Senator Chris Coons asks Republican Senators as to whether Trump can run for a 3rd term. Here are the surprising answers!

Is Trump worth ignoring the Constitution and us becoming an Authoritarian regime?

  • Yes

    Votes: 5 41.7%
  • No

    Votes: 7 58.3%

  • Total voters
    12
The amendment has been in place for 75 years. That means it is NOT new and has been adhered to for all of these years. Anything about the Constitution can be changed (no matter the age it has been around). You either believe in the Constitution (no matter the age they have been there) or not. You have to follow it no matter what, and if you don't you are a traitor (until it is changed).

are you aware of any process going on right now to change that?

If not, you are considered a traitor at THIS TIME!

Oh, and by the way, it takes 38 states to change the Constitution, meaning your 28 red states mean nothing!
Liar!! Yes it does take 38 states BUT you assume that no Democrats will vote it in. I DON'T ASSUME THAT.

Considered a TRAITOR?? By whom? lmao. So those who want a Change in the Constitution are all TRAITORS...like those who ever wanted an amendment.

You're just dumb!!! BTW; how can a furriner be a traitor? I'm saying that the US could get rid of the amendment; it CAN!! You belie that idea!!!

bbl; Dawn is breaking and I'm going fishing.

Greg
 
Liar!! Yes it does take 38 states BUT you assume that no Democrats will vote it in. I DON'T ASSUME THAT.

Considered a TRAITOR?? By whom? lmao. So those who want a Change in the Constitution are all TRAITORS...like those who ever wanted an amendment.

You're just dumb!!! BTW; how can a furriner be a traitor? I'm saying that the US could get rid of the amendment; it CAN!! You belie that idea!!!

bbl; Dawn is breaking and I'm going fishing.

Greg
I am dumb? what about what I said is dumb?

1) is there an amendment that says that no president can serve for more than two terms? Yes there is
2) I did check on what the people that ignore or go against the Constitution and they are not called "traitors". They are called "."subversives". As such, I change my statement about calling you a traitor and call you a subversive
3) I agreed with you that the amendments can be changed, but until they are change, they are still to be followed.

What about what I said is dumb? I think that what you said in accusing me of being dumb is the actual dumb thing.

By the way. do you personally support Trump for a 3rd term?

Oh, and as far as calling me a liar. Can you be specific as to what I lied about?

I said it takes 38 States to change an amendment to the Constitution. Is that lie?

Did I say that Blue States cannot vote for changing the amendment? No, I didn't.

so, what was the lie(s)?

I am starting to believe that your mind is not working well. You are saying things that do not apply as responses to what I said exactly. I call that "your mind not working well as it is inventing things that were not stated by me".
 
Last edited:
The 12th amendment says the the vice president shall "open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted." They can't be counted if the vice president discards electors and sends it back to the state.

I don't disagree, but the point isn't contextual to my comment.
 
Only Trump declared fraud.
None of the states that did recounts and audits
No courts that found his suits to be frivolous
Not Congress

Crybaby Loser

Again, not in context. to the comment.
 
The amendment has been in place for 75 years. That means it is NOT new and has been adhered to for all of these years. Anything about the Constitution can be changed (no matter the age it has been around). You either believe in the Constitution (no matter the age they have been there) or not. You have to follow it no matter what, and if you don't you are a traitor (until it is changed).

are you aware of any process going on right now to change that?

If not, you are considered a traitor at THIS TIME!

Oh, and by the way, it takes 38 states to change the Constitution, meaning your 28 red states mean nothing!
<~~~~~~~~~~>
There are currently, several amendments to the U.S. Constitution being discussed in Congress. These proposals focus on significant issues affecting governance and public policy. However, many of these amendments do not progress beyond initial discussions and rarely receive enough support for approval, because Democrats are vehemently opposed to them.
They are as follows:

Balanced BudgetsProposals aimed at requiring the federal government to maintain a balanced budget.
Term LimitsAmendments suggesting limits on the number of terms elected officials can serve.
Campaign FinancingProposals addressing the regulation of campaign contributions and spending.
 
<~~~~~~~~~~>
There are currently, several amendments to the U.S. Constitution being discussed in Congress. These proposals focus on significant issues affecting governance and public policy. However, many of these amendments do not progress beyond initial discussions and rarely receive enough support for approval, because Democrats are vehemently opposed to them.
They are as follows:


Balanced BudgetsProposals aimed at requiring the federal government to maintain a balanced budget.
Term LimitsAmendments suggesting limits on the number of terms elected officials can serve.
Campaign FinancingProposals addressing the regulation of campaign contributions and spending.
Are those ideas/proposals new, or something discussed in most administrations and on both sides?
 
It has not yet officially happened, but the answers given to Coons means that they are open to the idea and being OPEN to the idea, means they are open to going against the Constitution. This also means that they are not true believers in what the Constitutional amendment means and are not willing to support it.

You're referring to John Marck (Judicial nominee). One guy who struck me as bad as those (many) who couldn't answer "what is a woman?". Nothing to see here.
 
Do you check under your bed for Trump at bed time?

Vance will finish the job Trump started. Then maybe one of Trump’s sons will run.
Trump would not dare come to my home. I was a cop, I own a gun and know how to use it, and Trump coming to my home would be treated as an intruder with bad intentions and would be shot on the spot.

As far as JD Vance:

 
I am dumb? what about what I said is dumb?

1) is there an amendment that says that no president can serve for more than two terms? Yes there is
2) I did check on what the people that ignore or go against the Constitution and they are not called "traitors". They are called "."subversives". As such, I change my statement about calling you a traitor and call you a subversive
3) I agreed with you that the amendments can be changed, but until they are change, they are still to be followed.

What about what I said is dumb? I think that what you said in accusing me of being dumb is the actual dumb thing.

By the way. do you personally support Trump for a 3rd term?

Oh, and as far as calling me a liar. Can you be specific as to what I lied about?

I said it takes 38 States to change an amendment to the Constitution. Is that lie?

Did I say that Blue States cannot vote for changing the amendment? No, I didn't.

so, what was the lie(s)?

I am starting to believe that your mind is not working well. You are saying things that do not apply as responses to what I said exactly. I call that "your mind not working well as it is inventing things that were not stated by me".
Are you okay?
 
Trump would not dare come to my home. I was a cop, I own a gun and know how to use it, and Trump coming to my home would be treated as an intruder with bad intentions and would be shot on the spot.
 
Back
Top Bottom