Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Actually, I care very much about reduced homicides. It's very telling that you don't. But don't even think about attributing that bullshit to me.Either way, I don't give a rat fuck about reduced deaths, and neither do you. If public safety were truly the concern, other things would have been banned long before any gun ban.
.
"Highest level in a decade."/——-/ You tell ‘em Buster. BTW Homicides in England reach highest level in a decadeIn the developed world, prohibition has resulted in homicide rates far, far below our own.Why don't we do that for everyone now, regardless of whether they will buy a firearm, and the people too dangerous or incompetent to possess a firearm are jailed, committed, or executed.I've said often that we need to register gun buyers, not guns.The gun debate rages on and on with no one really changing their minds. Well, that’s sort of the definition of insanity (doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results each time).
With that in mind, I asked myself how we could approach this issue in a way that hasn’t been done before. There is always a solution to every problem. It’s just a matter of finding it.
So I have a completely serious proposal for the proponents of gun control. If the 2A supporters agreed to use tax payer money to have every single firearm manufactured attend an extensive and comprehensive mental health evaluation (including training firearms on the value of human life), would you then agree to allow all citizens to own any type of firearm they desire - without restriction?
(*Note that I will have 0 tolerance for trolling in this thread and will report every instance. Either answer honestly/seriously or move along to another thread)
Let me see if I can dig up my past posts.
Let's just do a purge. Assume that those walking free will have access to firearms. It a given that it will happen. Prohibition does not lead to abstinence. It leads to black markets.
.
But nice attempt to build a straw man around my idea!
a voters test for all leftist every year before they vote and a mental evaluation for all blue states before they can drive a vehicle.A mental heath evaluation every 2 years for all gun owners.
No exemptions.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I almost forgot VOTER ID.
That’ll curb gun violence for sure [emoji57]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I agree.Let me make this more clear:
All
Black
Folks
Should
Own
A
Gun
WRONGActually, I care very much about reduced homicides. It's very telling that you don't. But don't even think about attributing that bullshit to me.Either way, I don't give a rat fuck about reduced deaths, and neither do you. If public safety were truly the concern, other things would have been banned long before any gun ban.
.
As for "other things", there is nothing else which is as responsible for as many homicides in America than guns. Not even close.
We are losing around 12,000 people a year to homicides by guns. If Muslims were killing 12,000 people a year, you'd be calling for us to nuke the Middle East.
/——/ Population difference, roaming gangs, drugs, feral democrats running amuck makes the difference."Highest level in a decade."/——-/ You tell ‘em Buster. BTW Homicides in England reach highest level in a decadeIn the developed world, prohibition has resulted in homicide rates far, far below our own.Why don't we do that for everyone now, regardless of whether they will buy a firearm, and the people too dangerous or incompetent to possess a firearm are jailed, committed, or executed.I've said often that we need to register gun buyers, not guns.The gun debate rages on and on with no one really changing their minds. Well, that’s sort of the definition of insanity (doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results each time).
With that in mind, I asked myself how we could approach this issue in a way that hasn’t been done before. There is always a solution to every problem. It’s just a matter of finding it.
So I have a completely serious proposal for the proponents of gun control. If the 2A supporters agreed to use tax payer money to have every single firearm manufactured attend an extensive and comprehensive mental health evaluation (including training firearms on the value of human life), would you then agree to allow all citizens to own any type of firearm they desire - without restriction?
(*Note that I will have 0 tolerance for trolling in this thread and will report every instance. Either answer honestly/seriously or move along to another thread)
Let me see if I can dig up my past posts.
Let's just do a purge. Assume that those walking free will have access to firearms. It a given that it will happen. Prohibition does not lead to abstinence. It leads to black markets.
.
But nice attempt to build a straw man around my idea!
Still far, far, far below our homicide rate, skippy.
Oh I have guns hon, permitted to carry, that's just not where I get my sense of identity or security or purpose for living from. They're nothing but tools, like a hammer or a screw driver. They are not the basis of my manhood or patsiotism.I've yet to see an anti-gunner compromise.We have plenty of compromise and many die for it all the time.Nope My rights are not up for any proposalThe gun debate rages on and on with no one really changing their minds. Well, that’s sort of the definition of insanity (doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results each time).
With that in mind, I asked myself how we could approach this issue in a way that hasn’t been done before. There is always a solution to every problem. It’s just a matter of finding it.
So I have a completely serious proposal for the proponents of gun control. If the 2A supporters agreed to use tax payer money to have every single firearm manufactured attend an extensive and comprehensive mental health evaluation (including training firearms on the value of human life), would you then agree to allow all citizens to own any type of firearm they desire - without restriction?
