Serious proposal for the gun control crowd

P@triot

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2011
Messages
53,567
Reaction score
6,434
Points
1,860
Location
United States
The gun debate rages on and on with no one really changing their minds. Well, that’s sort of the definition of insanity (doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results each time).

With that in mind, I asked myself how we could approach this issue in a way that hasn’t been done before. There is always a solution to every problem. It’s just a matter of finding it.

So I have a completely serious proposal for the proponents of gun control. If the 2A supporters agreed to use tax payer money to have every single firearm manufactured attend an extensive and comprehensive mental health evaluation (including training firearms on the value of human life), would you then agree to allow all citizens to own any type of firearm they desire - without restriction?

(*Note that I will have 0 tolerance for trolling in this thread and will report every instance. Either answer honestly/seriously or move along to another thread)
 

elongobardi

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2018
Messages
3,884
Reaction score
753
Points
255
I’m pro gun and pro 2a. The only problem I see is one they won’t pay for it and too who picks the psychologist or psychiatrist. If the left hand picks them then it’s a bias opinion because there not going to pay him to pass people. It comes down to getting rid of HIPPA when it comes to gun purchases. They run a local psychological check but they don’t do a National like they do with a criminal background check. If you do a national psych check you can catch more people with psych issues.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Bo Didleysquat

VIP Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2019
Messages
6,191
Reaction score
544
Points
65
The gun debate rages on and on with no one really changing their minds. Well, that’s sort of the definition of insanity (doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results each time).

With that in mind, I asked myself how we could approach this issue in a way that hasn’t been done before. There is always a solution to every problem. It’s just a matter of finding it.

So I have a completely serious proposal for the proponents of gun control. If the 2A supporters agreed to use tax payer money to have every single firearm manufactured attend an extensive and comprehensive mental health evaluation (including training firearms on the value of human life), would you then agree to allow all citizens to own any type of firearm they desire - without restriction?

(*Note that I will have 0 tolerance for trolling in this thread and will report every instance. Either answer honestly/seriously or move along to another thread)
The gun "debate" does not rage onward, we have the solution; everyone carries, that way the "good guys" carry the day like they carry their guns. Teachers maintain safety and control in schools via the gun. And really now, we can't even get our police to attend an extensive and comprehensive mental health evaluation (including training firearms on the value of human life) that works, rather obviously.
 

TNHarley

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2012
Messages
66,314
Reaction score
10,845
Points
2,030
Lol love it.
#GunsMentalHealthMatters
 

Brain357

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2013
Messages
32,601
Reaction score
2,021
Points
1,115
The gun debate rages on and on with no one really changing their minds. Well, that’s sort of the definition of insanity (doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results each time).

With that in mind, I asked myself how we could approach this issue in a way that hasn’t been done before. There is always a solution to every problem. It’s just a matter of finding it.

So I have a completely serious proposal for the proponents of gun control. If the 2A supporters agreed to use tax payer money to have every single firearm manufactured attend an extensive and comprehensive mental health evaluation (including training firearms on the value of human life), would you then agree to allow all citizens to own any type of firearm they desire - without restriction?

(*Note that I will have 0 tolerance for trolling in this thread and will report every instance. Either answer honestly/seriously or move along to another thread)
Do you have any evidence that would help our problems?
 

RetiredGySgt

Diamond Member
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
46,547
Reaction score
8,354
Points
2,040
Location
North Carolina
The gun debate rages on and on with no one really changing their minds. Well, that’s sort of the definition of insanity (doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results each time).

With that in mind, I asked myself how we could approach this issue in a way that hasn’t been done before. There is always a solution to every problem. It’s just a matter of finding it.

So I have a completely serious proposal for the proponents of gun control. If the 2A supporters agreed to use tax payer money to have every single firearm manufactured attend an extensive and comprehensive mental health evaluation (including training firearms on the value of human life), would you then agree to allow all citizens to own any type of firearm they desire - without restriction?

(*Note that I will have 0 tolerance for trolling in this thread and will report every instance. Either answer honestly/seriously or move along to another thread)
Do you have any evidence that would help our problems?
I tell ya what I disagree with his proposal because it can not be done fairly, but you provide no rational at all for your stance be specific list a proposal loser.
 

Brain357

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2013
Messages
32,601
Reaction score
2,021
Points
1,115
The gun debate rages on and on with no one really changing their minds. Well, that’s sort of the definition of insanity (doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results each time).

With that in mind, I asked myself how we could approach this issue in a way that hasn’t been done before. There is always a solution to every problem. It’s just a matter of finding it.

So I have a completely serious proposal for the proponents of gun control. If the 2A supporters agreed to use tax payer money to have every single firearm manufactured attend an extensive and comprehensive mental health evaluation (including training firearms on the value of human life), would you then agree to allow all citizens to own any type of firearm they desire - without restriction?

