Asclepias
Diamond Member
What "case" and who told you it was damaged? She had every right to do what she did short of knocking the woman on her ass for confronting her. Could she have handled it differently? Of course but no one knows what the best way to handle it was for her. Maybe she was tired of whites attempting to force their beliefs on her?Yup, it is the mother's decision what her child should experience. And while a refusal to back down might be laudable in many instances, to sink to the level of expression that this woman did just damages her "case". Being abusive and profane are the last things you would want to become when confronted with someone you cannot agree with. A cold smile and an "excuse me, I have to go." would have been much more effective, perhaps even making the dog people appear foolish. As it was, she came across as a gross termagant with a filthy mouth. Her performance leaves bystanders asking whose behaviour is more harmful to a child. I failed to notice any white gang attack in the video presented.I dont know. Old enough to walk to the car on her own I would guess. It doesnt matter what the child is capable of understanding. Who says its the dog owners right to explain anything to the child concerning the law? Who but the mother has the authority to make those decisions? I was thoroughly impressed by her refusal to not back down while the woman deflecting by talking about her husband being in the military and then later her instance on trying to tell her about a law that had nada to do with the issue. If i was there I am sure things would have been handled differently instead of the gang attack the white people made on her.That begs the question, how old is the child in question? One old enough to go to the car, or something, alone would indicate a child capable of understanding an explanation of the law. A younger child should probably have been escorted by an adult or older child. All that considered, I still see no reason why this woman became the screaming, abusive harpy she did. Really, no one is impressed by that kind of anger and abusive, raw language. The woman hurt her case far more with her response than if she had simply excused herself and left with the child, thereby snubbing the dog people.I didnt see the child in the video so my assumption is that she is outside the establishment. The level of anger tells me she suppressed it long enough to tell the child to go to the car or something.While I agree, to an extent, that confrontation in the presence of a child might be best avoided, how do you feel about the language and manner the mother demonstrated...in front of her child?A couple of reasons. First of all the law wasnt the issue. You cant force someone to think your dog is clean. Second of all you dont confront someone in front of their child.