(*Note that I will have 0 tolerance for trolling in this thread and will report every instance. Either answer honestly/seriously or move along to another thread)
NO COMPROMISE
So take your compromise and shove it up your ass.
So, it's not the fact that people die. It's HOW people die that bothers you.Actually, I care very much about reduced homicides. It's very telling that you don't. But don't even think about attributing that bullshit to me.Either way, I don't give a rat fuck about reduced deaths, and neither do you. If public safety were truly the concern, other things would have been banned long before any gun ban.
.
As for "other things", there is nothing else which is as responsible for as many homicides in America than guns. Not even close.
We are losing around 12,000 people a year to homicides by guns. If Muslims were killing 12,000 people a year, you'd be calling for us to nuke the Middle East.
And disarming law abiding citizens has NO effect on gang violence since they do NOT buy firearms legally and do not follow any law about firearms.WRONGActually, I care very much about reduced homicides. It's very telling that you don't. But don't even think about attributing that bullshit to me.Either way, I don't give a rat fuck about reduced deaths, and neither do you. If public safety were truly the concern, other things would have been banned long before any gun ban.
.
As for "other things", there is nothing else which is as responsible for as many homicides in America than guns. Not even close.
We are losing around 12,000 people a year to homicides by guns. If Muslims were killing 12,000 people a year, you'd be calling for us to nuke the Middle East.
Your numbers are way too high
Homicides are around 1300
The rest are police shootings and gang-related.
In the developed world, prohibition has resulted in homicide rates far, far below our own.Why don't we do that for everyone now, regardless of whether they will buy a firearm, and the people too dangerous or incompetent to possess a firearm are jailed, committed, or executed.I've said often that we need to register gun buyers, not guns.The gun debate rages on and on with no one really changing their minds. Well, that’s sort of the definition of insanity (doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results each time).
With that in mind, I asked myself how we could approach this issue in a way that hasn’t been done before. There is always a solution to every problem. It’s just a matter of finding it.
So I have a completely serious proposal for the proponents of gun control. If the 2A supporters agreed to use tax payer money to have every single firearm manufactured attend an extensive and comprehensive mental health evaluation (including training firearms on the value of human life), would you then agree to allow all citizens to own any type of firearm they desire - without restriction?
(*Note that I will have 0 tolerance for trolling in this thread and will report every instance. Either answer honestly/seriously or move along to another thread)
Let me see if I can dig up my past posts.
Let's just do a purge. Assume that those walking free will have access to firearms. It a given that it will happen. Prohibition does not lead to abstinence. It leads to black markets.
.
But nice attempt to build a straw man around my idea!
Paranoid white male fragility./——/ Population difference, roaming gangs, drugs, feral democrats running amuck makes the difference."Highest level in a decade."/——-/ You tell ‘em Buster. BTW Homicides in England reach highest level in a decadeIn the developed world, prohibition has resulted in homicide rates far, far below our own.Why don't we do that for everyone now, regardless of whether they will buy a firearm, and the people too dangerous or incompetent to possess a firearm are jailed, committed, or executed.I've said often that we need to register gun buyers, not guns.
Let me see if I can dig up my past posts.
Let's just do a purge. Assume that those walking free will have access to firearms. It a given that it will happen. Prohibition does not lead to abstinence. It leads to black markets.
.
But nice attempt to build a straw man around my idea!
Still far, far, far below our homicide rate, skippy.
/——-/ Actually we want law abiding Blacks to have guns especially those living in Blue State slums. It’s the criminals we want disarmed.[cue doom music]
HANNITY: Tonight on the Sean Hannity show, negroes with guns! Why aren't our politicians doing something to get the sale of guns under control?
Same here. I taught my kids how to use firearms when our youngest was six. And she turned out to be a crack shot!Oh I have guns hon, permitted to carry, that's just not where I get my sense of identity or security ot purpose for living from.I've yet to see an anti-gunner compromise.We have plenty of compromise and many die for it all the time.Nope My rights are not up for any proposalThe gun debate rages on and on with no one really changing their minds. Well, that’s sort of the definition of insanity (doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results each time).
With that in mind, I asked myself how we could approach this issue in a way that hasn’t been done before. There is always a solution to every problem. It’s just a matter of finding it.
So I have a completely serious proposal for the proponents of gun control. If the 2A supporters agreed to use tax payer money to have every single firearm manufactured attend an extensive and comprehensive mental health evaluation (including training firearms on the value of human life), would you then agree to allow all citizens to own any type of firearm they desire - without restriction?