(*Note that I will have 0 tolerance for trolling in this thread and will report every instance. Either answer honestly/seriously or move along to another thread)
Do you have any evidence that would help our problems?
I tell ya what I disagree with his proposal because it can not be done fairly, but you provide no rational at all for your stance be specific list a proposal loser.
You don’t think we need any evidence what he’s offering would help? Strange...
 

ThunderKiss1965

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2015
Messages
8,524
Reaction score
1,586
Points
290
Location
GNO
The gun debate rages on and on with no one really changing their minds. Well, that’s sort of the definition of insanity (doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results each time).

With that in mind, I asked myself how we could approach this issue in a way that hasn’t been done before. There is always a solution to every problem. It’s just a matter of finding it.

So I have a completely serious proposal for the proponents of gun control. If the 2A supporters agreed to use tax payer money to have every single firearm manufactured attend an extensive and comprehensive mental health evaluation (including training firearms on the value of human life), would you then agree to allow all citizens to own any type of firearm they desire - without restriction?

(*Note that I will have 0 tolerance for trolling in this thread and will report every instance. Either answer honestly/seriously or move along to another thread)
Nope. Shall not be infringed is the final answer.
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
73,637
Reaction score
5,747
Points
1,855
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
The gun debate rages on and on with no one really changing their minds. Well, that’s sort of the definition of insanity (doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results each time).

With that in mind, I asked myself how we could approach this issue in a way that hasn’t been done before. There is always a solution to every problem. It’s just a matter of finding it.

So I have a completely serious proposal for the proponents of gun control. If the 2A supporters agreed to use tax payer money to have every single firearm manufactured attend an extensive and comprehensive mental health evaluation (including training firearms on the value of human life), would you then agree to allow all citizens to own any type of firearm they desire - without restriction?

(*Note that I will have 0 tolerance for trolling in this thread and will report every instance. Either answer honestly/seriously or move along to another thread)
Nope My rights are not up for any proposal
NO COMPROMISE
 

Old Man Grumbles

VIP Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2019
Messages
821
Reaction score
176
Points
70
Location
Colorado, USA
One issue that would arise is holding the psychiatrist responsible for anyone they certify who goes off the deep end at some later time and commits some crime using a firearm. That would be enough for psychiatrists to refuse to be certify someone to be allowed to purchase.possess firearms.

So, I don't find your proposal as a reasonable course of action. There is no way that I see that the future behavior of an individual can be predicted with any measure of accuracy.
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
73,637
Reaction score
5,747
Points
1,855
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
One issue that would arise is holding the psychiatrist responsible for anyone they certify who goes off the deep end at some later time and commits some crime using a firearm. That would be enough for psychiatrists to refuse to be certify someone to be allowed to purchase.possess firearms.

So, I don't find your proposal as a reasonable course of action. There is no way that I see that the future behavior of an individual can be predicted with any measure of accuracy.
If a person is deemed too dangerous to have a firearm they are too dangerous to be allowed in public unsupervised.
There are other dangerous items they can use to carry out any harm.
 

Billyboom

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2016
Messages
4,505
Reaction score
929
Points
170
A mental heath evaluation every 2 years for all gun owners.

No exemptions.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
73,637
Reaction score
5,747
Points
1,855
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
A mental heath evaluation every 2 years for all gun owners.

No exemptions.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
a voters test for all leftist every year before they vote and a mental evaluation for all blue states before they can drive a vehicle.
I almost forgot VOTER ID.
 

Cellblock2429

Gold Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2016
Messages
21,876
Reaction score
3,792
Points
290
Location
New York
The gun debate rages on and on with no one really changing their minds. Well, that’s sort of the definition of insanity (doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results each time).

With that in mind, I asked myself how we could approach this issue in a way that hasn’t been done before. There is always a solution to every problem. It’s just a matter of finding it.

So I have a completely serious proposal for the proponents of gun control. If the 2A supporters agreed to use tax payer money to have every single firearm manufactured attend an extensive and comprehensive mental health evaluation (including training firearms on the value of human life), would you then agree to allow all citizens to own any type of firearm they desire - without restriction?

(*Note that I will have 0 tolerance for trolling in this thread and will report every instance. Either answer honestly/seriously or move along to another thread)
/——/ No, because Libs will eventually gain control of the tests and start denying gun ownership. The Red Flag law is a perfect example. Bad idea.
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
73,637
Reaction score
5,747
Points
1,855
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
The gun debate rages on and on with no one really changing their minds. Well, that’s sort of the definition of insanity (doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results each time).

With that in mind, I asked myself how we could approach this issue in a way that hasn’t been done before. There is always a solution to every problem. It’s just a matter of finding it.

