disarm and cuff you than making a point against the store owner.

You seem to believe that only you have rights. Wrong. It's my right not to allow you to enter my establishment with your open carry. You will be give the choice of going out to your car, locking the gun up and then returning OR to leave and not come back. If you try and intimidate your way in, it will be assumed that you will use that weapon. You will get only one chance to leave at that point and never return. The Cops will be there soon, but will they get there soon enough? A Shotgun deploys faster than your hand gun.

You are a bully who thinks that you have all the rights. A Model 870 disagrees with that point of view.
Wait, so you get to have weapons but others don't? Hypocrite. As to law try telling a gay couple you won't make a cake for them then tell me that you have the right to refuse service for anyreason.

On my personal property, I do get to say who is openly armed. How about No One. And that has already been upheld in court. You have the choice to either leave and return without the open carry or just leave. You seem to believe that only one group should have rights and those rights supercede all others rights. The Courts disagrees with you. I would not be refusing service, only the entering the establishment openly armed.

If I were a shooter, the first one to die would be the idiot trying to get that weapon from the holster by having to remove the safety strap first. and if you are walking around without a safety strap on that weapon then some punk will just grab it out of your holster and shoot with the danged thing. MOST are not that stupid.

CCW is the way to go and if I don't know you are carrying because it's a CCW then I don't care. IT's been proven it's not healthy to go to the movies, chew gum and text. You may buy the farm from an Open Carry person. Its already happened. And we all know just how dangerous those movie going, gum chewing, Those people have to be stopped at all costs.
 
While I support the CCW, the open carry like it done today in some states is dangerous as hell. If a shooter comes in with PTSD, you and those like you are the primary targets first. Now the real target that may stop the shooter may be that smiling old grandmother with her CCW and her weapon hidden from site. All you are going to do is add to the number of weapons that shooter has to work with. Meanwhile, Grandma and other like here are the real inhibitor.

We do need to call ahead when you go to a theater so that everyone in there knows not to chew gum and text. We all know how dangerous a gum chewing texter is.

That is stupid. People can't conceal rifles or shotguns. Business owners & customers in Ferguson, Missouri have to conspicuously open carry to prevent attack, looting, firebombing, destruction of property & death.
 
Last edited:
While I support the CCW, the open carry like it done today in some states is dangerous as hell. If a shooter comes in with PTSD, you and those like you are the primary targets first. Now the real target that may stop the shooter may be that smiling old grandmother with her CCW and her weapon hidden from site. All you are going to do is add to the number of weapons that shooter has to work with. Meanwhile, Grandma and other like here are the real inhibitor.

We do need to call ahead when you go to a theater so that everyone in there knows not to chew gum and text. We all know how dangerous a gum chewing texter is.

That is stupid. People can't conceal rifles or shotguns. Business owners & customers in Ferguson, Missouri have to conspicuously open carry to prevent attack, looting, firebombing, destruction of property & death.

So I am stupid, right? Having a weapon behind the counter is as old as weapons themselves. Before guns, clubs were kept behind the counter. And it gives the proprieter something to use as a blind to fire from. Funny you should bring up Ferguson. Most people don't have guns when they are outside their homes. You are just making it up as you go.
 
While I support the CCW, the open carry like it done today in some states is dangerous as hell. If a shooter comes in with PTSD, you and those like you are the primary targets first. Now the real target that may stop the shooter may be that smiling old grandmother with her CCW and her weapon hidden from site. All you are going to do is add to the number of weapons that shooter has to work with. Meanwhile, Grandma and other like here are the real inhibitor.

We do need to call ahead when you go to a theater so that everyone in there knows not to chew gum and text. We all know how dangerous a gum chewing texter is.

That is stupid. People can't conceal rifles or shotguns. Business owners & customers in Ferguson, Missouri have to conspicuously open carry to prevent attack, looting, firebombing, destruction of property & death.

So I am stupid, right? Having a weapon behind the counter is as old as weapons themselves. Before guns, clubs were kept behind the counter. And it gives the proprieter something to use as a blind to fire from. Funny you should bring up Ferguson. Most people don't have guns when they are outside their homes. You are just making it up as you go.

Without Open Carry this Ferguson business would have burnt to the ground like the one across the street did.
5476b9bd5d95b.image_.jpg


These Ferguson Businesses would have been destroyed if it were not for Open Carry
Ferguson-Looting-Posted-by-Michael-Calhoun-On-Twitter.jpg

tatoogunshop1.jpg

453689558.jpg

Same for the LA business
iNTOyFX.jpg
 
Last edited:
I have ptsd. hyperalert hyperawareness. I am perfectly fit to carry a weapon my body is just always extremely aware of my surroundings and has grown accustom to 4 hours of sleep. it is annoying but does not affect my ability to handle a weapon.
 