(*Note that I will have 0 tolerance for trolling in this thread and will report every instance. Either answer honestly/seriously or move along to another thread)
NO COMPROMISE
So take your compromise and shove it up your ass.
We see you bad guys shoot people all the time and what's your defense? "I was scared so I get to murder".In the developed world, prohibition has resulted in homicide rates far, far below our own.Why don't we do that for everyone now, regardless of whether they will buy a firearm, and the people too dangerous or incompetent to possess a firearm are jailed, committed, or executed.I've said often that we need to register gun buyers, not guns.The gun debate rages on and on with no one really changing their minds. Well, that’s sort of the definition of insanity (doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results each time).
With that in mind, I asked myself how we could approach this issue in a way that hasn’t been done before. There is always a solution to every problem. It’s just a matter of finding it.
So I have a completely serious proposal for the proponents of gun control. If the 2A supporters agreed to use tax payer money to have every single firearm manufactured attend an extensive and comprehensive mental health evaluation (including training firearms on the value of human life), would you then agree to allow all citizens to own any type of firearm they desire - without restriction?
(*Note that I will have 0 tolerance for trolling in this thread and will report every instance. Either answer honestly/seriously or move along to another thread)
Let me see if I can dig up my past posts.
Let's just do a purge. Assume that those walking free will have access to firearms. It a given that it will happen. Prohibition does not lead to abstinence. It leads to black markets.
.
But nice attempt to build a straw man around my idea!
Take your gun control and shove it up your ass. Bad guys will always get guns no matter what. Look at Chicago, Baltimore, Camden. All run by Democrats with strict gun laws and still have 20 plus shootings a weekend. Gun control is working well there dumbass.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So when have antigunners compromised Hon?Oh I have guns hon, permitted to carry, that's just not where I get my sense of identity or security or purpose for living from. They're nothing but tools, like a hammer or a screw driver. They are not the basis of my manhood or patsiotism.I've yet to see an anti-gunner compromise.We have plenty of compromise and many die for it all the time.Nope My rights are not up for any proposalThe gun debate rages on and on with no one really changing their minds. Well, that’s sort of the definition of insanity (doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results each time).
With that in mind, I asked myself how we could approach this issue in a way that hasn’t been done before. There is always a solution to every problem. It’s just a matter of finding it.
So I have a completely serious proposal for the proponents of gun control. If the 2A supporters agreed to use tax payer money to have every single firearm manufactured attend an extensive and comprehensive mental health evaluation (including training firearms on the value of human life), would you then agree to allow all citizens to own any type of firearm they desire - without restriction?
(*Note that I will have 0 tolerance for trolling in this thread and will report every instance. Either answer honestly/seriously or move along to another thread)
NO COMPROMISE
So take your compromise and shove it up your ass.
Many of us do that without getting all hysterical about it.Same here. I taught my kids how to use firearms when our youngest was six. And she turned out to be a crack shot!Oh I have guns hon, permitted to carry, that's just not where I get my sense of identity or security ot purpose for living from.I've yet to see an anti-gunner compromise.We have plenty of compromise and many die for it all the time.Nope My rights are not up for any proposalThe gun debate rages on and on with no one really changing their minds. Well, that’s sort of the definition of insanity (doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results each time).
With that in mind, I asked myself how we could approach this issue in a way that hasn’t been done before. There is always a solution to every problem. It’s just a matter of finding it.
So I have a completely serious proposal for the proponents of gun control. If the 2A supporters agreed to use tax payer money to have every single firearm manufactured attend an extensive and comprehensive mental health evaluation (including training firearms on the value of human life), would you then agree to allow all citizens to own any type of firearm they desire - without restriction?
(*Note that I will have 0 tolerance for trolling in this thread and will report every instance. Either answer honestly/seriously or move along to another thread)
NO COMPROMISE
So take your compromise and shove it up your ass.
They have fired every caliber of weapon which is legal to own.
ExactlyAnd disarming law abiding citizens has NO effect on gang violence since they do NOT buy firearms legally and do not follow any law about firearms.WRONGActually, I care very much about reduced homicides. It's very telling that you don't. But don't even think about attributing that bullshit to me.Either way, I don't give a rat fuck about reduced deaths, and neither do you. If public safety were truly the concern, other things would have been banned long before any gun ban.
.
As for "other things", there is nothing else which is as responsible for as many homicides in America than guns. Not even close.
We are losing around 12,000 people a year to homicides by guns. If Muslims were killing 12,000 people a year, you'd be calling for us to nuke the Middle East.
Your numbers are way too high
Homicides are around 1300
The rest are police shootings and gang-related.