So I have a completely serious proposal for the proponents of gun control. If the 2A supporters agreed to use tax payer money to have every single firearm manufactured attend an extensive and comprehensive mental health evaluation (including training firearms on the value of human life), would you then agree to allow all citizens to own any type of firearm they desire - without restriction?

(*Note that I will have 0 tolerance for trolling in this thread and will report every instance. Either answer honestly/seriously or move along to another thread)
/——/ No, because Libs will eventually gain control of the tests and start denying gun ownership. The Red Flag law is a perfect example. Bad idea.
iF A PERSON IS TO DANGEROUS FOR A GUN THEY ARE TOO DANGEROUS TO BE ALLOWED IN PUBLIC.
 

Billyboom

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2016
Messages
4,505
Reaction score
929
Points
170
A mental heath evaluation every 2 years for all gun owners.

No exemptions.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
a voters test for all leftist every year before they vote and a mental evaluation for all blue states before they can drive a vehicle.
I almost forgot VOTER ID.
That’ll curb gun violence for sure [emoji57]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Cellblock2429

Gold Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2016
Messages
21,876
Reaction score
3,792
Points
290
Location
New York
The gun debate rages on and on with no one really changing their minds. Well, that’s sort of the definition of insanity (doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results each time).

With that in mind, I asked myself how we could approach this issue in a way that hasn’t been done before. There is always a solution to every problem. It’s just a matter of finding it.

So I have a completely serious proposal for the proponents of gun control. If the 2A supporters agreed to use tax payer money to have every single firearm manufactured attend an extensive and comprehensive mental health evaluation (including training firearms on the value of human life), would you then agree to allow all citizens to own any type of firearm they desire - without restriction?

(*Note that I will have 0 tolerance for trolling in this thread and will report every instance. Either answer honestly/seriously or move along to another thread)
/——/ No, because Libs will eventually gain control of the tests and start denying gun ownership. The Red Flag law is a perfect example. Bad idea.
iF A PERSON IS TO DANGEROUS FOR A GUN THEY ARE TOO DANGEROUS TO BE ALLOWED IN PUBLIC.
/——/ If you can’t see the potential abuse then you are incredibly naive.
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
73,637
Reaction score
5,747
Points
1,855
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
A mental heath evaluation every 2 years for all gun owners.

No exemptions.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
a voters test for all leftist every year before they vote and a mental evaluation for all blue states before they can drive a vehicle.
I almost forgot VOTER ID.
That’ll curb gun violence for sure [emoji57]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
More people are killed with other things than with a gun.I'm not concerned with gun violence
 
Joined
Aug 15, 2017
Messages
21,550
Reaction score
4,318
Points
290
Location
Tejas
The gun debate rages on and on with no one really changing their minds. Well, that’s sort of the definition of insanity (doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results each time).

With that in mind, I asked myself how we could approach this issue in a way that hasn’t been done before. There is always a solution to every problem. It’s just a matter of finding it.

So I have a completely serious proposal for the proponents of gun control. If the 2A supporters agreed to use tax payer money to have every single firearm manufactured attend an extensive and comprehensive mental health evaluation (including training firearms on the value of human life), would you then agree to allow all citizens to own any type of firearm they desire - without restriction?

(*Note that I will have 0 tolerance for trolling in this thread and will report every instance. Either answer honestly/seriously or move along to another thread)
I would agree to a such a program. We must get these firearms evaluated and get the dangerous firearms the help they need.

My question is, what about the bullets? Don't they need similar evaluations?

.
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
73,637
Reaction score
5,747
Points
1,855
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
The gun debate rages on and on with no one really changing their minds. Well, that’s sort of the definition of insanity (doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results each time).

With that in mind, I asked myself how we could approach this issue in a way that hasn’t been done before. There is always a solution to every problem. It’s just a matter of finding it.

So I have a completely serious proposal for the proponents of gun control. If the 2A supporters agreed to use tax payer money to have every single firearm manufactured attend an extensive and comprehensive mental health evaluation (including training firearms on the value of human life), would you then agree to allow all citizens to own any type of firearm they desire - without restriction?

(*Note that I will have 0 tolerance for trolling in this thread and will report every instance. Either answer honestly/seriously or move along to another thread)
/——/ No, because Libs will eventually gain control of the tests and start denying gun ownership. The Red Flag law is a perfect example. Bad idea.
iF A PERSON IS TO DANGEROUS FOR A GUN THEY ARE TOO DANGEROUS TO BE ALLOWED IN PUBLIC.
/——/ If you can’t see the potential abuse then you are incredibly naive.
I see the abuse I was just saying if a person is too dangerous for a gun they are too dangerous to live in public unsupervised.
 
Top