Crime rates rise and fall due to a variety of socio-economic and political factors. Gun control doesn’t change that. What it does affect is deaths by gun-related violence and no matter what metric you use, the gap between the US rates and U.K. rates is huge.
Yeah, I agree with everything until your last claim. You are implying that the difference in rates, is because of gun laws.
There is no evidence of that. Gun crime was lower in the UK, before they had all these gun control laws.
This supports your first statement, but not your second. Your first statement is correct. There are a variety of factors that affect crime rates. Which is why, again, gun crime was lower in the UK before the gun laws were all passed.
What doesn't fit is the claim that all gun laws did something.
Gun crime actually increased slightly after passing gun control laws.
More than one in five victims of firearms offences, excluding air weapons, was aged under 20.
www.bbc.com
And gun crime is on the rise. So clearly those gun laws are not effective. And again, never were. Gun crime was lower before all the gun laws were put into effect.
Gun laws do nothing. You can make a gun from hardware store parts. You can make bullets too.
Just like drug laws haven't stopped drugs, so have gun laws not stopped guns. And it is ridiculous to think so.
What stops crime of all types, is ruthless enforcement of the law. Short of that, your laws do nothing but harm the innocent, and make life safe for criminals.