billyerock1991
Gold Member
- Apr 24, 2012
- 7,106
- 506
- 140
when I saw the head line I started laughing ... what a Idiot he is... whose next, john boehner???? or those idionts in texas???? republican love to show how ignorant they are especially when the constitution is involved... they love to flash their little constitution booklets they carry ... now if they could only comprehend what they are reading ... after all for god's shake they are repub-lie-clowns ..All of us citizens should get together and SUE HIM. and put him in his place. But you go Joe, someone is looking out for We the people in this country because Obama never has.
SNIP:
Posted by Jim Hoft on Friday, November 21, 2014, 8:46 AM
View attachment 34233
Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County sued Barack Obama over his unconstitutional executive amnesty today.
Sheriff Joe filed the suit in US District Court for the District of Columbia.
Freedom Watch reported:
(Washington, D.C., November 20, 2014) Today, in response to the executive order President Barack Obama has signed effectively granting amnesty to about a half of the illegal aliens currently in this country, Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Arizona filed a lawsuit to enjoin this unconstitutional act. This lawsuit can be found at www.freedomwatchusa.org.
Sheriff Arpaio’s lawyer is Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch, former federal prosecutor and founder of both Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch. Mr. Klayman recently succeeded in obtaining a preliminary injunction against the National Security Agency for having unconstitutionally accessed the telephonic metadata of nearly all American citizens. See Klayman v. Obama, et al (Civil Action No. 13-cv-851), filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
Upon filing the complaint, which is styled Arpaio v. Obama, et al. before the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (Civil Action No. 14-cv-1966), Sheriff Arpaio issued this statement:
ALL of it here:
Sheriff Joe Arpaio Sues Barack Obama Over Executive Amnesty The Gateway Pundit
in elected official can not be held personally responsible for the way he performs his official duties and so can not sued for damages done while performing his job.
However, I think the president would be liable in civil matters not related to his job. For example if he sold his house and the buyer believed that he was cheated in some way. Possibly the suit would have to wait until the president leaves office- I really do not know . I can not think of any instance in which the President was sued.
Last edited: