Sheriff Joe Arpaio Sues Barack Obama Over Executive Amnesty

He's already under investigation so I doubt he fears much.

The states need to sue Obama for a writ of mandamus, ordering him to enforce laws on the books. Tennessee is already authorizing such a suit.

Prosecutor discretion is a power possessed by the President or any executive. Its gonna be an uphill suit.
No. The president or executive does not have the power simply to declare he wont enforce a whole class of laws simply because he disagrees with the law. Tht would make him a dictator.

Tell that to Reagan who arbitrarily determined by EO that he wouldn't deport 200,000 Nicaraguans, despite immigration law indicating they should all be deported.

Or Bush who arbitrarily determined by EO that he wouldn't deport spouses, despite immigration law indicating they should be deported.

Prosecutorial discretion existed when it was republicans making the EOs. It exists when a democrat makes them. There's a reason why republican lawsuits have such a piss poor record of success in court; because their legal arguments are based solely on the party of in power when an EO is issued. Not on the policy of the EO.

And judges can smell political theater from a mile away, even if you can't.

And the far left propaganda rolls on...

Obama 8217 s Immigration Amnesia
 
He's already under investigation so I doubt he fears much.

The states need to sue Obama for a writ of mandamus, ordering him to enforce laws on the books. Tennessee is already authorizing such a suit.

Prosecutor discretion is a power possessed by the President or any executive. Its gonna be an uphill suit.
No. The president or executive does not have the power simply to declare he wont enforce a whole class of laws simply because he disagrees with the law. Tht would make him a dictator.

Tell that to Reagan who arbitrarily determined by EO that he wouldn't deport 200,000 Nicaraguans, despite immigration law indicating they should all be deported.

Or Bush who arbitrarily determined by EO that he wouldn't deport spouses, despite immigration law indicating they should be deported.

Prosecutorial discretion existed when it was republicans making the EOs. It exists when a democrat makes them. There's a reason why republican lawsuits have such a piss poor record of success in court; because their legal arguments are based solely on the party of in power when an EO is issued. Not on the policy of the EO.

And judges can smell political theater from a mile away, even if you can't.

And Sheriff Joe is the political equivalent of Vaudeville. Or perhaps midgets in colorful clothing hitting people with pig bladders.
Stupid people see similarities.
This is why you post as you do.
 
Sheriff Joe is nothing more then a blind partisan media whore. That being said, I do not believe these Executive Orders live up to the standards set forth by the Supreme Court in Youngstown Tube and Sheet Co. v. Sawyer. We'll see how it pans out.

Jorge was most certainly disappointed:

SNIP:

[Jorge] Ramos went on to say that the President must do more, and was still leaving out 6 million undocumented aliens that need help. Asked whether Obama had kept his promise, Ramos stated: Univision s Jorge Ramos Obama Paying Off Debt to Latinos Truth Revolt
 
All of us citizens should get together and SUE HIM. and put him in his place. But you go Joe, :clap2:someone is looking out for We the people in this country because Obama never has.

SNIP:
Posted by Jim Hoft on Friday, November 21, 2014, 8:46 AM
View attachment 34233

Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County sued Barack Obama over his unconstitutional executive amnesty today.
Sheriff Joe filed the suit in US District Court for the District of Columbia.
Freedom Watch reported:
(Washington, D.C., November 20, 2014) Today, in response to the executive order President Barack Obama has signed effectively granting amnesty to about a half of the illegal aliens currently in this country, Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Arizona filed a lawsuit to enjoin this unconstitutional act. This lawsuit can be found at www.freedomwatchusa.org.

