don't be silly.
victims often become victims because they provoke attacks.
the ALLEGED murder provoked no fires. he was in custody immediately after the incident and provoked nothing. he merely ALLEGEDLY provided an excuse for a bunch of fooked up bigoted israeli settlers to attempt to sate their blood lust.
I don't know what you are saying. Who was in custody? The victim or the stabber? I'm just saying that with your reasoning, the settlers could've been provoked into setting 50 fires, because they were so upset about the murder. It seems that the stabber had just been released from prison from an earlier crime of throwing stones, so he picked a Jew at random and killed him.
the person with the knife who stabbed the armed settler was shot and taken into custody. whether or not he is a murderer or not has yet to be determined.
my reasoning is that if someone is threatening you with a firearm, you have a right to defend yourself. what you are saying is that if a person becomes upset, their anger somehow justifies their behaviour.
it seems that stupid people indulge in a bigoted, blood lust, rush to judgement and wise people and just people wait until the facts are in.