While I support the CCW, the open carry like it done today in some states is dangerous as hell. If a shooter comes in with PTSD, you and those like you are the primary targets first. Now the real target that may stop the shooter may be that smiling old grandmother with her CCW and her weapon hidden from site. All you are going to do is add to the number of weapons that shooter has to work with. Meanwhile, Grandma and other like here are the real inhibitor.

We do need to call ahead when you go to a theater so that everyone in there knows not to chew gum and text. We all know how dangerous a gum chewing texter is.

That is stupid. People can't conceal rifles or shotguns. Business owners & customers in Ferguson, Missouri have to conspicuously open carry to prevent attack, looting, firebombing, destruction of property & death.

So I am stupid, right? Having a weapon behind the counter is as old as weapons themselves. Before guns, clubs were kept behind the counter. And it gives the proprieter something to use as a blind to fire from. Funny you should bring up Ferguson. Most people don't have guns when they are outside their homes. You are just making it up as you go.

Without Open Carry this Ferguson business would have burnt to the ground like the one across the street did.
5476b9bd5d95b.image_.jpg


These Ferguson Businesses would have been destroyed if it were not for Open Carry
Ferguson-Looting-Posted-by-Michael-Calhoun-On-Twitter.jpg

tatoogunshop1.jpg

453689558.jpg

Same for the LA business
iNTOyFX.jpg
Nice shot of Gang Bangers. Standard Paussnews reporting. Just make it up as you go.
 
I have ptsd. hyperalert hyperawareness. I am perfectly fit to carry a weapon my body is just always extremely aware of my surroundings and has grown accustom to 4 hours of sleep. it is annoying but does not affect my ability to handle a weapon.

When I see all the fruitcakes running around with Open Carry, I would rather have you around than them.
 
Chris Kyle's murderer will plead PTSD. An Army Veteran was arrested yesterday for threatening to kill his wife and any other person near her even though his wife works in the Capital building in Washington. His defense is PTSD. Still want to allow these guys to ignore the part about mental illness or lie about it when they fill out the ATF form to purchase a firearm?
 
Chris Kyle's murderer will plead PTSD. An Army Veteran was arrested yesterday for threatening to kill his wife and any other person near her even though his wife works in the Capital building in Washington. His defense is PTSD. Still want to allow these guys to ignore the part about mental illness or lie about it when they fill out the ATF form to purchase a firearm?

ptsd is still necogised as a reason to deny a gun permit. Now, threatening to kill everyone around you openly IS grounds for denying a gun permit of any kind. You are convicting a person before they break the law.
 
15th post
ptsd is still necogised as a reason to deny a gun permit. Now, threatening to kill everyone around you openly IS grounds for denying a gun permit of any kind. You are convicting a person before they break the law.

In what universe? Here in the real world judicial action is required for the denial of constitutional rights. A person who has been committed to a mental facility or been judged incompetent has been in front of a judge.
 
ptsd is still necogised as a reason to deny a gun permit. Now, threatening to kill everyone around you openly IS grounds for denying a gun permit of any kind. You are convicting a person before they break the law.

In what universe? Here in the real world judicial action is required for the denial of constitutional rights. A person who has been committed to a mental facility or been judged incompetent has been in front of a judge.

Wrong. You can also be under a restraining order, being investigated for making public death threats, etc. The permit will be investigated against your police file. And it's up to either the Sheriff's office or Police department whether you get it or not. You do have the right to contest it afterwards which is done infrequently. Hate to break it to you but you don't get to make the rules up as you go.
 
Chris Kyle's murderer will plead PTSD. An Army Veteran was arrested yesterday for threatening to kill his wife and any other person near her even though his wife works in the Capital building in Washington. His defense is PTSD. Still want to allow these guys to ignore the part about mental illness or lie about it when they fill out the ATF form to purchase a firearm?
Once again the law allows the Local authorities to bring anyone suspected of a mental problem before a judge. You want to just arbitrarily deny rights based on no findings. Guess what you don't get to do that.
 
First of all I do not agree with the current administration's opinion that American Military Veterans should be suspected of engaging in domestic terrorism. I do, however, believe that Veterans who have been determined to be so psychotic that they are awarded a disability pension related to their mental disorder should never be able to legally possess or purchase a firearm unless their specific psychiatric veterans administrator signs off on each forearm.
But what purpose would that serve? Would it prevent someone who wants a firearm from obtaining one, or more than one?

The situation is analogous to recreational drugs. For the past four decades government at all levels has inflicted severe harm on the Nation in the name of the War On Drugs, yet at this time any illegal drug is available within ten miles of any inhabited part of the U.S. to anyone with money to spend. And anyone who really wants to buy a gun and has money to spend will find someone who has guns for sale.

And the more rigid the gun laws become the more active the bootlegging will be.
 
Back
Top Bottom