Sheriff Arpaio’s lawyer is Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch, former federal prosecutor and founder of both Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch. Mr. Klayman recently succeeded in obtaining a preliminary injunction against the National Security Agency for having unconstitutionally accessed the telephonic metadata of nearly all American citizens. See Klayman v. Obama, et al (Civil Action No. 13-cv-851), filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
Upon filing the complaint, which is styled Arpaio v. Obama, et al. before the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (Civil Action No. 14-cv-1966), Sheriff Arpaio issued this statement:

ALL of it here:
Sheriff Joe Arpaio Sues Barack Obama Over Executive Amnesty The Gateway Pundit

I'm still anxiously awaiting the results of Sheriff Arpaio's deep, comprehensive, detailed, exhaustive investigation into the true birthplace of President Obama. I'm right on the edge of my seat, the anticipation is almost too much. When will this crime fighting crusader for justice finally reveal the earth shattering truth?

well good for you. so that's all? how about what the thread is about. nothing?

I just think Sheriff Arpaio deserves special recognition for all his patriotic efforts and tireless dedication to the truth......don't you?
 
He's already under investigation so I doubt he fears much.

The states need to sue Obama for a writ of mandamus, ordering him to enforce laws on the books. Tennessee is already authorizing such a suit.

Prosecutor discretion is a power possessed by the President or any executive. Its gonna be an uphill suit.
No. The president or executive does not have the power simply to declare he wont enforce a whole class of laws simply because he disagrees with the law. Tht would make him a dictator.

Tell that to Reagan who arbitrarily determined by EO that he wouldn't deport 200,000 Nicaraguans, despite immigration law indicating they should all be deported.

Or Bush who arbitrarily determined by EO that he wouldn't deport spouses, despite immigration law indicating they should be deported.

Prosecutorial discretion existed when it was republicans making the EOs. It exists when a democrat makes them. There's a reason why republican lawsuits have such a piss poor record of success in court; because their legal arguments are based solely on the party of in power when an EO is issued. Not on the policy of the EO.

And judges can smell political theater from a mile away, even if you can't.

And Sheriff Joe is the political equivalent of Vaudeville. Or perhaps midgets in colorful clothing hitting people with pig bladders.

do you like being a sheep? Were you even born during Reagan? Do you ever think for yourself or are you just a parrot for the DNC?
 
Hope he gets ready for a letter from the IRS.

uncle-sam-audit.ju.top.jpg


Careful. I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if we ALL don't get letters from the IRS before The Emperor leaves office.......
 
Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County sued Barack Obama over his unconstitutional executive amnesty today.

How embarrassing for him. Obama did not grant amnesty to anyone.

All this hysterical hyperbole and wailing and gnashing of teeth over this imaginary amnesty is akin to some jackass insisting a Governor should "enforce the law" and execute someone on death row that the Governor has just granted a stay of execution, and who claims the Governor just pardoned the poor son of a bitch.

These people are seriously confused.

Obama granted a stay of execution (delayed deportation), not a pardon (amnesty). This is a measure designed to prevent the death row inmate (illegal immigrants) from being executed (deported) so that a retrial (anmnesty bill in Congress) can take place. You don't execute (deport) someone who might be about to be found innocent (granted amnesty by Congress).

Hope that finally clears up the confusion for some people, but I am not in any way confident it will. The rubes have had their minds poisoned by the laced piss they drank. Their intellect is in a seriously weakened state by six years of a steady piss stream of misinformation and propaganda.
 
do you like being a sheep? Were you even born during Reagan? Do you ever think for yourself or are you just parrot?

I like being consistent. And using valid logic and reason. If I believe something is wrong, its wrong regardless of which political party does it. And that's what separates me from many conservatives. Its not the EO or its policies that conservatives object to....they were perfectly cool when Reagan and Bush did the exact same thing.

Its that a *democrat* is wielding that power. And that's an empty, hypocritical argument. As much as possible I argue what I actually believe. Not silly proxy issues.
 
Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County sued Barack Obama over his unconstitutional executive amnesty today.

How embarrassing for him. Obama did not grant amnesty to anyone.

All this hysterical hyperbole and wailing and gnashing of teeth over this imaginary amnesty is akin to some jackass insisting a Governor should "enforce the law" and execute someone on death row that the Governor has just granted a stay of execution, and who claims the Governor just pardoned the poor son of a bitch.

These people are seriously confused.

Obama granted a stay of execution (delayed deportation), not a pardon (amnesty). This is a measure designed to prevent the death row inmate (illegal immigrants) from being executed (deported) so that a retrial (anmnesty bill in Congress) can take place. You don't execute (deport) someone who might be about to be found innocent (granted amnesty by Congress).

Hope that finally clears up the confusion for some people, but I am not in any way confident it will. The rubes have had their minds poisoned by the laced piss they drank.


Article 1 section 8 of the Constitution - The Emperor doesn't have the ability to grant amnesty. ONLY THE CONGRESS SETS IMMIGRATION LAW.


Trust me. If The Emperor COULD have done it - he would have.
 
Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County sued Barack Obama over his unconstitutional executive amnesty today.

How embarrassing for him. Obama did not grant amnesty to anyone.

All this hysterical hyperbole and wailing and gnashing of teeth over this imaginary amnesty is akin to some jackass insisting a Governor should "enforce the law" and execute someone on death row that the Governor has just granted a stay of execution, and who claims the Governor just pardoned the poor son of a bitch.

These people are seriously confused.

Obama granted a stay of execution (delayed deportation), not a pardon (amnesty). This is a measure designed to prevent the death row inmate (illegal immigrants) from being executed (deported) so that a retrial (anmnesty bill in Congress) can take place. You don't execute (deport) someone who might be about to be found innocent (granted amnesty by Congress).

Hope that finally clears up the confusion for some people, but I am not in any way confident it will. The rubes have had their minds poisoned by the laced piss they drank. Their intellect is in a seriously weakened state by six years of a steady piss stream of misinformation and propaganda.

You stupid double talking liar. You fucking sock puppet.
 
do you like being a sheep? Were you even born during Reagan? Do you ever think for yourself or are you just a parrot for the DNC?

I first met Reagan in 1977. I voted for him in 1980 and 1984, and served as active duty military under him during his entire Presidency and beyond. I saw the military miraculously transformed under his leadership. He is on my Top Ten Heroes of All Time list, in third place, behind my dad and Abraham Lincoln.

Reagan would be embarrassed at the condition of the conservative movement today, just as I am.
 
Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County sued Barack Obama over his unconstitutional executive amnesty today.

How embarrassing for him. Obama did not grant amnesty to anyone.

All this hysterical hyperbole and wailing and gnashing of teeth over this imaginary amnesty is akin to some jackass insisting a Governor should "enforce the law" and execute someone on death row that the Governor has just granted a stay of execution, and who claims the Governor just pardoned the poor son of a bitch.

These people are seriously confused.

Obama granted a stay of execution (delayed deportation), not a pardon (amnesty). This is a measure designed to prevent the death row inmate (illegal immigrants) from being executed (deported) so that a retrial (anmnesty bill in Congress) can take place. You don't execute (deport) someone who might be about to be found innocent (granted amnesty by Congress).

Hope that finally clears up the confusion for some people, but I am not in any way confident it will. The rubes have had their minds poisoned by the laced piss they drank. Their intellect is in a seriously weakened state by six years of a steady piss stream of misinformation and propaganda.

You stupid double talking liar. You fucking sock puppet.
Brilliant retort! :laugh2:
 
do you like being a sheep? Were you even born during Reagan? Do you ever think for yourself or are you just a parrot for the DNC?

I first met Reagan in 1977. I voted for him in 1980 and 1984, and served as active duty military under him during his entire Presidency and beyond. He is on my Top Ten Heroes of All Time list, in third place, behind my dad and Abraham Lincoln.

Reagan would be embarrassed at the condition of the conservative movement today, just as I am.

Nice words, but yet it is to cover the fact that you have become a far left drone.
 
well good for you. so that's all? how about what the thread is about. nothing?

Well, you did get one thing right, the thread is about nothing.

Joe's should live in the real world like the rest of us. Things don't always work out perfectly and deporting millions of people is physically impossible and a grave danger to the economy
 
do you like being a sheep? Were you even born during Reagan? Do you ever think for yourself or are you just a parrot for the DNC?

I first met Reagan in 1977. I voted for him in 1980 and 1984, and served as active duty military under him during his entire Presidency and beyond. He is on my Top Ten Heroes of All Time list, in third place, behind my dad and Abraham Lincoln.

Reagan would be embarrassed at the condition of the conservative movement today, just as I am.

Nice words, but yet it is to cover the fact that you have become a far left drone.
Another brilliant retort! :laugh2:

I have no doubt you would be calling Reagan a far left drone if he were posting today.
 
do you like being a sheep? Were you even born during Reagan? Do you ever think for yourself or are you just a parrot for the DNC?

I first met Reagan in 1977. I voted for him in 1980 and 1984, and served as active duty military under him during his entire Presidency and beyond. He is on my Top Ten Heroes of All Time list, in third place, behind my dad and Abraham Lincoln.

Reagan would be embarrassed at the condition of the conservative movement today, just as I am.


I never had the opportunity to meet the gentleman - but I would have loved to have. I, too, served during his presidency as well as Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon and Ford. For my way of thinking - this country has never had a better man at the helm that Reagan. What other president would EVER do this:




Think your Emperor would ever have the balls to do it? Didn't think so.
 
Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County sued Barack Obama over his unconstitutional executive amnesty today.

How embarrassing for him. Obama did not grant amnesty to anyone.

All this hysterical hyperbole and wailing and gnashing of teeth over this imaginary amnesty is akin to some jackass insisting a Governor should "enforce the law" and execute someone on death row that the Governor has just granted a stay of execution, and who claims the Governor just pardoned the poor son of a bitch.

These people are seriously confused.

Obama granted a stay of execution (delayed deportation), not a pardon (amnesty). This is a measure designed to prevent the death row inmate (illegal immigrants) from being executed (deported) so that a retrial (anmnesty bill in Congress) can take place. You don't execute (deport) someone who might be about to be found innocent (granted amnesty by Congress).

Hope that finally clears up the confusion for some people, but I am not in any way confident it will. The rubes have had their minds poisoned by the laced piss they drank. Their intellect is in a seriously weakened state by six years of a steady piss stream of misinformation and propaganda.

You stupid double talking liar. You fucking sock puppet.
Brilliant retort! :laugh2:

You, could not possibly handle a brilliant retort, you hopeless fucking hack.

Your pathetic liars in the media on the left are lying to you again, and of course you believe them.

It is not a tax, it is a "penalty." No wonder Grubber called all of you too fucking stupid to handle the actual truth. So, the fucking liar in chief says it is not "amnesty" but "stay of execution of deportation." Ahhhhh, I got it. Since it is called something else, which is the essentially the same thing, he is able to sell it.

Like I said, you are a fucking moron. All of your posts. Every last one of them are nothing but you being the fucking pawn you are for your pathetic socialists in office.

No really. Brilliant on your part. Tell us how that obamacare thing you sold to us was. Now that we all know for a fact that the administration CALLED YOU PERSONALLY a moron for believing the version they sold to us.

Moron.
 
do you like being a sheep? Were you even born during Reagan? Do you ever think for yourself or are you just a parrot for the DNC?

I first met Reagan in 1977. I voted for him in 1980 and 1984, and served as active duty military under him during his entire Presidency and beyond. He is on my Top Ten Heroes of All Time list, in third place, behind my dad and Abraham Lincoln.

Reagan would be embarrassed at the condition of the conservative movement today, just as I am.

Nice words, but yet it is to cover the fact that you have become a far left drone.
Another brilliant retort! :laugh2:

I have no doubt you would be calling Reagan a far left drone if he were posting today.

Another far left drone post not based in reality..
 

Forum List

Back
Top